Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • RT @NatLawInstitute: @BOB37702515 @curtdoolittle Natural law, like all laws of n

    RT @NatLawInstitute: @BOB37702515 @curtdoolittle Natural law, like all laws of nature, simply describes causality, in this case of human be…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 18:53:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717253011326525587

  • PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture” (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v. (the generalizati

    PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture”
    (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v.
    (the generalization of homesteading)

    (re: contra kinsella 2)
    Kinsella uses the libertarian term “original appropriation” which says nothing other than an action that one seeks to bring a thing under his control and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 01:36:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716992123457745222

  • PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture” (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v. (the generalizati

    PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture”
    (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v.
    (the generalization of homesteading)

    (re: contra kinsella 2)
    Kinsella uses the libertarian term “original appropriation” which says nothing other than an action that one seeks to bring a thing under his control and out of the control of others”.

    We use the word homesteading which is more appropriate (sic) because it means you’ve invested in an thing over time that was not previously invested in by others.

    Homesteading is the better term – but this might be one of those rare time we need a neologism. 😉

    We need a term that is the equivalent of homesteading that more generalzed and consists of the operational terms by which we bring our control over something into legitimacy by the costs born without impacting the costs born by others. We need to be creative about defining a new term.

    Primovestiture: From “primo” (first) and “investment.”

    Elements of Primovestiture
    Initial Investment: The human action of allocating resources—whether it’s labor, capital, or intellectual effort—to something previously unclaimed or undeveloped.

    Exclusivity: Ensuring that the actor is the first to make the said investment, effectively nullifying the possibility of dual claims over the resource.

    Non-Deprivation: The investment does not produce externalities that would impose costs on others, maintaining a state of Pareto efficiency.

    Utility in Decidability
    Primovestiture offers a criterion for the decidability in disputes over initial claims by providing an axiomatic foundation based on natural law. If an action satisfies the principles of Primovestiture, then it has achieved a state of ethical legitimacy and should be universally preferable within a given legal system. It also dovetails with performative truth, as the action itself, when conducted under the constraints of Primovestiture, reveals a truth about the legitimacy of ownership.

    Cross-disciplinary Application
    Given your focus on unifying multiple fields under the banner of Natural Law, Primovestiture can serve as

    The concept fills a notable gap in the lexicon of property theory and resource allocation. It essentially entails a generalized form of “homesteading” that extends beyond land and natural resources to include anything that can be controlled or influenced by human action. The focus is on the ethical or legitimate acquisition through initial investment, without creating external costs for others.

    Steps to coining a new term:

    1. Identify Key Components of the Concept
    Initial Investment: You are the first to allocate resources—be it time, effort, or material goods.
    Exclusivity: No one else has previously invested in the object or concept.
    Non-Deprivation: Your investment does not deprive or cost others.

    2. Consult Existing Terminology
    Terms like “usufruct,” “first appropriation,” and “stakeholding” might provide inspiration but aren’t adequate to capture your concept entirely.

    3. Experiment with Word Creation
    Primovestiture: From “primo” (first) and “investment.”

    4. Assess the Term for Clarity and Applicability
    The term should be self-explanatory to some degree.
    It should be broad enough to apply to various contexts, from natural resources to intellectual property to social and economic capital.

    5. Introduce the Term in Academic and Professional Circles
    A white paper or academic article that outlines the theoretical framework can serve as an introduction.

    I don’t think much of academia but this might be one of those cases where it’s useful.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 01:36:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716992123151499264

  • MIGHT, RIGHT, AND RIGHTS (re: counter kinsella) Might does, always and everywher

    MIGHT, RIGHT, AND RIGHTS
    (re: counter kinsella)
    Might does, always and everywhere make RIGHTS – as in the right to appeal to an insurer for the enforcement of a contractual right, constitutional right, or natural right under natural law.
    Whether might makes right – as in right or wrong, moral or immoral – or not is a question of whether might is involved but whether the actions and consequences are right or wrong, moral or immoral.
    In this sense, might can make right or not, and is required to make rights, obligations, and inalienations: all of them.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 23:01:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716953200266293248

  • Our organization seeks to solve the problems of conflict in modernity. To blame

    Our organization seeks to solve the problems of conflict in modernity. To blame each other for our past transgressions is not as useful as determining what behaviors and laws will prevent repetition of those transgressions as well as those of the present and future.

    My work has helped me understand just how old our group evolutionary strategies are, and how unconscious we are of them.

    And worse, that some are more moral and others less moral and worse.

    The challenge is that the median of the distribution determines the maximum trust a polity can commit to given that trustworthiness and trust are dependent upon predictive capacity of the individual, and the noms that predictive ability demands given the cognitive and knowledge capacity of the people.

    In other words not all people are fit for a high trust society. And not all cultures are capable of demanding high trust behavior. And only the japan se and the germanics can extend that trust to the commons.

    So few populations on earth are capable of integration into Japanese or Germanic civ. and we are seeing the gradual consequences of the pretense such a thing is possible.

    Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @JP03880617 @GadSaad


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 19:21:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716897743560413184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716889170063614422

  • “Predators and parasites despise morality because it attempts to nullify their b

    –“Predators and parasites despise morality because it attempts to nullify their biological strategy. The human species can’t continue tolerating destroyers though and still build sophisticated but fragile things. … It is much easier to destroy than to create.”— Terry… https://twitter.com/mentorstrophy/status/1716604475236929793


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 01:49:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716633049679495629

  • “Natural law isn’t a cheat code; it’s the play code.”– Brandon Hayes

    –“Natural law isn’t a cheat code; it’s the play code.”– Brandon Hayes. https://twitter.com/ThruTheHayes/status/1716600132643278951

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of it.”– Paraphrase of Dr Brad.

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716172919561224192

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of it.”–

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716159194401742848

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of paying for it.”–

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716159056908349440