RECIPROCITY?
A double standard is by definition a violation of reciprocity. A double standard then is a deceit. A fraud. A fraud which we may punish.
Since one may take no action for which one may not perform restitution if one errs, the only restitution for a double standard in matters of political scale, leave only your death as a means of restitution.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-23 09:06:00 UTC
WHAT IS DOOLITTLE SAYING?
That after we destroy all those precious fantasies that we hold onto, the only ‘good’ is reciprocity, and the result of reciprocity is eugenics, prosperity, and transcendence. And a government of perfect reciprocity is possible to construct under strictly constructed, natural law. Everything else I say is to deprive you of the illusion that there are alternatives.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 17:50:00 UTC
PEOPLE *WILL* TAKE NATURAL LAW IN EXCHANGE
Ran my work on ending financialism through the “Mom Test” today with excellent results. (Spent her career in customer service, banking, teaching, and counseling.)
Response? Well, horror at understanding how our people have been preyed upon. Thrilled at the consequences of that reform. Amazed at the solutions provided. But “omg… you cannot explain this kind of thing to the average american. they’re too stupid….”
Which is why we can only do it under natural law, and defense of the informational commons, so that we can punish, imprison, or kill anyone who attempts to use propaganda to stop it.
You see, we must adhere to natural law, and offer something substantial to the people in exchange for imposing a new constitution of natural law
What I’m offering is the banking and financial sector and their political dependents on pyre in exchange for rescue from financial servitude.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 16:06:00 UTC
Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy are not composed. We merely deny people parasitism in all actions and only Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy remain.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 15:00:00 UTC
If women don’t interfere in the affairs of men, then must grant them safety in exchange, and attempt at all times to save them from fear. If women interfere in the affairs of men, then we must only treat them as men. Which they universally object to, by using all forms of name calling. That is the source of feminist argument.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 10:37:00 UTC
Yeah. Your ancestors were serfs.
Thats why you’re a serf today.
You know how you exit serfdom?
Violence. Natural Law. A Craft.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 12:35:00 UTC
Men are innately rational. Men are not innately amoral, moral, immoral, or evil. Our task, as individuals, families, and polities, is to remove the opportunities for the unethical, immoral, and evil, leaving only amoral and moral actions available to each other.
—-
(FYI: Amoral (/AYH-more-uhl/) Adj. – Neither moral nor immoral: independent of moral consequence.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 10:52:00 UTC
MEN ARE RATIONAL – PERIOD.
1 – Men are rational. Period.
2 – Men can rationally choose morality or immorality or evil. Period.
3 – Morality consist of reciprocity. Period.
4 – Reciprocity consists of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality – period.
5 – The test of reciprocity is changes in property in toto (demonstrated property) Period.
6 – The purpose of reciprocity is the demand for restitution as a means of preventing retaliation cycles.
7 – The Purpose of preventing retaliation cycles, is to preserve the value of cooperation.
8 – The incremental suppression of retaliation cycles produces lower risk and higher experimental velocity, (that we call ‘trust’), thereby increasing the rate of returns on cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 10:23:00 UTC
ARE MEN NOT MORAL?
—“If men are not moral, why do they have any conception of good, let alone try to achieve it?”—Keith Smith
Men are merely rational. We are capable of moral (cooperative) and immoral (parasitic), and evil (predatory) behaviors. We demonstrate that we are capable of moral, immoral, and evil behaviors.
We choose good most often because it is rational. A few of us choose not good because it is rational – fairly often. A few of us choose evil, because it is rational given their emotional condition. We always manage our physical, emotional, and intellectual(frustration) budgets, and we
We educate our young and each other in order to preserve the utility of cooperation for them, for ourselves, and the group, and to prevent retaliation for them, ourselves, and the group.
The fact of the matter is that if you are strong, in the short term predation is most rewarding, at the cost of future retaliation. if you are not weak, In the medium term cooperation is most rewarding. In the long term, if you are weak, parasitism is most rewarding.
And this is what we see: a predatory upper class, a productive middle class, and a parasitic underclass.
There are no possible perpetual motion machines, including those of a polity, economy, and kin group.
We must always defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity, despite that some of us are strong and competent, some of us not weak but competent, and some of us weak and incompetent.
We are, like all nature, bound by the basic laws of the universe, and in particular, the laws of thermodynamics. All civilization is merely an attempt to cooperate at larger and larger scales, by trading off near pleasures, for future returns.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 10:06:00 UTC
THE BEST AND MOST IMPORTANT 200 WORDS YOU CAN READ TODAY:
All men are rational actors – neither moral nor immoral, but rational. We achieve the good by eliminating the utility of choosing the bad. We eliminate the utility of choosing the bad by the promise of violence for violations of reciprocity. We test for the violation of reciprocity by demand for fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary transfer free of negative externality. We call this test of reciprocity Natural Law. We can only test this Natural Law by the use of independent judges and juries to discover violations of it by sympathetic testing. We can perform that sympathetic testing when observing testimony. We can sympathetically test from testimony because our ability cooperate was made possible by an ability to sympathize with intent. By sympathizing with intent, we can discover malincentives and malintentions. We can then judge malincentives and malintentions, and record those judgements for future use in what we call the ‘common law.’. But for this system to work at all, those who testify, the jury, and the judges must give higher priority to the commons than to their self, kin, or organizational interests. And so they themselves must be subject to the same demand for reciprocity as those that they adjudicate. This is the secret to western civilization: truthfulness of warrior cult spread across all men, via service in militia and army.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 09:05:00 UTC