Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Jun 28, 2019, 9:32 AM THE TRUTH IS ENOUGH. —I’m a universal Nationalist. A wor

    Jun 28, 2019, 9:32 AM
    THE TRUTH IS ENOUGH.

    —I’m a universal Nationalist. A world of small homogenous high trust nation states. I advocate religious, political, legal, and cultural zero tolerance, ‘domestication’ (full integration) of ashkenazim who choose so, and repatriation of those who do not. And the reason is because – while jewish history has been laundered, as much as white history soiled, and Jews, like women, whose cognition they bred, lie like hell to avoid facing the reality of their historical behaviors, and like like hell to avoid taking responsibility for them. I know all too well that the punishment (persecution) was always and everywhere earned ten fold. And that’s just the reality of it. Russian/Eastern european history is the best and most suppressed example. But there is no condition counter to it in all of western european history. How do I know? I read legal(empirical) not literary(fictional) history.—

    Excellence and Heroism
    Truth and Duty
    Sovereignty and Reciprocity
    The Law and Jury
    and Markets in Everything:
    Association, Cooperation, Reproduction, Production, Commons, Polities, Nations.

    The truth is enough….
    … and separate, oppose, conquer, rule, or end those who display, speak, or act otherwise.

    The Oath of Transcendent Man.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:08:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426274991830724

  • “… Curt, you’re a … “— I’m an aristocratic ethnocentric nationalist under

    —“… Curt, you’re a … “—

    I’m an aristocratic ethnocentric nationalist under rule of natural law, with a professional bureaucracy, a monarchy of last resort, and a militia. Which is, quite literally, a secular version of our history from time immemorial. I mean, the fact that I”m writing western civilization’s strategy and philosophy in scientific terms seems to escape people.

    Hosting (farming) subgroups that live together in communities (plantations) has been something we have done for millennia (Quarters, Ghettos). Its profitable. That’s different from equal rights so to speak and devoid of political rights.

    Aesthetically I’m an elitist. Morally I deeply feel noblesse oblige. Pragmatically I see us profiting from the domestication of man. and critically I see that we had our century of european civil war, and left our job incomplete. But other than the middle east, the rest of the world has followed us – if kicking and screaming – into the modernity we created.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:58:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426235900886979

  • “Voting is a tool to reduce violence amongst a warrior class within a polity. Mo

    –“Voting is a tool to reduce violence amongst a
    warrior class within a polity. Modern war
    opened the warrior class to all men and
    therefore the franchise was then extended to
    them. Women are not, as a class, effective
    warriors yet they have been granted the
    rights of fighting men.”–Noah J Revoy

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:58:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426233737644983

  • (…continued) Why? “The desire for equality under poverty, monopoly under the h

    (…continued)

    Why? “The desire for equality under poverty, monopoly under the herd, authority over markets, and feminine dysgenia over masculine eugenia.:
    “The Mindless Equalitarian Dysgenic Herd.”

    There is and can never be equality. The demand for equality is to devolve mankind to one’s own lowest level – as an animal. The demand of aristocracy is to evolve mankind into one’s own level – transcend the animal into reason. THe anglo enlightenment experiment has been one of attempting to raise man into an ‘aristocracy of everyone’ and it has failed because only our kin appear able to do so – and even then some men and many women resist it.

    The reason Jewish Christians are “Cucks’ and do not fight against the enemy is because their debt, loyalty, and fealty, is to the ancestral enemy of our people – and not to Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.

    The reason Aryan Christians are ‘not cucks’ is that we fight against the enemy because our debt, loyalty, reality is to our ancestors, Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.

    Choose Aryan Christianity of Kin and our persistence, or Semitic Christianity of the Enemy against our kin and your extermination.

    I am An Aryan, An Aristotelian, A Heathen, A Christian.

    Because that is all I can be, while maintaining the debt, loyalty, and fealty to my kin, my people, my ancestors, nature, the universe, and transcendence of man into the great gods our ancients imagined.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:48:00 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426193407615382

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM I am, first, and foremost: 1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism), 2) Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), an;d 3) Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature). I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt. I can however, be: 4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I: a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason; b) claim belief in a falsehood; c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin. Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks (a) abandon reason, (b) claim belief in falsehood, and (c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin. The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is: (a) False promise(lying), (b) Sophism(lying), (c) Straw Manning(lying), (d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth), (e) Denial(lying), (f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial. There is no difference between: (a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and; (b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression) The First wave of Abrahamists created (a) Judaism to undermine, (b) Christianity to undermine further, and (c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened. … Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason. The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts: (a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism. (b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness. … Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!). (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947

  • (… continued) Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are

    (… continued)

    Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are of merit, but that we must preserve collective care taking while at the same time limiting the reproduction of the undomesticated animal classes who would reverse the past 50K years of evolutionary progress from animal to human.

    Women are the greatest mass murderers in history, since exposure and dumping of babies and children is the most common source of mortality in human history. Men and their wars are nothing by comparison. The great plagues are nothing by comparison. Yet when women and betas like you are able to force costs upon the rest of us, to produce and immigration dysgenia, you no longer limit your reproduction, no longer delay your reproduction, no longer are denied reproduction, no longer face the hard choice of harsh winters or sexual impulse.

    So no. I’s not an ‘opinion’.
    I’m not stating a difference of opinion or value – I’m stating a FACT.
    Dysgenia is measurable.
    The consequences are measurable.

    You are nothing more than a repeat of the jewish-christian-muslim destruction of the ancient world using the same vocabulary arguments and strategy differing only in using pseudoscience and sophism this time versus supernaturalism and sophism the last.

    You and all like you are the source of dark ages.

    You and all like you are a cancer upon this earth – an uncontrolled dysgenic out-of-control, resource consuming disease consuming society, civilization, man, the planet, and the entirety of human potential with your infantilism.

    You and all like you are a disease upon us all.
    A Cancer. A Cancer we are willing to separate from and let run its course.
    But a cancer we must isolate, inoculate, prevent, and cure our people of.

    So when we say ‘be a man’ we mean ‘save yourselves, our people, our civilization, mankind, the planet and the entirety of human potential from that cancerous non-rational infantilized dysenic group we call marxists, socialists, feminists, postmodernists, politically correct, and inadequate.’

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:11:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425576276514819

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (… continued) So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You only sense it is a good. The libertarian does not know why he feels the way he does, he only senses it is good. The conservative does not know why he feels the way he does, only that he senses it is good. However, in the long run the conservative is the only one making use of all available knowledge over the long run. Everything liberals thought would be true in their pseudoscientific rage against the darwinian machine has been false. Man was no oppressed. Semi domesticated human animals like all other animals we domesticated, have been eugenically governed in eastern and western civilization – largely through climate, competitors, and manorialism to produce society with superior distributions. ANd your ‘privilege’ of hyperconsumption and violation of the many compromises between the generations, genders, classes, and masculine-feminine minds, was made and still is made, possible by those who domesticated your ancestors – and apparently failed to domesticate your line. What do we do? We are sufficiently wealthy to separate and go our own ways, and return to our process of speciation. You may pursue your dysgenic goals, and we will pursue our eugenic goals, and we will rapidly see what occurs to a ‘liberal, feminine, redistributionist, equalitarian’ order without the libertarians and conservatives striving at all times to preserve what they and their ancestors have made, while you do nothing but continue to overpopulate a planet, drive down the averages, and reduce you and yours to yet another failed effeminate equalitarian utopia. You will not however take us down with you. (We would rather …. revolt and end you.) We will continue to rebuild our society from the catastrophe of century of pseudoscience (marx, freud, adorno, cantor, derrida, chomsky et al) and their marxism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, feminism, and denialism – and we will continue to build ours on the centuries of western tradition (aristotle, hume, darwin, menger, and the common law of reciprocity. So that is what noah and I are talking about. Him about finding happiness in the present, and I about how to solve the political problem of your feminine dysgenic animal desire to reverse our evolutionary progress and turn us to state of animals, ignorance, and poverty. So no it is not an act of GSRRM to state what I have stated. It is a scientific description of the cognitive processes and their dysgenic (herd) outcomes that you seek to implement despite knowing very little, thinking very little, and feeling only what an animal feels. Women feel as they do for the simple reason that at maturity their nervous system develops into a shared one so that they are willing to bear any cost to preserve a costly offspring regardless of merit. (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

  • THE GAINS TO BE HAD FLUSHING AND CUTTING TIES WITH WEAKNESS AND TREACHERY —“Th

    THE GAINS TO BE HAD FLUSHING AND CUTTING TIES WITH WEAKNESS AND TREACHERY

    —“The harder you go against enemies; the more of your own, moved by sympathy or weakness, will defect to the other side. This too, can have positive returns, up to a point. But there is probably also a limit beyond which it is counter productive. The main risk is endangering the eventual achievement of any kind of victory. The secondary risk is of achieving one at too high a cost. But to the side of the optimum on which we presently find ourselves, there are still gains to be picked up in flushing out and cutting ties with weakness and treachery among our supposed ingroup.”—Ely Harman

    We don’t want ALL our own. This is an OPPORTUNITY to exit them not a challenge to be overcome.

    (eli as master of the game, writing in poetry)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:06:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425558507118949

  • @joehemp One does not have such a choice, since all territory is always and ever

    @joehemp One does not have such a choice, since all territory is always and everywhere held by force and only by force sufficient to deter the strongest group willing to act to seize it.

    I don’t do silly people.

    Libertarians are supposed to be the people that understand markets.

    Polities are a product like any other.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 21:53:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425037015447586

  • THERE IS GOING TO BE A REVOLUTION – I KNOW. BECAUSE I’M ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO WI

    THERE IS GOING TO BE A REVOLUTION – I KNOW. BECAUSE I’M ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO WILL START IT.

    1. Moral men need a reason for rebellion. (they have it: rule by credit, familicide, genocide, culturecide, civilization. )

    2. They need an institutional solution implementable as law, to demand that resolves their issues, (we have it) and to which they can feel, claim, argue, and fight for, as a moral high ground (they can).

    3. They need a plan of transition to the new institutional system that they can envision bringing to fruition. (we have it)

    4. They need a strategy and a plan of action making use of available means by which to conduct a rebellion that will succeed. (we have it)

    5. They need an opportunity to seize under which the revolution can be visibly successful (we do – no civilization in history has been more fragile)

    6. They need a communication system by which to coordinate their efforts over large territories that are impossible for standard police, emergency, and military to concentrate power against. (we have it).

    7. If possible they need an icon behind which to anthropomorphize their actions (we have it)

    (Some of us have been at this a while)

    Sovereignty. Rule of Natural Judge Discovered, Common Law. Direct Democracy over a Market Commons with Houses for the Classes. Direct redistribution of proceeds from the commons, and liquidity from the treasury to the citizenry. An end to Fiat Credit Capitalism, an end to Politicians, and an end to propaganda, misrepresentation, pseudoscience, and deceit in the informational commons (public discourse). And the creation of opportunities in every state by the decentralization of power, and the devolution of the federal government to regions.

    The American Empire was useful in the conquest of the continent. It was useful in the preservation of the British Empire’s patterns of finance and trade. It was useful in the defeat of world communism. But it is not useful in the defeat of Islamism, nor our own suicidal pseudoscientific secular humanism – it is the sponsor of both in the deep state’s pursuit of customers from both.

    We are going to end the empire. Preserve the military as overwhelmingly powerful domestic rather than overstretched international force. Preserve the systems of insurers of last resort. But eliminate the discretion of the federal government over our daily lives. We are not equal. We do not have equal desires. And both the European imperial and American imperial systems must end. Or like all empires, they will kill the host that made them possible.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 21:44:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424998459531497

  • THE ECONOMICS AND ETHICS OF ENDING DEMOCRACY —“He [Doolittle] understands the

    THE ECONOMICS AND ETHICS OF ENDING DEMOCRACY

    —“He [Doolittle] understands the what, but not the why. People are being dumbed down not because they are forced to, but because they desire to be. We naturally seek the path of least resistance, the easy and uncomplicated.”—Jeni Bolotovski

    (…Aside from the fact that yes, dumbing people down, eradicating their history, traditions, customs, and laws, has been an intentional ambition of the marxist, socialist, postmodernist program….)

    I would frame it differently as we seek the greatest return in the shortest time at the least effort, with the greatest certainty, at the lowest risk.

    (Return, Time, Effort, Certainty, Risk.)

    And that at present the possibility of marginal improvement for marginal increase in knowledge is questionable.

    And the only harm is that it makes democracy impossible, and requires we return to demonstrated proficiency before obtaining influence over others.

    In other words, without incentive to work for the franchise, or to work for membership in consumption (the middle class) then there is no return on reduction of ignorance.

    And I agree. Ergo. Return to demonstrated ability to participate in the franchise (application of violence/force by means of voting).

    We can either educate everyone sufficiently to participate in those decisions that require knowledge of math, science, history, economics, psychology, sociology, and law – or, recognizing the failure our our experiment – we can once again limit participation in decisions to those that demonstrate it by achievement (economically self sufficient intergenerational families free of criminal activities, owners of business (small) and industry(large) who risk personal capital, and territorial governors (cities vs territories), and a decider of last resort (monarchy) who has veto power over all of the above.

    So I agree….

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:37:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424737939020144

  • ON POWER You have power (influence) because others give it to you. They give it

    ON POWER

    You have power (influence) because others give it to you. They give it to you because it’s produces higher returns than others available to give it to. If you don’t have power, it’s because no one sees value in giving it to you. The reason fascists and communists don’t have power, is because anyone that stupid can’t be trusted with it any more than a child can be trusted running with scissors or playing with matches.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:37:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424735030375993