—“The highest tax the moral man pays into the commons is to duel and defeat the immoral man.”—
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-30 07:52:00 UTC
—“The highest tax the moral man pays into the commons is to duel and defeat the immoral man.”—
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-30 07:52:00 UTC
SIGNALING WITH HONOR
Not stealing, not cheating, not free-riding, not obscurantizing, not rallying and shaming, not lying, and not having to engage in fighting -other than a duel- and not engaging in conspiracy are signals of superiority. Stealing, cheating, free-riding, obscurantizing, rallying and shaming, lying and having to engage fighting – other than as a duel, or engaging in conspiracy – are signals of inferiority. One can survive by either means. But one is demonstrably superior in his abilities if he need not, and demonstrably inferior in his abilities if he must.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-30 07:17:00 UTC
THE HIGH COST OF TRUTH AND THE HIGH RETURN OF CIVIC SOCIETY
What if neither state, academy, religion or media could speak falsehoods into the commons (audience) without fear of legal retaliation and necessity of restitution? What if state, academy, religion and media had to warrant their product as all other products are warranted?
What if religious could state what prophets believed, but could not claim it was true, only myth, parable, and metaphor? What if professors could not teach falsehoods and had to warrant as such? What if philosophers could not rely upon conflation, loading, framing and overloading?
What if we taught truth-telling, history, and literature again as well as science and mathematics? Meaning grammar, rhetoric, observation, and testimony?
Given that the Flynn effect appears to be caused by the spread of scientific methods of thought – general rules rather than individual uses – why wouldn’t we experience the same expansion of human capability by the institution of truth telling that we have experienced with literacy, general education, and science?
Wouldn’t truth telling be the next obvious stage in pacification, continuing humanity’s long history of incrementally suppressing parasitism and forcing people into productive rather than parasitic behaviors in order to survive?
What is the price you would be willing to pay to remove lies from public discourse as we have largely eliminated deception from contract, and fraud from products and services? Why should we not cleanse the commons the same as we have cleansed the private sector.
Why not end the marxist, socialist, and postmodern era’s profligate deception as a means of uniting academy and state at the expense of civic society and church? Is telling the truth so high a cost that you would preserve the various means of deception that seek to restore the authoritarianism of the church?
Truth is enough. But liars love their lies, and the utility of their lying. They argue that a beneficial lie is better than a difficult truth. But when in history has an increased tax – a cost we must pay to produce a commons – not a burden for us?
Truth is a high tax to pay.
But with that tax we create liberty, prosperity, and a better mankind.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-29 05:26:00 UTC
………………………..THE CROSS
..
……………………THOSE WHO FIGHT
……………………….Organize Property
…………………………….Violence
……………………….(what we may not)
…………………………………..|
…………………………………..|
.THOSE WHO SPEAK —|— THOSE WHO DISCOVER
…..Organize Norms…………….Organize Knowledge
……….Gossip………………………………..Truth
…….(what should)…………|……………(what is)
…………………………………..|
…………………………………..|
…………………THOSE WHO TRADE
…………………..Organize Production
………………………………(how)
…………………………………..|
…………………………………..|
…………………THOSE WHO PRODUCE
…………………..Labor and Consumption
…………………………………..|
…………………………………..|
…………………..THOSE WHO CARE
…………………………Reproduction
……………………Nurture and Hospital
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-27 05:42:00 UTC
Repeat after me:
“I agree to rule; to rule of law; to rule by the prohibition of free riding upon the productivity of others; to take responsibility for rule; to pay the costs of my rule; and to deny others the ability to rule, so that I, my kin, my people, and mankind, may evolve in sovereignty, productivity and prosperity. I am man. I am sovereign. And I promise to be warrior, sheriff, judge and legislator.”
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-26 10:44:00 UTC
Every Man A Sheriff. Every Man a Legislator. Every Man Sovereign.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-22 10:32:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/657142517423566848
Reply addressees: @curtdoolittle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/657142030997565440
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
GOD FORBID WE PUNISH THE WICKED… https://t.co/z6Ho8U2yR9
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/657142030997565440
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
GOD FORBID WE PUNISH THE WICKED… https://t.co/z6Ho8U2yR9
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/657142030997565440
—“Hanging liars costs so little and the results are priceless.”—Zachary Faulkner
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-21 01:30:00 UTC
Writing propertarian arguments is no different than the practice of geometry. You start with claims, identify the property the individuals wish to acquire, and the discounts they seek to obtain it by – usually in excess of the discounts obtained through productive exchange, and then translate negotiation strategies into the same. That’s it. I mean, it takes practice just like geometry. But it’s not terribly difficult. The principle problem is overcoming bias.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 05:15:00 UTC
—“Not all property is physical and not all property is private – truth is intellectual property held in commons, and dishonesty causes damage to this shared property.”—Arkan Nathanael
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-18 03:58:00 UTC
TRUTH
Americans have too long tolerated lying in commerce and in public discourse, and instead of evicerating libel, slander, and fraud, we can dramatically improve our lives by requiring truthfulness. Amazon takes a great step forward in creating an example of the use of marketing to commit fraud.
—“AMAZON, the world’s largest online marketplace, is suing more than 1,000 people suspected of selling fake reviews in one of the biggest legal actions to uncover hidden identities on the internet.
The web giant is mounting the unprecedented court action to strip 1,114 alleged fake reviewers of their anonymity and force them to pay damages for the “manipulation and deception” of Amazon customers, according to court documents filed in America on Friday.
It is the first time any company has taken action against its own reviewers on this scale, according to legal experts, and could have far-reaching implications for privacy and the way consumer websites are policed.”—–
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-18 03:41:00 UTC