Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • I am getting increasingly comfortable with generating ‘a statistic’ in the 30-50

    I am getting increasingly comfortable with generating ‘a statistic’ in the 30-50M range. And that’s probably what’s necessary.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-02 12:52:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091680752620765185

  • I am getting increasingly comfortable with generating ‘a statistic’ in the 30-50

    I am getting increasingly comfortable with generating ‘a statistic’ in the 30-50M range. And that’s probably what’s necessary.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-02 07:52:00 UTC

  • CLARIFICATION: Propertarianism can be used to create ANY political order – just

    CLARIFICATION: Propertarianism can be used to create ANY political order – just transparently and truthfully. However it explains why ethnonationalism is the OPTIMUM artistic, educational, social, political, economic, and military order.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 21:10:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091443574787526656

    Reply addressees: @werkraum14 @CatlinNyaa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091437303191490566


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091437303191490566

  • This is false Nathan. GOvernments exist to prevent the imposition of alternative

    This is false Nathan. GOvernments exist to prevent the imposition of alternative governments even LESS desirable to the people. States exist to produce commons, and the commons required is defense. Bad governance exists because CITIZENS tolerate it. Govts are a necessary defense.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 17:33:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091388976341155840

    Reply addressees: @VeldstraNathan @xmjEE @Jake38109894

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091378761235353605


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091378761235353605

  • I AM A LIBERTARIAN because I and my people are capable of it. I would not recomm

    I AM A LIBERTARIAN because I and my people are capable of it. I would not recommend it to people who are INCAPABLE of it.There is one perfect rule of law,but the governments we create under it must reflect the ABILITIES of the people. (Obviously EITHER Germans OR Anglos are odd.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 17:31:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091388531455463424

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50943321_10156956373377264_206469371

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50943321_10156956373377264_206469371

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50943321_10156956373377264_2064693712373415936_o_10156956373372264.jpg THERE IS ONLY ONE SOURCE OF LIBERTY: PERMISSION OF THOSE WHO HAVE SOVEREIGNTY.Zach BushAre you familiar with Robert Wenzel’s book on Private Property Theory / PropertarianismFeb 1, 2019, 5:37 PMMicah PezdirtzLiberty means “I rely on an insurer to retaliate on my behalf upon violation of these given terms”

    Sovereignty means “I retaliate”.Feb 1, 2019, 5:57 PMWilliam L. BengeKevin Gutzman, professor emeritus at Western Connecticut State University and a shy celebrity among libertarians, blocked me couple years ago for my assertions on sovereignty, he defending that sovereignty only is an attribute of the state, but not of the individual, not of the owner of personal agency.

    He therefore will defend the states as sovereign, but not the individuals living in those states? The converstation could never progress.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei_i-vuxhh8&ab_channel=CANNVFeb 2, 2019, 12:20 PMWilliam L. BengeThe lieutenants of libertarianism will have to at some point be singled out, challenged and defeated, since they are entirely entrenched in the tiny cordoned-off libertarian economy (and thus possess probably no incentive whatsoever to pick this fight), and wish to sustain the comfy status quo.Feb 2, 2019, 12:24 PMCurt Doolittleit’s not hard to single (((them))) out.Feb 2, 2019, 12:51 PMTHERE IS ONLY ONE SOURCE OF LIBERTY: PERMISSION OF THOSE WHO HAVE SOVEREIGNTY.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 17:28:00 UTC

  • do you need an ideology other than winning?

    do you need an ideology other than winning?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 08:27:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090889264097832960

    Reply addressees: @Jake38109894

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090834786401296385


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090834786401296385

  • not so much on our side but their own interests, which is the same thing. mexico

    not so much on our side but their own interests, which is the same thing. mexico only outlier.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 03:25:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090813223056666625

    Reply addressees: @MGroyper

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090808840302538758


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090808840302538758

  • It doesn’t matter who is running in the next presidential election – because we

    It doesn’t matter who is running in the next presidential election – because we aren’t going to have one. Ever again. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 00:13:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090764955828264960

  • by John Mark The only thing I’d clarify about this is that there are a couple ar

    by John Mark

    The only thing I’d clarify about this is that there are a couple areas where the Left has been operating in reality better than the Right. So:

    1. Copy the Left’s tactic of gossip rally ridicule shame? No. Maybe to help win an election as a short-term play to buy us time, but not as a long-term solution. (The solution is outlaw pollution of the informational commons with lies.)

    2. Copy the Left’s understanding that identity politics wins, and that racial identity is a more powerful petsuasive force for most people (especially nonwhites) than any political ideology or set of ideas? Yes. The Right has tried to be race-blind with disastrous consequences. The Left’s reality-based success with this (colonize us with nonwhites & play identity politics with them) fools many right-wingers, because the Left lies about race, but their *actions* & strategy are more in line with reality in this area than the Right’s have been. We must learn from them in this area. (Race matters in political persuasion for nonwhites, more than anything else. We must deal with this reality.)

    3. The Left understands that it is all about holding the reins of power, not about “principle” or teaching people. Whoever makes the rules, rules. Whoever makes the rules, gets what they want. They go straight for the jugular: power. Without regard for anything else. Meanwhile, the Right has been trying to “be principled” and teach people (to explain/educate our way to victory). This is a mistake – truth matters not unless truth-enforcers have power and make the rules. Principles mean nothing without the power to enforce them. The Right must learn from the Left in this area.

    4. The Left knows how to be intolerant, to punish its enemies swiftly and harshly. Certain parts of the Right have tried to embrace tolerance (libertarians, classical liberals), with the predictable result that classical liberals and libertarians have zero power. The Right must learn from the Left in this area.

    What confuses the Right is that everything that comes out of the Left’s mouth is a lie. Their communication is all gossip rally ridicule shame (feminine). And we rightly say, “That is not us.” But then we look around and say, “Why do they have all the institutional power?” Well, because their *actions* (strategy/tactics) have been more in line with reality than the Right’s.

    So yes, the alt-right’s “let’s do ridicule better than the Left” is not our long-term answer. But we must recognize the areas where the Left has operated in reality better than we have, and course correct. Without losing our essence (truth).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 22:36:00 UTC