Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in me

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 11:22:00 UTC

  • CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGE

    CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC

    For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire.

    Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire: experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards.

    Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).

    What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both.

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.

    The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic, social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs.

    So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:43:00 UTC

  • CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGE

    CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC

    For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire.

    Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire:experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards.

    Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).

    What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both.

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.

    The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic,social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs.

    So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:42:00 UTC

  • 4) So I’m staying on message. (a) there is no need for foreign students – its a

    4) So I’m staying on message. (a) there is no need for foreign students – its a means of universities not paying domestic rates for research assistants when nearly all research is frankly little more than ‘labor’. (See E. Weinstein) (b) every single chinese national is a risk.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 23:34:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222301932783534081

    Reply addressees: @party_blanket

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222301563357712384


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @party_blanket 2) The chinese didn’t ‘do this to their people’, instead they failed to act quickly because of fear of punishment from Beijing (as usual). 3) My concern is the ongoing soft warfare duplicating that of the soviets against our research sectors, and the same against our economy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1222301563357712384


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @party_blanket 2) The chinese didn’t ‘do this to their people’, instead they failed to act quickly because of fear of punishment from Beijing (as usual). 3) My concern is the ongoing soft warfare duplicating that of the soviets against our research sectors, and the same against our economy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1222301563357712384

  • 2) The chinese didn’t ‘do this to their people’, instead they failed to act quic

    2) The chinese didn’t ‘do this to their people’, instead they failed to act quickly because of fear of punishment from Beijing (as usual). 3) My concern is the ongoing soft warfare duplicating that of the soviets against our research sectors, and the same against our economy.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 23:32:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222301563357712384

    Reply addressees: @party_blanket

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222301118329344001


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @party_blanket 1) We have at least four competing theories making the rounds. These two theories can be intercausal – or not. Either one can be the cause – or not. However, the chinese are researching bioweapons, and (as NPR is reporting) the smuggling of the coronavirus did happen.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1222301118329344001


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @party_blanket 1) We have at least four competing theories making the rounds. These two theories can be intercausal – or not. Either one can be the cause – or not. However, the chinese are researching bioweapons, and (as NPR is reporting) the smuggling of the coronavirus did happen.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1222301118329344001

  • 1) We have at least four competing theories making the rounds. These two theorie

    1) We have at least four competing theories making the rounds. These two theories can be intercausal – or not. Either one can be the cause – or not. However, the chinese are researching bioweapons, and (as NPR is reporting) the smuggling of the coronavirus did happen.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 23:31:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222301118329344001

    Reply addressees: @party_blanket

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222299267148197891


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222299267148197891

  • $50k a month. He got 50k a MONTH to help the chinese weaponize a virus. Someone

    $50k a month. He got 50k a MONTH to help the chinese weaponize a virus.

    Someone offered me a duffel bag full of cash to do a job once. I couldn’t refuse. On the other hand, I turned him into the IRS as soon as it was over. Then oops! no more Bentley!

    Justice done for a profit.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 23:22:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222299021714378760

    Reply addressees: @StanGalerius @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222297880830017536


    IN REPLY TO:

    @StanGalerius

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump Money gets in the of course.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222297880830017536

  • Why does the poll methodology state 800+ registered democrats but NOT the number

    Why does the poll methodology state 800+ registered democrats but NOT the number of registered republicans?
    The margin of error in random dials of cell and landlines for this many questions, with this many leading questions is worse than the hillary-trump variation.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 21:50:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222275659902394368

    Reply addressees: @Amy_Siskind

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222254226635620354


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Amy_Siskind

    NEW: 75% of Americans – including 49% of Republicans-want to hear from witnesses in the impeachment trial, just 20% do not. https://t.co/u8Hrjo7uQ1

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222254226635620354

  • CNN is the enemy of the american people, the constitution, the natural law, and

    CNN is the enemy of the american people, the constitution, the natural law, and western civlization – by design.

    You know what’s going to happen again?
    You never, ever learn from your mistakes.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 21:00:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222263197870239745

    Reply addressees: @CNN @kylieatwood

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222262496519692289


    IN REPLY TO:

    @CNN

    President Trump praised Mike Pompeo for berating an NPR reporter, saying the secretary of state “did a good job on her.” CNN’s @kylieatwood reports. https://t.co/EuLdbSYFPu https://t.co/hPVfpkMX1r

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222262496519692289

  • QUESTION? —“Will people rise up before it’s too late?”— If you got a call to

    QUESTION?

    —“Will people rise up before it’s too late?”—

    If you got a call today from me or someone like me, to show up in a certain town at a certain date would you go? Would you have gone five years ago? Would you go today? Will you go in 90 days?

    If the answer to that question is anything other than “I’ll show up” then you’re the f–king problem, so shut the f—k up.

    If the answer is “I’ll show up”, then we win.

    There is nothing in the world that can stop 100k.

    We are the largest army in the world.

    But only if hand-wringers show up.

    If you won’t show up then shut up.

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 15:31:00 UTC