(I like this one better as the Aristocratic Egalitarian Challenge) “I do not nee

(I like this one better as the Aristocratic Egalitarian Challenge)

“I do not need your permission to attack you.

I don’t seek your negotiation, approval, or your consent,

I seek your defeat. And I seek to defeat you completely.

If you fear your defeat you may seek to understand,

And if you come to understand, then you may pay restitution;

And you may end your immoral words and deeds.

But until you pay restitution, and end your immoral words and deeds,

I will defeat you by words.

if I cannot obtain your restitution with words.

Then I will defeat you with violence, and take it from you.

Because morality demands that I defeat you.”

I’ve been working on this for a bit. Not quite there yet.

It’s all sitting there in history to pick up and be converted into rational language. The problem is it’s wrapped in pseudo-religious poetry of the church. Economics is the language of morality. Even if economists use it to practice immorality.