Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • “We have reassociated materialism with morality – we can account for morality an

    –“We have reassociated materialism with morality – we can account for morality and moral variation to facilitate reciprocal trads between people with different value systems.”– Dr Brad.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-12 21:44:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734690671926092122

  • It’s because you’re a moral man. Differing in how to achieve ends is very differ

    It’s because you’re a moral man. Differing in how to achieve ends is very different from differing in what is moral and virtuous. I basically don’t disagree with your strategy – at all. I only suggest that there may be others equally possible. -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 19:32:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734295210174132484

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734293962146603085

  • Self defense

    Self defense.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 18:58:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734286461833265281

    Reply addressees: @WIhomereno @catturd2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734286183880954251

  • Hence why I argue for natural law and truth limiting the expression of such thin

    Hence why I argue for natural law and truth limiting the expression of such things. That said we must account for the fact that IQ is what it is, and feminine empathizing creates demand for social construction of a shared narrative becsause they are in fact incapable of independent though, or least, suppression of neuroticism that occurs with independent thought (especially in women).

    I don’t want to intrude on your just criticism but I”ll argue again that the west doesn’t have a problem per se, it has a woman problem. And that if we constrain women’s antisocial and anti-political behavior as thorougly as we have the male (which I believe I have done) then we will provide the social construction necessary to constrian both women and christians.

    I know this may be hard to undersetand for the majority of people but you’ve always been very bright in these matters if I explain them well enough… which I don’t do that often. lol.

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 16:50:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734254418021818368

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734250092885151918

  • Again, the free market is different from markets under rule of law of natural la

    Again, the free market is different from markets under rule of law of natural law. Under rule of law of natural law we can only have moral and ethical markets. Under free markets we do not practice full accounting and therefore we do not have moral and ethical markets. But again, every alternative has failed dramatically. So while we can ‘complete’ modernity by plugging it’s holes, and in doing so better understand human nature, that is different from claiming any system is superior. It’s not. That’s what the 20th and 21st have taught us. Every alternative has failed. Every single one.

    Reply addressees: @OooBardam


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 16:25:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734247930507259912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734222572571517325

  • THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLUNTARY (volition) AND CONSENSUAL (consent) ‘Voluntary’

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLUNTARY (volition) AND CONSENSUAL (consent)
    ‘Voluntary’ is the via positiva of the via negativa ‘Coercive’. So voluntary means ‘not coercive’. We’ve standardized on the use of voluntary because of the legal tradition of the term.

    Consensual is a term between parties, voluntary is a term independent of other parties. As such voluntary accommodates externalities where consent does not.

    The terms “voluntary” and “consensual” both relate to actions or agreements that involve the willingness and agreement of individuals, but they have subtle differences in meaning and usage. Let’s compare and contrast these two terms:

    Voluntary:

    Definition: “Voluntary” refers to something that is done or undertaken by a person’s own choice and free will, without external coercion, pressure, or force. It implies that the individual acted without being compelled or forced to do so.

    Usage: The term “voluntary” is often used in a broad context to describe actions, behaviors, or decisions made without external influence. For example, volunteering for a charity, donating to a cause, or participating in an activity out of one’s own choice are considered voluntary actions.

    Legal and Ethical Implications: In legal and ethical contexts, voluntary actions are typically viewed positively because they reflect individual autonomy and freedom of choice. Consent may also be a part of voluntary actions, but the emphasis is on the absence of coercion.

    Consensual:

    Definition: “Consensual” specifically refers to situations where two or more parties agree or give their mutual consent to engage in a particular activity, relationship, or contract. It implies that all parties involved have willingly and knowingly agreed to the terms or actions.

    Usage: The term “consensual” is often used in situations where informed and mutual agreement is crucial. For example, in legal contexts, consensual relationships, such as consensual sex or consensual contracts, emphasize that all parties involved have willingly agreed without any form of deception or coercion.

    Legal and Ethical Implications: Consent and consensual agreements are essential in various legal and ethical contexts to protect individuals’ rights and ensure that they are not subjected to unwanted or non-consensual actions. Consent is a key component of consensual agreements, and these agreements are typically legally binding.

    In summary, while both “voluntary” and “consensual” involve individual choice and willingness, “voluntary” emphasizes actions or decisions made without external influence, while “consensual” specifically emphasizes mutual agreement between parties. “Consensual” is often used in contexts where ensuring informed agreement is critical, such as in legal agreements or relationships.

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-04 17:04:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1731721152379211776

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1731665645639516391

  • We can and will quickly march back through our institutions of cultural producti

    We can and will quickly march back through our institutions of cultural production – because the people will be with us in doing so. …. The Natural Law is a big tent.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-02 20:18:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1731045210010837387

  • Hoppe’s failing is in making a moral and ideal argument vs a necessary and opera

    Hoppe’s failing is in making a moral and ideal argument vs a necessary and operational one. Claiming on has a ‘moral right’ is meaningless. One either can organize enough people with enough force to produce a ‘moral right’ in fact, or one cannot do so. The question then is why were some European peoples in every age able to do so and why were all other peoples in every age not able to do so?
    The answer is that contrary to libertarian theory, the west is superior at the production of commons – whether commons of doing something or not doing something. Libertarianism is in no small part a marxism of common interests instead of marxism of private property.
    The solution of course is anglo rule of law of the natural law which (as hayek explained) favors the production of commons which are the competitive advantage no other peoples can produce.
    The question then is how to limit the production of those commons. And worse, why democratic participation should include anyone not responsible for the production and maintenance of those commons.

    Reply addressees: @CCrowley100


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-01 12:08:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1730559466200788992

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1730419967571394675

  • We all warrant reciprocity – thats natural law. we have no choice. We must do so

    We all warrant reciprocity – thats natural law. we have no choice. We must do something to not warrant it. So o it is puely objctive – though you might require a bi of education to understand that. Our terms are measurements. precise.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-30 02:48:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1730056128346595497

    Reply addressees: @CarmelloM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1730043493492695542

  • thats not true. there are interests and incentivs but how we act on them is empi

    thats not true. there are interests and incentivs but how we act on them is empirically reciprocal(good) or not(bad).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-29 23:06:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1730000343419789643

    Reply addressees: @CarmelloM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1729978330978615388