Let me restate that in simple terms:
–“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of doing so.”–
Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716158354345648625
Let me restate that in simple terms:
–“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of doing so.”–
Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?
You know the answer.
It’s not multiculturalism you see.
It’s just looting and pillaging really.
And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.
How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.
Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:23:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716158354219798528
(NLI Update)
This morning Brad and I wrote the introduction to the summary of The Laws – what we internally call ‘The Pamphlet’ – which just lists the ternary logic and laws four all four of the sciences from physics to group evolutionary strategies.
We had originally included a section in The Science volume called ‘the synthesis’ – which would hold this overview. But both our followers and brad in particular felt we needed to publish something sooner that was enough of an overview that our people could begin to evangalize with -and which would establish our academic credibility.
As for the content, Brad has been consistent in keeping the negativas out of it, especially the conflict of civilizations we’re currently embroilded in at the same time as the conflict of the sexes – which is a double whammy for us.
At present I’m not sure where we’ll put the European vs Semitic vs Asian conflict section – whether in the Science volume or possibly the Persecutions volume. The sex differences in conflict and lying is in the Science volume. And I suspect that’s the best place to put it.
I’m not quite settled on this. Because most people, at least the conservatives, want and need the science of the feminine-semitic devolutionary vs masculine european evolutionary content most of all because it’s the cause of the crisis of our age.
Because the semitic and underclass instinct whether in rome and christianity, or in marxism and class warfare (again), and semitic and feminine warfare (again) in the present age are always the problem in every era destroying each civlization it touches.
Any deep and considered thoughts would be appreciated.
Remember we’re thnking of moving markets (factions) not just what you want. But what our people need to achieve a desired end.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 17:58:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716151969348263936
I do the truth from the science. What we do about the truth is a choice. The best use of that choice is to discover a means of cooperating truthfully. If we lie about the truth we prevent ourselves from discovering a means of cooperating truthfully. If this is unbearable for you…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 19:50:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714730623007428668
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714729812713935093
https://naturallawinstitute.com/docs/
Look at this. It’s waht we ‘re building.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:18:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714420653095333936
Reply addressees: @keetonbrewster @NatLawInstitute
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714416160870129912
Q:Does doolittle distinguish between morality and reciprocity?
ChatGPT
In Curt Doolittle’s framework, morality and reciprocity are interrelated concepts, but they are not identical. Doolittle posits that the core of morality lies in reciprocity, but reciprocity is a specific criterion that can be objectively measured and tested, while morality may encompass a broader set of norms, beliefs, and values that a community holds.
Reciprocity
In Doolittle’s work, reciprocity is defined with a rather rigorous set of criteria. It serves as a foundational concept for a system of ethics and law grounded in Natural Law. Reciprocity involves the voluntary transfer of goods, services, or information where both parties benefit and neither is left in a state of harm or loss.
Morality
Morality, in Doolittle’s framework, refers to the complex of norms, values, and practices that a community adopts, which often includes but is not limited to principles of reciprocity. Moral codes can be informed by traditions, religious beliefs, and other social factors, making them subject to interpretation and variation across different cultures.
In essence, while all acts of reciprocity could be considered moral under this framework, not all moral acts are necessarily rooted in reciprocity. Some moral actions may be unilateral and involve a cost born by one party for the benefit of another, without immediate or apparent reciprocation.
Thus, reciprocity serves as a subset of morality, one that can be rigorously defined and universally applied. It offers a way to make ethical and legal judgments that are objective and decidable, making it particularly useful in legal contexts.
CD Comment: Close but not quite right… We can always determine if a moral norm or tradition is indeed reciprocal within the context of the group strategy AND across group strategies. And what is moral within a group strategy may not be moral across group strategies. As such the natural law (universal) is reciprocity, but the conditions for reciprocity may differ within group vs across groups, and the across group definition is the higher priority when considering reciprocity across groups.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 14:52:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713930951992963072
The problem is that this fails when we’re marginally indifferent. So the better rule is “as they wish to be”. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-15 21:46:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713672728601940044
Reply addressees: @StephenThomasHC
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713671603446259998
October 7th NLI Office Hours Q&A Answers:
1 (important) question answered
0:00 tech check (skip to 5:12)
2:10 Q1: need further clarification, not answered (Skip)
5:12 Q2: on South American’s role in geopolitics
20:00 American geopolitical strategy: altruistic vs imperialistic
27:25 The root of the problem
45:18 Function of the woman’s house of congress, understanding concurrent democracy
All questions and answers in this session archived at https://t.co/hzVn7NfpFX
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 19:26:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713275123585728512
OCT 14th NLI OFFICE HOURS Q&A LIVESTREAM
(you should watch it.)
3 questions answered:
(0:00 tech check, skip to 2:05.)
1) 2:05 Q1: destruction of old fashioned concepts like Honor, Duty, and Excellence
2) 22:45 Q2: reciprocity of expats living abroad, and geopolitical implications of free trade and labor arbitrage
3) 49:55 Q3: intentional and unconscious attack by Marxist, feminine ideology
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 19:26:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713275112143585280
TODAY’S NLI OFFICE HOURS LIVESTREAM
(you should watch it.)
3 questions answered:
(0:00 tech check, skip to 2:05.)
1) 2:05 Q1: destruction of old fashioned concepts like Honor, Duty, and Excellence
2) 22:45 Q2: reciprocity of expats living abroad, and geopolitical implications of free trade and labor arbitrage
3) 49:55 Q3: intentional and unconscious attack by Marxist, feminine ideology
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 19:26:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713272571926286340