Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • NATURAL LAW ON ASYMMETRIC IMMIGRATION, STERILIZATION, AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT -“W

    NATURAL LAW ON ASYMMETRIC IMMIGRATION, STERILIZATION, AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

    -“When it comes to criminality there is always a path to redemption that can be based on effort and will and not just time.”-

    No (and all competent psychologists will confirm) some people are absolutely not fixable, and don’t want to be or can’t be fixed (including addicts, pedophiles, psychopaths, and sociopaths), and some people are absolutely positively evil and irredeemable.

    Christian religious and moral optimism and Aryan(Classical) legal and empirical optimism only say that we must exhaust possibilities because otherwise the epistemic problem is the greater risk, and violates the natural common law, by restoring authority rather than prohibiting authority and preserving jury and juridical decidability.

    Some people need to be subject to sterilization and others to capital punishment. Like many things, the industrial revolution temporarily ‘seduced us’ (or at least enough women voters) into the belief we can afford the costs of incarceration and release, despite the overwhelming evidencde to the contrary. Three strikes was a success. But the reduction in capital punishment has been a failure. And the postwar suppression of eugenics (sterilization at least) has been a worse one. And massive seond and third world immigration has made it worse.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-03 14:34:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665004082774278144

  • THE NATURAL LAW ON SOCIAL DARWINISM Since continuous recursive disambiguation of

    THE NATURAL LAW ON SOCIAL DARWINISM

    Since continuous recursive disambiguation of disorder into order produces evolutionary computation, and evolutionary computation produces competition at scale which in turn produces selection, then there are no phenomena that are not subject to selection pressure by evolutionary computation by continuous recursive disambiguation.

    As such yes, all associative, cooperative, reproductive, productive, norm-producing, commons-producing, polity-producing, national, and civilizational processes are subject to selection pressure: or what we call Darwinian evolution. As such yes, all social processes are Darwinian.

    Yet we have SOME range of control over those Darwinian pressures on individuals in the group, at least within the limit of not impeding our continued evolutionary computation and survival from selection pressures as a group.

    So “Social Darwinism” is true. It’s not ‘discredited, debunked, pseudoscientific, or false’. Instead, it is an undesirable natural process we seek to ameliorate under democratic government now that the industrial revolution has divorced us from subsistence farming for the majority of the population, and given us the opportunity to at least attempt it.

    And democratic governments generally if not always fail for one reason: the limited degree of distortion of natural selection we can tolerate before military, political, economic, social, and reproductive collapse.

    Like the one we are approaching now.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-02 18:14:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664696994659553284

  • RT @StevePender: They’re already at war with us. Always reciprocate

    RT @StevePender: They’re already at war with us. Always reciprocate.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-27 23:01:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662595010787700737

  • DEFINITION: ENSURE VS INSURE IN NATURAL LAW You “ensure” something happens or do

    DEFINITION: ENSURE VS INSURE IN NATURAL LAW
    You “ensure” something happens or doesn’t happen, and you “insure” something against potential damage or loss.
    Ensure = Due Diligence
    Insure = Restitution, Punishment, Prevention
    In NL/P-Law we almost exclusively use the term “insure” because the people as sovereign are the insurers of last resort against a state or government that no longer serves their interests, within the tolerance of their demand for service of their interests.
    So by insuring our sovereignty we ensure our sovereignty.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-27 20:25:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662555617288921090

  • RT @StevePender: @ThruTheHayes A = -(-A) Inability to freely dissociate is force

    RT @StevePender: @ThruTheHayes A = -(-A)

    Inability to freely dissociate is forced association.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-27 00:17:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662251523307446273

  • “People can understand the difference between man’s law and natures Law. Just as

    –“People can understand the difference between man’s law and natures Law. Just as they can understand the difference between criminal law and the laws of physics. Same term but people intuitively get that one is fundamental and the other less so.”– Gabriel

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 20:15:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662190742586966041

  • So yes, they are trying to socially construct a system. of lies that is counter

    So yes, they are trying to socially construct a system. of lies that is counter to the laws of the universe, so that they can justify irresponsibility and externalization of that responsibility to others who will be responsible.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 17:03:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661055256908775432

    Reply addressees: @IAMSEMWTL

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661048521494085638

  • WE KNOW “GODS LAWS” – THERE IS ONLY ONE We know (at least I do, and most of our

    WE KNOW “GODS LAWS” – THERE IS ONLY ONE
    We know (at least I do, and most of our team does) every one of “god’s laws”: the laws of the universe, nature, and man, because there is only one law, and its hierarchy of applications as the complexity of organization of matter inceases: The ternary logic of evolutionary computation by continuous recursive disambiguation of entropy (disorder) into negative entropy (order) by the increase in energy capture, conversion, and density, that releases the pressure in the universe as mass or dissipates pressure into expansion of space. It might not be obvious but there are about two dozen applications of that law producing a set of rules that explain all of existence. But that’s it.

    The question is, can mankind tolerate knowing that he’s responsible and there are no gods or even minds, to parent him. Instead, the universe is a vast irradiated wasteland hostile to life, with rare possibile islands dependent upon a whole sequence of galactic, solar, planetary, lunar, and geological requirements, combined with the vast amount of time it takes evolution to compute each generational incdrease in evolutionary computation.

    The answer is that those who cannot tolerate that knowledge are to be either left behind, or they will drag humanity into the great filter of extinction.

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules @realNachawati

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 06:20:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660893450965774339

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660880817369894915

  • Evidence universally is that reciprocity is morality and immoral, unethical, cri

    Evidence universally is that reciprocity is morality and immoral, unethical, criminal, and evil are just the directness, harm, and intent of the actor. That’s science.

    You just claimed the word of god is the absolute truth but (a) you can’t testify to that fact (b) who can or ever could testify to knowing the word of god or to the existence of god, any god, or gods? (c) there are thousands of christian cults alone with different interpretations of such ‘word of god’, and it varies even amongh the three abrahamic sects (d) and there is a vast difference between monotheistic and polytheistic and natural (ancestral) religions – so what word of god is absolutely true? (e) And no matter which one you state I will rather easily demonstrate that it is either reciprocity or false. (f) and despite millions of people trying for centuries, we cannot find a single case in this world where a supernatural claim is not a scam.

    Reply addressees: @StilettoDave @john45273745 @SaiKate108

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 05:42:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660884008052445185

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660872758857990144

  • Simple terms, rule of law of natural law resulting time preference, high trust a

    Simple terms, rule of law of natural law resulting time preference, high trust and cooperative, economic, and evolutionary velocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 19:22:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660727936876511236

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660723559998603264