Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Cooperación

    Cuando comienzas por el hecho de presumir que la cooperación es obligatoria, en vez de pensar que la cooperación es meramente optativa entre: depredación, cooperación y boicot. Puedes justificar al pragmatismo, las (((construcciones sociales))) y las religiones de todos los tipos. Cuando partes de la verdad: De que tenemos la opción de que la violencia en todo momento y que la violencia siempre es preferible en todo momento, no puedes justificar al pragmatismo, la (((construcción social))) y las religiones de todo tipo.   Es por ello que las mentiras filosóficas y las mentiras Abrahámicas son tan exitosas: Por el mero hecho de que estamos intentando cooperar, pensamos que hemos puesto de lado a la violencia, y esto hace que pensemos que es “descortés” referirnos a esa opción como una alternativa viable. Pero para el hombre para el cual la cooperación ya no es preferible, no se hacen presuposiciones, y no ha puesto de lado a la violencia como una opción, sino que busca negociar los términos bajo los cuales cooperar “podría” ser preferible al conflicto, conquista o depredación. Con ley natural no hay presuposiciones.

  • Cooperación

    Cuando comienzas por el hecho de presumir que la cooperación es obligatoria, en vez de pensar que la cooperación es meramente optativa entre: depredación, cooperación y boicot. Puedes justificar al pragmatismo, las (((construcciones sociales))) y las religiones de todos los tipos. Cuando partes de la verdad: De que tenemos la opción de que la violencia en todo momento y que la violencia siempre es preferible en todo momento, no puedes justificar al pragmatismo, la (((construcción social))) y las religiones de todo tipo.   Es por ello que las mentiras filosóficas y las mentiras Abrahámicas son tan exitosas: Por el mero hecho de que estamos intentando cooperar, pensamos que hemos puesto de lado a la violencia, y esto hace que pensemos que es “descortés” referirnos a esa opción como una alternativa viable. Pero para el hombre para el cual la cooperación ya no es preferible, no se hacen presuposiciones, y no ha puesto de lado a la violencia como una opción, sino que busca negociar los términos bajo los cuales cooperar “podría” ser preferible al conflicto, conquista o depredación. Con ley natural no hay presuposiciones.

  • “…in reference to testimonialism, the (full) accounting of reciprocity (moral,

    —“…in reference to testimonialism, the (full) accounting of reciprocity (moral, symmetrical exchange) is a subset (special application) of the more broad category of full accounting, which subsumes more traditional epistemic concerns (warranty against cherry picking , due diligence against contradicting facts of a particular domain, etc).

    The genius of propertarianism is that it bridges the gap between morality and ‘science’ (truth telling), so that we can practice complete scientific realism is matters of ethics, law, commons & market.”— James Augustus

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-16 15:40:00 UTC

  • “The One Law of Cooperation is Reciprocity and Property is its Measure.”

    “The One Law of Cooperation is Reciprocity and Property is its Measure.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-16 09:28:00 UTC

  • When you start from the presumption that cooperation is mandatory rather than co

    When you start from the presumption that cooperation is mandatory rather than cooperation is merely one choice among three: predation, cooperation, boycott – you can justify pragmatism, social construction, and religions of all stripes.

    When you start from the truth: that we have the option for violence at all times, and that at all times violence might be preferable, you cannot justify pragmatism, social construction, and religions of all stripes.

    This is why the philosophical lies and the abrahamic lies are so successful: by the mere fact that we are attempting to cooperate we have already forgone violence, and it is ‘rude’ to refer to that extra-discourse option. But to the man for whom cooperation is no longer preferable, he makes not presupposition, and has not forgone violence, but seeks to negotiate terms under which cooperating ‘might’ still be preferable to conflict, conquest, and predation.

    Natural Law: no presumptions whatsoever.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-13 05:53:00 UTC

  • THERE IS ONLY ONE MORAL AND JUST GOVERNMENT There is but one moral course of gov

    THERE IS ONLY ONE MORAL AND JUST GOVERNMENT

    There is but one moral course of government, and that is the construction, operation, and preservation, of a condition of Natural Law, by Rule of Law, under Universal Suffrage of Natural Law, whose application is discovered by the Common Law by Judges, under the requirement that all words and deeds be limited to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers of Property-in-Toto, free of imposition of costs by externality against the Property-in-Toto of others.

    All else consists of the predatory farming of man for the benefit of others.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 15:29:00 UTC

  • THE FOUNDERS WERE USING CURRENT TECHNOLOGY TO DESCRIBE NATURAL LAW Natural Law,

    THE FOUNDERS WERE USING CURRENT TECHNOLOGY TO DESCRIBE NATURAL LAW

    Natural Law, Locke, Smith, and Hume were understood by Jefferson as the most current technology available. But that he, and they, were still victims of the poetry of scripture and wrote their laws in that verse. So they used *higher context* and less precise language and I’m using *lower context* and more precise language, in order to prevent ‘interpretation’ (abuse) of natural law through the act of misrepresenting terms written in high context as permissive, and therefore eliminating possibility of abuse through ‘interpretation’.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 10:29:00 UTC

  • ON RELIGION: SOCIAL RELIGION VS POLITICAL LAW Your religion does not matter unde

    ON RELIGION: SOCIAL RELIGION VS POLITICAL LAW

    Your religion does not matter under strictly constructed Natural Law. Because under natural law you cannot speak, publish, or act in discord with natural law. And as such those aspects of any religion that are in violation of Natural Law cannot be spoken of, published, or acted upon. As such all religions must adapt to Natural Law by eliminating those propositions that violate Natural Law – whether you like, dislike, rationalize or fail to, those propositions. As such we do not need to construct a religion, and can allow religions to evolve such that they are no longer immoral by violation of Natural Law. And religions will retain their spiritual and social value while abandoning their political utility, by reverting to wisdom literature, rituals, and celebrations.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 09:22:00 UTC

  • DISCOVERY VS COMPOSITION There is a great difference between COMPOSED literature

    DISCOVERY VS COMPOSITION

    There is a great difference between COMPOSED literature, and DISCOVERED law. Wisdom literature whether religion or philosophical is composed. Natural Law is empirical – we discover it. We discover existential truth and compose fiction and lies.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 07:37:00 UTC

  • WE ARE UNEQUAL, BUT WHAT WILL YOU TRADE? We are dramatically unequal in every po

    WE ARE UNEQUAL, BUT WHAT WILL YOU TRADE?

    We are dramatically unequal in every possible way, other than reciprocity. Natural Law produces the only equality possible: equality of reciprocity in matters of conflict, leaving us markets for reciprocity in all walks of life, independent of our abilities. Yes some of us are more genetically fortuitous than others, like every other species, and some of us less, like every other species. But the only way we can work together is reciprocity, and reciprocity produces evolutionary excellence. SO, the question is, what will you trade?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 15:01:00 UTC