DEFINE “POWER”
The ability to alter the probability of outcomes by force, remuneration, promise of inclusion-exclusion, or combination thereof, in competition with others able to do the same.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:34:37 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424725273197721
The difference is in whether you view the police doing your job for you, or you view the police doing a job you wouldn’t do, and don’t want them to.
“Commons.”
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:34:17 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424723961373802
A NATIONAL SOCIALIST, A FASCIST, AN AUTHORITARIAN, A MONARCHIST?
—“Also I saw an earlier post of yours, do you disavow NS? if so, why?”—
I am absolutely a national socialist in the french sense, (real) but not the fascist sense (nonsense ideology.)
I am a fascist in the intolerant and economic and rule of law sense, not in the ideological (stupid) sense.
I am an authoritarian in the rule of law of natural law sense, not the discretionary sense.
I am a monarchist in the production of commons sense under veto by the people OR the veto over commons production by the people sense.
in other words i think the time where people had lost religion but could adopt a hokey ideological religion has past.
ancestors are enough if you have worthy ancestors.
we do.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:30:31 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424709136506064
— More by Igor Rogov —
One of the major (theoretical) dividing lines between Fascism of and National Socialism is that Fascist doctrine openly proclaimed that democratic majority (which at the time meant proletariat+peasantry) could not rule the human society. Instead, aristocratic, progressive, intellectual minority of the best people nation could produce has an obligation to rule benevolently, listening to the concerns of the masses and negating all the ills that gave rise to Social-democratic doctrines, Marxism and alike.
Not quite so with National Socialists, who engaged in lengthy party building process and came to power as a result of democratic elections, mobilizing and expressing the popular opinions of majority, not the daring march on Rome of some upstarts. For National Socialists it is vital to channel the will of the national masses, – not via slow and inefficient democratic institutions, but by the leader, who is “man of the people” and perfectly accessible. As such, he gives an example to his party comrades, who are also required to be friends of the people.
This distinction was apparent not only in theoretical constructs, but in practical arrangements in Italy, – fascists were closely engaged with an old European aristocracy, while German National socialists were assembling in Beer Gardens among the simplest folks and preferred to promote the loyal upstarts from the lower classes. The division between Mussolini and Hitler is also clear – first positioned himself as an intellectual and expressed his scorn about simple-mindedness of Hitler’s writings and the low culture of Nazi party and Germany itself, while Mussolini and the Fascists were later seen as too conservative by the National Socialists and too attached to superficial theatricality instead of radical social reforms.
(CD: yep)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:28:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424702347752616
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424701403641068
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
—” CAN YOU DEFINE THE DIFFERENCES IN NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND FASCISM?”— Let’s put fascism in series so that we can disambiguate it. Market Meritocracy: the anglo and dutch method of civil organization (made possible by extensive trade in the absence of a strong state, and presence of talented economic classes, and endless opportunity for all.) Communism: state seizure of the means of production by the underclasses and equidistribution of production by ‘need’. (Jewish – Envious, destructive ) National Socialism: state intervention in internal production, and direction of returns to the commons for kin: via positiva care. (french – pragmatic) Fascism: Defense of the commons from non-kin – via-negativa defense. (Italian – ideological ) Combination of both national socialism and fascism (Germany – Secular Theological ) Technological advancement had made possible the direction of new wealth from the industrial revolution to the advancement of groups. The debate was over: … empires (successfully transformed nations (britain, america) -vs- … the old backward nations (continental europe) -vs- ….classes (the failed nations (jewish – universalist)). Which we can see as not terribly complicated in retrospect: the rational choice of peoples to respond to change in material circumstances dependent upon their extant condition. Fascism consists in the pursuit of Autarky (economic and resource independence) under a corporation called the state, which represents an extended tribe of people (nation) by direct intervention with industry and trade to give preference to autarkic exchanges and prevention of externalization of gains of resources and production despite pricing signals that would normally instruct members of any given industry to operate efficiently by buying by price alone. Fascism provides a merger of the state and industry such that industry adopts autarkic pricing, buying within the country, rather than market pricing. National Socialism was a response to Market Meritocracy, where the same opportunities were not available to all, in an historically authoritarian state with vast bureaucratic organs both secular and theological. Fascism was and is EXPLICITLY racial national tribal because it arose in RESPONSE to communism. Germany was exceptionally talented in all aspects but needed to defend herself, and direct new wealth to the expansion of commons. Communism(Socialism) was a response to both given the backwardness of the classes and states, and gave jews, ‘intellectuals’ and underclasses a means of using the bottom to gain power against the middle which they envied. in particular communism was a means by which jewish minority could replace the nobility, seize power in the russian empire, which was the most backward, with the largest poor population, and was in turmoil because of the war, and the need to use ‘bodies’ in that war to compensate for the backwardness of industry and state.
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424701403641068
—” CAN YOU DEFINE THE DIFFERENCES IN NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND FASCISM?”—
Let’s put fascism in series so that we can disambiguate it.
Market Meritocracy: the anglo and dutch method of civil organization (made possible by extensive trade in the absence of a strong state, and presence of talented economic classes, and endless opportunity for all.)
Communism: state seizure of the means of production by the underclasses and equidistribution of production by ‘need’. (Jewish – Envious, destructive )
National Socialism: state intervention in internal production, and direction of returns to the commons for kin: via positiva care. (french – pragmatic)
Fascism: Defense of the commons from non-kin – via-negativa defense. (Italian – ideological )
Combination of both national socialism and fascism (Germany – Secular Theological )
Technological advancement had made possible the direction of new wealth from the industrial revolution to the advancement of groups.
The debate was over:
… empires (successfully transformed nations (britain, america)
-vs-
… the old backward nations (continental europe)
-vs-
….classes (the failed nations (jewish – universalist)).
Which we can see as not terribly complicated in retrospect: the rational choice of peoples to respond to change in material circumstances dependent upon their extant condition.
Fascism consists in the pursuit of Autarky (economic and resource independence) under a corporation called the state, which represents an extended tribe of people (nation) by direct intervention with industry and trade to give preference to autarkic exchanges and prevention of externalization of gains of resources and production despite pricing signals that would normally instruct members of any given industry to operate efficiently by buying by price alone.
Fascism provides a merger of the state and industry such that industry adopts autarkic pricing, buying within the country, rather than market pricing.
National Socialism was a response to Market Meritocracy, where the same opportunities were not available to all, in an historically authoritarian state with vast bureaucratic organs both secular and theological.
Fascism was and is EXPLICITLY racial national tribal because it arose in RESPONSE to communism. Germany was exceptionally talented in all aspects but needed to defend herself, and direct new wealth to the expansion of commons.
Communism(Socialism) was a response to both given the backwardness of the classes and states, and gave jews, ‘intellectuals’ and underclasses a means of using the bottom to gain power against the middle which they envied.
in particular communism was a means by which jewish minority could replace the nobility, seize power in the russian empire, which was the most backward, with the largest poor population, and was in turmoil because of the war, and the need to use ‘bodies’ in that war to compensate for the backwardness of industry and state.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:28:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424701403641068
But Liberals don’t make arguments. They lick the argumentative ice cream to poison the market for political discourse.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:13:26 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424641928298252
THE RIGHT THAT WON’T FIGHT
(they’re dead weight)
—“Yeah this is a major problem with the prepper community on the right. They have tricked themselves into thinking that an economic collapse is coming and that it will grant them an opportunity to obtain sovereignty from the federal government. In reality, as long as the federal government is able to maintain their power and legitimacy, the economy will continue to operate fine. (And we will continue to be conquered) … It’s just a means of coping with their loss. My Dad’s been doing it for the past 10 years.”—Jacob Smith
Which is the conversation I want to have.
I see them as just cowering.
They are pretending that inaction will solve the problem for them.
Between the churchies who pray to cover their cowering and the peppers who plan cover their to cowering, it’s gotta be just us pagans that want to fight.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:11:20 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424633676271211
WAIT FOR A TRIGGER EVENT OR MAKE A TRIGGER EVENT
The left knows we are waiting for a trigger event, and are trying to win by delay and deceive (chinese style) until it is too late for us to act.
We are going to act, when enough of us choose to.
The rest who are more cowardly will follow.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:05:04 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424609084577925
“WE FEW, WE HAPPY FEW…”
We need very few of us. If We come to your part of the world, and get ten, we’ll get a hundred. If we get a hundred we’ll get a thousand. If we get a thousand we”ll get ten thousand. If we get ten then fifty, fifty one hundred.. etc. And at that point the earth will start shaking…
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:04:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424608014075374
FROM THE PIRATES’ HANDBOOK
All y’all need to do is know:
a) where are the food warehouses, gun stores and ammo, gasoline, propane, and if possible, construction explosives located.
b) where are the substations, rail lines, bridges, and underground gas mains, and how to break, disable, or block them.
c) if possible where are the major data centers, and the nearest bulldozers and backhoes.
d) ATM Machines, Banks, Depositories, and Central Bank processing.
e) the number of men necessary to overwhelmingly take each of them and retreat into ‘the mist’. Triple that number of men, triple the time you think, triple the risk.
f) make a plan for using a small number of guys to down the power, take the cash, warn the first responders to stay home, then start fires until the cows come home.
The military uses darkness and distance. The revolution will use ‘silence’ (lack of communication, power, transport, resources) and fire, and the ‘proletariat’ so to speak will do the rest
Then once they’re exposed its house to house. I won’t go into the dark side so to speak. But this isn’t about winning control. It’s about cleaning house.
If its about cleaning house then maybe the opposition will require less convincing.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:04:33 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424607006900353