Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Power Exists, Not Rights. Rights Must Be Exchanged And Enforced With Power.

    THERE EXIST NO RIGHTS Rights do not exist between peoples. Power exists. Rights are exchanged between kin for the purpose of cooperation in the pursuit of wealth and power. Everything else is just religious wishful thinking – the kind of thinking that makes people poor.

  • Power Exists, Not Rights. Rights Must Be Exchanged And Enforced With Power.

    THERE EXIST NO RIGHTS Rights do not exist between peoples. Power exists. Rights are exchanged between kin for the purpose of cooperation in the pursuit of wealth and power. Everything else is just religious wishful thinking – the kind of thinking that makes people poor.

  • There is Only One Natural Law

    There is only one natural law, and that is reciprocity. That law is empirically evolving at all times in that branch of law we call tort. That tort law evolves by incremental suppression of parasitism by new discoveries of ir-reciprocity that violate the one law of reciprocity. The principle problem in tort history is the failure to define property as property-in-toto, and this problem has been caused by the Ruler’s interest in preventing defectors as well as defeaters, while at the same time collecting fees for doing so. Like regulating an economy via money supply, we have a very hard time finding a measurement that provides us with decidability that produces no even worse externalities. The answer in both cases is markets, rule of law, and universal standing in matters of the commons, such that the governor is not necessary as other than a judge of last resort. The west invented rule without government for the same reason we invented law without discretion: the consequence of a voluntary militia of equal sovereigns is the only decidability that is possible is tort (reciprocity).

  • There is Only One Natural Law

    There is only one natural law, and that is reciprocity. That law is empirically evolving at all times in that branch of law we call tort. That tort law evolves by incremental suppression of parasitism by new discoveries of ir-reciprocity that violate the one law of reciprocity. The principle problem in tort history is the failure to define property as property-in-toto, and this problem has been caused by the Ruler’s interest in preventing defectors as well as defeaters, while at the same time collecting fees for doing so. Like regulating an economy via money supply, we have a very hard time finding a measurement that provides us with decidability that produces no even worse externalities. The answer in both cases is markets, rule of law, and universal standing in matters of the commons, such that the governor is not necessary as other than a judge of last resort. The west invented rule without government for the same reason we invented law without discretion: the consequence of a voluntary militia of equal sovereigns is the only decidability that is possible is tort (reciprocity).

  • There is only one natural law, and that is reciprocity. That law is empirically

    There is only one natural law, and that is reciprocity. That law is empirically evolving at all times in that branch of law we call tort. That tort law evolves by incremental suppression of parasitism by new discoveries of irreciprocity that violate the one law of reciprocity. The principle problem in tort history is the failure to define property as property-in-toto, and this problem has been caused by the Ruler’s interest in preventing defectors as well as defeaters, while at the same time collecting fees for doing so. Like regulating an economy via money supply, we have a very hard time finding a measurement that provides us with decidabilty that produces no even worse externalities. The answer in both cases is markets, rule of law, and universal standing in matters of the commons, such that the governor is not necessary as other than a judge of last resort. The west invented rule without government for the same reason we invented law without discretion: the consequence of a voluntary militia of equal sovereigns is the only decidability that is possible is tort (reciprocity).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:10:00 UTC

  • (FYI: it’s a joke. There is no possible way to make Acquisitionism > Testimonial

    (FYI: it’s a joke. There is no possible way to make Acquisitionism > Testimonialism > Propertarianism > Natural Law for ‘dummies’, any more than there is formal logic, systems programming, or the calculus. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 15:10:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/986985413402398723

    Reply addressees: @yacks_91 @TrueDilTom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/986981268540805121

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/986981268540805121

  • REGARDING “PROPERTARIANISM FOR DUMMIES” FYI: It’s a joke. There is no possible w

    REGARDING “PROPERTARIANISM FOR DUMMIES”

    FYI: It’s a joke. There is no possible way to make: Acquisitionism -> Testimonialism -> Propertarianism -> Natural Law, for ‘dummies’, any more than there is formal logic, systems programming, or the calculus.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:40:00 UTC

  • A judge of natural law does not depend upon the comprehension of the judged, any

    A judge of natural law does not depend upon the comprehension of the judged, any more than a mathematician on the comprehension of the audience.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:08:00 UTC

  • Understanding is overrated, and volition over-estimated. I don’t expect people t

    Understanding is overrated, and volition over-estimated. I don’t expect people to understand. I only expect them to obey natural law or bear the painful consequences.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:04:00 UTC

  • IT BEGINS WITH THE OATH Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law

    IT BEGINS WITH THE OATH

    Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Violence > Markets > Non Parasitic Order.

    You must make an oath to produce reciprocity; if you produce reciprocity you will as a consequence produce sovereignty; if you produce sovereignty, decisions are only decidable by natural law, and only enforceable by violence – the sum total of which results in markets, and because of markets, the result is a non-parasitic order.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 10:37:00 UTC