Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • (I like this one better as the Aristocratic Egalitarian Challenge) “I do not nee

    (I like this one better as the Aristocratic Egalitarian Challenge)

    “I do not need your permission to attack you.

    I don’t seek your negotiation, approval, or your consent,

    I seek your defeat. And I seek to defeat you completely.

    If you fear your defeat you may seek to understand,

    And if you come to understand, then you may pay restitution;

    And you may end your immoral words and deeds.

    But until you pay restitution, and end your immoral words and deeds,

    I will defeat you by words.

    if I cannot obtain your restitution with words.

    Then I will defeat you with violence, and take it from you.

    Because morality demands that I defeat you.”

    I’ve been working on this for a bit. Not quite there yet.

    It’s all sitting there in history to pick up and be converted into rational language. The problem is it’s wrapped in pseudo-religious poetry of the church. Economics is the language of morality. Even if economists use it to practice immorality.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-08 02:23:00 UTC

  • I AM AN ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIAN CHRISTIAN LIBERTARIAN It’s a very simple philos

    I AM AN ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIAN CHRISTIAN LIBERTARIAN

    It’s a very simple philosophy: Speak Truthfully. Respect Property-en-toto. Assist all who agree to liberty. Punish the wicked until you defeat them completely.

    SCORE?

    You are a: Objectivist Libertarian Total-Isolationist Nationalist Moderate

    Collectivism score: -100%

    Authoritarianism score: -67%

    Internationalism score: -100%

    Tribalism score: 33%

    Liberalism score: 0%

    THERE ARENT ANY MEANINGFUL ARISTOCRATIC QUESTIONS ON THE SURVEY. They assume the status quo.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-07 15:05:00 UTC

  • Moral memes matter

    Moral memes matter.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-07 06:20:00 UTC

  • You’re welcome to request your own approval, but I’m not interested in it. I’m i

    You’re welcome to request your own approval, but I’m not interested in it. I’m interested in defeat. We are interested in defeat. Ok? You had your shot. you were immoral so you failed. It’s time for moral men to defeat immoral men. And that includes you.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-06 12:17:00 UTC

  • Do no harm Expect no gifts. Earn all rewards. Punish the wicked

    Do no harm

    Expect no gifts.

    Earn all rewards.

    Punish the wicked.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-06 08:05:00 UTC

  • Most libertines are just raising arguments to justify free riding. Really. That’

    Most libertines are just raising arguments to justify free riding.

    Really. That’s all it is.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-04 14:17:00 UTC

  • damn… it’s not that you have a right to ancestral lands, (under narrow conditi

    damn… it’s not that you have a right to ancestral lands, (under narrow conditions), it is that you have a moral obligation to restore ancestral lands. Interesting….


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-02 17:51:00 UTC

  • SIMPLICITY: TRUTH IS ENOUGH Free speech in a culture of men who tell the truth i

    SIMPLICITY: TRUTH IS ENOUGH

    Free speech in a culture of men who tell the truth increases the velocity of cooperation and production. Free speech in a culture of men who systemically lie, by sophisticated means, temporarily increases consumption at the expense of trust and the consequential increases in innovation and production. In the 20th century science is somewhat immune from lying if not from their fascination with non-truthful speech, because so little (other than global warming) has been profitable to lie about and because like doctors and lawyers they protect their ‘ticket’ by persecuting offenders. It is this same ethic that is missing from politics. As such, without a systemic means of policing, free speech is simply a legalized endorsement of systematic lying for personal, organizational, political, and tribal gain. The only means we have of such a defense at the extra-professional scale of general political speech is the law. We may never be able to speak or know the ultimate truth on any matter, but thanks to science we have learned how to speak truthfully, and truthful speech is s required wherever others may come to harm, and politics, as the organized application of violence, is by definition the use of harm whenever used deceitfully.

    Truth is enough The law is enough. Property rights are enough. And voluntary Exchange is a sufficient vehicle for the achievement of human wants and needs.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-02 16:43:00 UTC

  • SELLING DYSGENIA FOR PROFIT You just prohibit lying, by requiring truthful speec

    SELLING DYSGENIA FOR PROFIT

    You just prohibit lying, by requiring truthful speech. We do not allow for fomenting a conspiracy, why should we allow for the fomenting of theft for the purpose of profiting from the sale of dysgenia? I man, that’s the left’s program right? Sell dysgenia for profit? SO, unwind it by merely replacing free speech with free truthful speech. One cannot bring a harmful product, physical, service, or speech, to market without warranty against the production of harm.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-02 16:11:00 UTC

  • TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT RESPECTING OTHERS: 1) Which? (a) Every man must be treated w

    TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT RESPECTING OTHERS:

    1) Which?

    (a) Every man must be treated with respect or he may punish you for disrespect.

    Or

    (b) Every man must earn respect before he may punish you for disrespect.

    2) Which produces a more scientific result? (a) or (b)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-02 14:50:00 UTC