Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • “Where did the Non-Aggression Principle originate? Who was the first philosopher

    —“Where did the Non-Aggression Principle originate? Who was the first philosopher to posit this axiom?”—

    by Rik Storey

    It was a deliberately and impractically broad term to refer to the loose ethics of classical liberals and also to the legal terminology used by many libertarians. It easily adopted an abstract and pseudo religious quality and is now the scourge of sensible people on the right the world over.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-28 08:12:00 UTC

  • “People avoid responsibility while demanding liberty, failing to see that respon

    —“People avoid responsibility while demanding liberty, failing to see that responsibility naturally leads to liberty, total responsibility leads to sovereignty.”— Bill Joslin


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-27 12:32:00 UTC

  • Well, that’s just it, isn’t it? 1 – The individual only needs to understand his

    Well, that’s just it, isn’t it?

    1 – The individual only needs to understand his choice is preferable.(person)

    2 – Those cooperating only need to understand their choices are good.(group)

    3 – Those deciding conflicts only need to understand whether the conflict is decidable. (judge)

    Now people conflate the possible, the preferable, the good, and the true, as if they’re synonyms, without considering the implied grammar.

    A preference isn’t true. It’s just a preference and possible or not.

    A good isn’t true, it’s just preferable, and good, and possible or not.

    A truth isn’t preferable or good, it’s just true.

    Yet another example of the problem of conflation rather than operational grammar and definitions.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-25 15:00:00 UTC

  • You know, there are debates I can win, that I do not wish to win. That said, out

    You know, there are debates I can win, that I do not wish to win. That said, out of moral obligation to the commons I must win them. But I would prefer I was never challenged to win them. No man wishes to police his fellows. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-25 06:20:00 UTC

  • “The expansion of the definition of property (physical property) to property-in-

    —“The expansion of the definition of property (physical property) to property-in-toto (that which others have born costs to obtain an interest without imposing costs upon the interests of others) makes it increasingly easier to demonstrate to libertarians and the like the State’s role in the redistribution of property via voting rights advocated by 1st wave feminism. It hits their anti-socialist/communist preference which makes it really effective.”—Chris Moyer


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 13:42:00 UTC

  • THE REASON WE WANT NATURAL LAW AND INVOLUNTARY WARRANTY OF PUBLIC SPEECH : IT”S

    THE REASON WE WANT NATURAL LAW AND INVOLUNTARY WARRANTY OF PUBLIC SPEECH : IT”S JUST HARD TO BE WRONG.

    (from elsewhere)

    Now let me say something that sounds far more profoundly arrogant that it is:

    I make a lot of mistakes of knowledge, but very few mistakes of understanding.This is because using method I’ve developed (acquisitionism, testimonialism and propertarianism) makes it almost impossible to fail to understand and test human speech (argument).

    Which is precisely why natural law needs to be implemented, and that includes an involuntary warranty of due diligence extended from actions, products, and services, to all political speech.

    Because we can. And if we do, the consequences will be as profound as the development of aristotelian reason and baconian empiricism.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 10:16:00 UTC

  • Let me try this again: Not Capitalism vs Socialism but Economics vs Natural Law

    Let me try this again: Not Capitalism vs Socialism but Economics vs Natural Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 13:26:00 UTC

  • MARXIST AND CAPITALIST ERRORS (THE UNDERLYING ISSUE IS NATURAL LAW NOT ECONOMICS

    MARXIST AND CAPITALIST ERRORS (THE UNDERLYING ISSUE IS NATURAL LAW NOT ECONOMICS)

    Better if I list the ‘set’ of the most significant marxist errors.

    1) Labor Theory of Value vs Subjective theory of value

    2) Value of voluntarily organizing labor, vs value of labor in production

    3) Value of risk of extant capital vs value of risk of opportunity

    4) Prices and calculation without money and prices.

    5) Knowledge and Incentives with and without private property

    6) Oppression by Discretion vs Domestication by Market Means.

    7) Demonstrable superior benefit to working classes (reduced prices and increased consumption) than to middle and upper classes (capital increases).

    8) Tendencies of bureaucracies to maximize rents vs Tendencies of bureaucracies to dissipate.

    9) Greater susceptibilities of bureaucracies to corruption than markets.

    10) Demonstrated failure of all attempts at socialism and empirical evidence that the underlying causal problem is iq and trust (genetics).

    I mean, that’s JUST THE BEGINNING.

    Here is some of what’s wrong with capitalism.

    1) There are no unlimited ‘goods’, at some point one is destroying capital rather than decreasing prices. And most capitalist theory assumes endless goods – particularly consumption, just as most marxist theory assumes endless goods – particularly of human beings (a very expensive and toxic life form.)

    2) The assumption that all can survive in a competitive market when all cannot if for no other reason than every half standard deviation in IQ roughly doubles the cost of training and limits the possible scope of work, meaning that many people are increasingly dead weights on society no matter how moral their intentions.

    3) The assumption of the superiority of cities whereas it is fairly obvious that cities are IQ and ovary sinks that cause continuous damage to the gene pool (yeah, that one surprised me). The better method would have been to encourage people to return to the farm and live tax free, agrarian lives, and to increase taxes in the cities since all profitability is a function of density.

    4) The state is a horrible method of defense against abuse of markets, and bureaucracies and politicians exacerbate the problem by making privileges and rents available. For a market to function the people must have universal standing in court against companies for violations of common capital by externality, not just fraud, monetary coercion, and violence against people.

    5) The current keynesian economic models do not measure changes in the full set of capital, only largely changes in velocity of consumption. This means we are destroying genetic and cultural and institutional capital in exchange for short term consumption and downward redistribution of reproduction.

    6) We do not regulate the size of the population pool, especially the underclass, and actively immigrate underclasses reversing 4000 years of european evolution.

    7) A polity must produce sufficiently valuable market goods in order to organize a voluntary organization of production (capitalism). the problem is that the external market not the polity determines the minimum demand for goods, services, and information. As such, it is almost impossible for all but northern european and east asian economies to make use of democracy and capitalism, and socialism will always fail them, so they are all doomed unless they repair the size of their underclasses.

    That’s just a beginning. If I sit here and write about ‘evangelical capitalism’ all afternoon I’ll want to go shoot myself…..

    -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 12:45:00 UTC

  • London school: statistical management of estates scaled too fast to be governed

    London school: statistical management of estates scaled too fast to be governed by natural law.– Josh Jeppson


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 11:27:00 UTC

  • There is no ‘must’ or ‘may’ for the Sovereign man. Only ‘can’ and ‘choice’

    There is no ‘must’ or ‘may’ for the Sovereign man. Only ‘can’ and ‘choice’.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-20 12:02:00 UTC