I dunno guys. Michigan right now. Raleigh next. The 2A guys are in the lead. And it’s looking pretty good. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-30 16:57:00 UTC
I dunno guys. Michigan right now. Raleigh next. The 2A guys are in the lead. And it’s looking pretty good. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-30 16:57:00 UTC
The only way to start a revolution is via the second amendment battle over carrying arms, and our militia of every possible male, as the foundation of our civilization, and it is as sacred as is our law, and our religion.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-30 16:08:00 UTC
There is no law of war. If there is, it’s business not war. Much if not all of european warfare was business – control of agrarian income sources. We are not in a war of business today. We are in a war of survival as we have always been against the middle east- as india, africa, and china are in an eternal war against the middle east. But there is no law in war. There is no law in war of all against all (4gw), and there is no law in Total War (unlimited war) that includes immigration, invasion, combat, trade networks, economics, propaganda, culture, information. Judaism, Islam and China are engaged in lawless, war of all, total war against civilization – because they cannot compete against high trust commons producing civilizations for power, wealth OR status. As such our existence falsifies their entire histories and group strategie and civilizational self image.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-30 11:30:00 UTC
THINK STRATEGICALLY
Wars require strategy. Strategy requires sequences of objectives. Sequences of objectives require time and patience. Time and patience make possible successful application of tactics. To succeed in creating truth reciprocity, sovereignty, and self determination, we need POWER first. The power to suppress falsehood and power prohibit the suppression of truth. And to have power at scale we need the law. And to have the law we need the power to form the law. And to have the power to form the law we need power to demand the implementation of that law that suppresses falsehood, false promise, baiting into hazard, and that punishes the suppression of truth.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-29 15:34:00 UTC
TO PRODUCE UNITY – WE HAVE TO TALK TO EACH POLITICAL FACTION ON THEIR TERMS
I want to be able to respect different people with different intuitions, beliefs, and understandings. P-law and Nationalism and markets for polities for everyone is in everyone’s interest. Monopoly political orders are impossible and contrary to the natural right of self determination.
We are separating the african, muslim, christian, wn/natsoc, and mainstream ‘libertarian” discussions into individual groups because we lost most of the (silent) military people due to natsoc activity.
We must reach people on their own terms and build unity for DIFFERENT political orders under P-law: Let A Thousand Nations Bloom. And mixing muslim, christian, wn/natsoc, world government, antifa-marxist groups versus constitutionalist, civnat, social democratic, and traditional democratic groups prohibit outreach to one another.
Until enough people understand P in each faction, comprehension, cross conversation, and collective coopartion against our united enemy of the (((financial, media, entertainment, academy))) that seeks to destry our civilizations cannot be achieved.
Our mission is to reach everyone so that ‘separation’ is possible at the expense of the (((financial, media, entertainment, academy))) and state bureaucracy, and if separation is not possible then escalation to conflict is necessary.
But stifling the conversation before people understand their options is counter-productive. And so the only valuable arguments or ideas are those that are in fact arguments so to speak. And all you do when you cross paradigmatic boundaries is cloud the conversation – when P-law is UNIFYING across ALL PEOPLE who wish to live their lives as they do without imposing costs upon the way of life of others by doing so.
So understand your audience. The main feeds are mainstream (rule of law, monarchic, republican, democratic mixed economy,. Post Monopoly paradigms: Christian, Muslim, WN, NATSOC, Globalist, Antifa-Marxist content to those audiences and mainstream P-content to the mainstream audiences.
Thanks.
GROUPS
Female Propertarians:
Christian Propertarians:
Muslim/Secular Muslim and Propertarians
Continental African Propertarianism.
Mainstream Propertarians (rule of law)
Socialist and Left Propertarians
WN/NATSOC and Propertarians
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-29 13:33:00 UTC
I have battle on all sides. nazis/wn’s on one end, antifa/socialists on the other, christians/fundamentalists, Civic nationalists…. I do my thing.
Maybe it’s time to convert my main feed to read only and create a private forum for discussions by topic.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 18:06:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255196635262595073
Reply addressees: @mutedilettante
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255124068862357507
The right wing has not adopted postmodernism (it’s not possible) but has adopted the left’s use of the Alinsky method of undermining, including undermining sense-making, which is the female conflict strategy, which is the Jewish group competitive strategy that Alinsky formalized.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 03:36:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254977792200105984
Reply addressees: @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254546641970966530
WE ARE TRYING TO ARTICULATE “NATIONAL COMMONS-ISM”
by Luke Weinhagen
I have a suspicion that what many are grasping at within NatSoc is not a socialization of the economy but rather a commonization (not communization) of the government.
This is what the west was aimed at solving but without full-accounting under P’s complete description of property, government became just another marketable commodity under globalist capitalism.
What we are really trying to articulate is a form of National Commonsism.
The resistance to “socializing” any part of our civic under our current model of “governance as commodity” is it effectively means selling whatever was socialized to big interest and international agents. There is no trust.
National Commonsism == Kinship Capitalism == reciprocity protected by full-accounting
—
CD: Always count on luke for genius.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 10:53:00 UTC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_theory_of_party_competition?fbclid=IwAR3BK5jF37EXqv6jlwTrAdIt3yNQ863QTX0ZCieKCh60Q9_XQ6d3K0uah88ELITES CONTROL VOTING AS INVESTMENT IN STATE CONTROL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_theory_of_party_competition?
(via Joel Davis)Updated Apr 27, 2020, 7:49 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 07:49:00 UTC
oh no they won’t do the right thing. They’ll do the wrong thing and get hung for it until we discover the equilibrium of sufficient hanging. 😉 I suspect that’s a synonom for ‘frequently’
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 00:13:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254564237323710466
Reply addressees: @dormant511 @EricLiford @ekiekipatang
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254563867256074240