Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Q: “CURT: WHAT DOES PROPERTARIANISM IN NATURAL LAW REFER TO?” Propertarianism ev

    Q: “CURT: WHAT DOES PROPERTARIANISM IN NATURAL LAW REFER TO?”

    Propertarianism evolved from the observation that all human behavior, all ethics, morals, politics, and all of social science, could be reduced to statements of changes in the spectrum demonstrated interests (previously, the more narrow “property”), creating the same commensurability in social and behavioral science, as we had observed, in mathematics, physics, and evolutionary science.

    As such propertarianism consists of the methodology by which we can construct a universally commensurable, value neutral, scientific and formal, logic of human cooperation, conflict, and dispute resolution.

    From this logic we can also define the optimum possible ethics, morals, laws, economcis, and political systems, and measure or at least explain, all theories and claims as deviations from that universal optimum.

    … And as such, allows us to recommend innovations to political institutions that are more applicable to the current state of technological development, division of knowledge and labor, and newfound economic independence of man outside of dependence upon nuclear, extended, and tribal family relations of the hunter-gatherer, agrarian, and early industrial organizations of man.

    The Natural Law evolved from Propertarianism, by the unification of the sciences with the P-Method, P-Science of First Principles, P-Logic of causation, and P-Law of universal decidability.

    Our constitution of Natural Law completes the American Constitution of natural law, and reforms the present strategic, political, economic, and social order so that it returns to correspondence to the natural law of universal decidability discovered by p-method, p-logic, p-science, from the discovery of commensurability in Propertarianism.

    Propertarianism sits in the hierarchy of traditional disciplines, as ethics, and we have reformed some of those disciplines as:
    Physics:……………………Physics: evolutionary computation of negative entropy.
    Metaphysics:…………….Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things man (cog. sci.)
    Psychology: ……………..Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends.
    Ethics and Morality:…..Propertarianism. (Reciprocity) The Ethics of Non Imposition, production, and investment.
    Epistemology: ………….Testimonialism. The competition between imaginary associations and existential measurements in all dimensions of actionable reality.
    Law: ………………………..Algorithmic Natural Law. The Natural Law of Reciprocity. Strictly constructed from the test of reciprocity.
    Sociology: ………………..Compatibilism: Intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy wherein we combine information and calculate compatible means to the achievement of different ends through voluntary conflict, competition, cooperation, and boycott.
    Politics: ……………………Markets in Everything. (Which I call “Market Fascism” with tongue in cheek.)
    Strategy:………………… Agency: Maximization of agency through Transcendence, Sovereignty, and Heroism
    Spirituality:………………Transcendence: Masculine Stoicism, Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism,…….Festival Nationalism.

    BTW: I use P-prefix in P-Method, P-Logic P-Science and P-Law for P-completeness, not Propertarianism. This alludes to the computability of the Natural Law Program.

    Cheers,

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-13 19:04:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668695872782172160

  • Q: “CURT, WHAT IS THE NATURAL LAW ON THE RESTITUTION, PUNISHMENT, AND PREVENTION

    Q: “CURT, WHAT IS THE NATURAL LAW ON THE RESTITUTION, PUNISHMENT, AND PREVENTION OF REPETITION FOR THE CRIMES OF THE LEFT?”

    1. How do we demand restitution and punishment for war? It’s easy. Reparations. We’ve done it for millennia.
    2. How do we demand restitution and punishment for treason? It’s easy: execution and seizure of assets of everyone involved.
    3. How do we demand restitution for seditious, treasonous warfare from within? Seizure of Assets and Ostracization: a death sentence by nature itself.

    Well, many of us have lost taste for the Guillotine, despite its use being warranted, but we can follow the ancient law and tradition of ostracization:
    … 1- Seize all Assets, and all Contingent and Consequential Assets for use as reparation in the production of commons.
    … 2- Prohibit speech, ownership, employment, service, exchange, contract, banking and credit.
    … 3- Cancel citizenship, passport, benefits, defense of law enforcement, fire, emergency, and health care, juridical defense, and insurance of life and property.
    … 4- Force migration or repatriation to locations that share their criminal (seditious) interests.

    This is what science, logic, law, morality(cooperation), evolution, and the laws of man and nature demand as restitution, punishment, and prevention of the left: the Second Abrahamic destruction of civilization.

    That’s the Judgment of the Natural Law: the science of cooperation and the resolution of conflict produced by crimes, especially crimes of sedition, treason, invasion, conversion, and war.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-13 17:40:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668674830445469699

  • Q: “CURT, WHAT IS THE NATURAL LAW ON THE RESTITUTION, PUNISHMENT, AND PREVENTION

    Q: “CURT, WHAT IS THE NATURAL LAW ON THE RESTITUTION, PUNISHMENT, AND PREVENTION OF REPETITION FOR THE CRIMES OF THE LEFT?”

    1. How do we demand restitution and punishment for war? It’s easy. Reparations. We’ve done it for millennia.
    2. How do we demand restitution and punishment for treason? It’s easy: execution and seizure of assets of everyone involved.
    3. How do we demand restitution for seditious, treasonous warfare from within? Seizure of Assets and Ostracization: a death sentence by nature itself.

    Well, many of us have lost taste for the Guillotine, despite its use being warranted, but we can follow the ancient law and tradition of ostracization:
    … 1- Seize all Assets, and all Contingent and Consequential Assets for use as reparation in the production of commons.
    … 2- Prohibit speech, ownership, employment, service, exchange, contract, banking and credit.
    … 3- Cancel citizenship, passport, benefits, defense of law enforcement, fire, emergency, and health care, juridical defense, and insurance of life and property.
    … 4- Force migration or repatriation to locations that share their criminal (seditious) interests.

    This is what science, logic, law, morality(cooperation), evolution, and the laws of man and nature demand as restitution, punishment, and prevention of the left: the Second Abrahamic destruction of civilization.

    That’s the Judgment of the Natural Law: the science of cooperation and the resolution of conflict produced by crimes, especially crimes of sedition, treason, invasion, conversion, and war.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-13 17:40:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668674584512438283

  • Natural Law Lesson Of The Day: Natural Law of Self Determination of each and all

    Natural Law Lesson Of The Day:
    Natural Law of Self Determination
    of each and all of the people
    insuring one another by Force of Arms,
    in Sovereignty in demonstrated interests
    and Reciprocity in Display Word and Deed
    Requiring Commonality in Dispute Resolution
    Requiring Concurrency in Contracts of the Commons
    Requiring Trifunctionality in institutions
    Of Care(religion), Decision(Law), and Order(state).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-10 20:06:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667624367272910848

  • Freedom of speech and action (Display, Word, and Deed) does not include freedom

    Freedom of speech and action (Display, Word, and Deed) does not include freedom of lying, deception, fraud, conspiracy, social construction, propagandizing, conversion, sedition, or treason. And those tests are objective: he’s justified, advocated for, lied, deceived, socially constructed, and propagandized the use of violence to deprive of self-determination, conquer, rule, culturecide, and genocide a fellow European people. You absolutely have the freedom to be wrong. You do not have the freedom to engage in crime. He is both wrong, and engaged in a crime – a conspiracy to conquer, rule, culturecide, and genocide a people. It’s not an opinion. It’s a fact. (RE Coach Red Pill: Gonzalo Lira)

    Reply addressees: @Camry4sale


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-10 13:41:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667527334864338944

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667524195192918017

  • Try to ignore them and pay the price of doing so. Gravity is simple. Reciprocity

    Try to ignore them and pay the price of doing so.
    Gravity is simple.
    Reciprocity is only slightly more complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-07 17:42:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666500857024618514

    Reply addressees: @nemo81886205

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666498114214060074

  • The Natural Law Program: The Terms P-Method, P-Logic, P-Law distinguish our work

    The Natural Law Program:

    The Terms P-Method, P-Logic, P-Law distinguish our work from the current terminology for the scientific method, set logic, and arbitrary law. We use the P-prefix to indicate we’re using ‘unambiguous, universally commensurable, value neutral, first princples science and constructive logic of decidabilty’.

    The Program Consists of:
    The Method
    The First Principles
    The Grammars (including Lying)
    The Demonstrated Interests
    Reciprocity
    Testimonial Truth
    Decidability
    The Natural Law
    The Constitution of Natural Law (perfect government)
    The Reforms
    The Restitutions and Punishments

    The Volumes (Books)
    History
    Philosophy
    Science
    Law
    Reforms
    The Prosecution
    The Law of Europeans
    The Natural Religion

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @costelloe_w


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-06 14:43:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666093434791415821

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666090849162387457

  • “Q: WHY IS P-LAW SO HARD TO LEARN?” –“The reason [P-Law] requires so much time

    “Q: WHY IS P-LAW SO HARD TO LEARN?”

    –“The reason [P-Law] requires so much time to fully understand is because of the requirement to train the brain to think in a particular way. You’ve got to train it to produce the cognitive infrastructure by engaging certain thinking patterns to ultimately produce truth and reduce errors. Understanding these definitions of concepts and relations is a way to get there. It’s like training your muscles.”– DEK.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-06 14:23:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666088538507722753

  • (Thread by someone new I haven’t heard from before.) An excellent example of beg

    (Thread by someone new I haven’t heard from before.)
    An excellent example of beginning work using P-Law. You can do it. It’s not easy. It’s work. But you start with these arguments, and you’ll eventually be capable of writing operational equations. They will look like very… https://twitter.com/Zatarabii/status/1665048538324037633


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-03 17:35:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665049507879428096

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle @aldafa_ir THE NATURAL LAW INSTITUTE

    RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle @aldafa_ir THE NATURAL LAW INSTITUTE https://t.co/6FYbg4z4JL


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-03 17:06:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665042385586233344