THE FEMINIST LEFT’S IR-RECIPROCITY
(from Twitter)(via Noah)
—-“This is why we need to stop worrying about how to appeal to white men in the US. The majority of them have lost their… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=450101815586714&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-17 14:28:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1162733038503104518
( … more)
There are limits to the scope of private property. Property is necessary because of the limits of people’s knowledge in time. However, there are points at which certain forms of private property deny service to consumers, (such as misuse of intellectual property rights) and therefore it is theft from consumers. Why? Because consumers forgo the opportunity for violence, and in doing so pay for the cost of creating that private property. So denying the market a good in order to increase prices and profits is a theft of the costs paid by consumers to create the opportunity for private property. So the limits to private property come from artificial scarcity (denying a good to market), whereas reinforcement of private property comes from the
There are limits to the scope of public property, because there are limits to the amount of knowledge that can exist in any person’s mind, and limits to decision making among groups of individuals, and distortionary effects (basically, perceived risk reduction, limited by the amount of knowledge of the largest population able to exercise it’s will) and the rapidity of timely action, and because of the limits of timely action, limitations on the opportunity cost for the group. ie: increases in private property are an opportunity cost reduction for a group.
The purpose of the union movement is to allow the populists to use threats against the capitalists, without fear that the capitalists can respond in kind, and thereby allow government to profit from intermediation, thereby forming an alliance between the unions and the state, regulated only by the long term (and therefore easily imperceptible) impact of their intervention on tax revenues.
Violence should not be eliminated from our discourse. It is a ruse. Starting with a principle of non violence is and always shall be a ruse.
The fact is, that ALL movements that presume non-violence are attempts at theft of the cost needed to create private property.
Costs are the only means of honest political dialog. Both direct costs and opportunity costs.
The Principle of Non-violence is fraud.
Plain and simple.
Period.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-16 19:50:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102628396190935050
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102628393880515362
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
The Threat Of Revolt, The General Strike, And The Myth Of Non-Violence 28 Monday Dec 2009 Posted by Curt Doolittle in Uncategorized ≈ Leave a comment A tactic used by the vocal left is the threat of violence, or revolt if their needs are not met. The tactic of revolt is ancient. This modern version of revolt is a product of The Myth Of The General Strike. (I am referring to Burnham’s treatment) The contemporary version is the Economic Armageddon and Political Upheaval of the classes. The opposing argument is the libertarian argument for private property, and private capitalism, and the Randian version of Atlas shrugging. Both of these are myths of the general strike. The argument, or myth in any of it’s versions, is disingenuous. Workers will eventually relent, be replaced, or the businesses close. Entrepreneurs will be replaced by others. It is the state who would suffer it’s loss of legitimacy in the event of failure. But a new group would take over in government, and life would go on. An analysis of history tells us that it is much easier for the minority with wealth to pay another minority to violently oppress the peasantry, and to obtain their compliance going forward with commercial incentives and rewards, than it is for a peasantry to organize a movement of a general strike. In fact, the government conducts all general strikes, because without government suport and threats of government violence on business people, they would largely be irrelevant. When a ruling class loses it’s will for violence, the society loses it’s binding mythology. It simply opens it’s ranks for a different group to take over the ruling class, and redefine the existing network-map of property rights, and the dispensation of them. However, provided that the ranks of the elite are open to absorb those ambitous people from all classes, and the elite retain sufficient willingness to use violence, the myth of the revolt is specious. Because people simply need leaders in order to revolt. Before an elite allows itself to be displaced, it commits fraud. They verbally ally themselves with ‘the people’. All societies determine the scope of private and group property differently. (more…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102628393880515362
( … )
Militial participation requires no more than the personal use of violence to protect property rights. The use of the militia is to create and preserve property rights. The use of judges is to resolve conflicts without violence. The use of democratic government is not to create laws, but to create physical commons. The use of public intellectuals, is to carry on the public debate over which commons we may choose to invest in, and which not. The use of ‘religion’ and literature is to teach us these necessary and immutable laws of human cooperation so that we never forget them – and by forgetting them lose our freedom.
You cannot obtain the right of private property at a discount. It is an extremely costly right to possess. It is an extremely costly right to maintain. Those who attempt to gain freedom – property – at a discount, will obtain an inferior product to those who pay for a better one. And the only currency of freedom -property – is violence.
Be armed. Be willing. Be vigilant. And Act.
—–
Curt Doolittle
Kiev, 2013
“Putting violence back into liberty one sentence at a time.”
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-16 11:04:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102626326990301651
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102626324305161814
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
THE NECESSITY, VIRTUE AND MORALITY OF ORGANIZED VIOLENCE by CURT DOOLITTLE on SEPTEMBER 7, 2013 THE SOURCE OF PROPERTY: THE NECESSITY, VIRTUE AND MORALITY OF ORGANIZED VIOLENCE I (we) may not be able to coerce you into accepting freedom – individual monopoly of control over property obtained by voluntary exchange production or homesteading – as a superior form of cooperation to all other forms of cooperation. But you may not coerce me (us) into abandoning freedom as our preferred, committed, required, demanded and threatened form of cooperation. THE SOURCE OF PROPERTY IS VIOLENCE The source of property is the use of violence to create, obtain, and protect it. Only those who performed militial service created private property. Only those who performed militial service obtained private property. Only those who perform militial service will keep private property. A militia is a voluntary alliance of property owners whose common interest is the preservation of private property rights. A militia is not the same as an army, any more than freedom is the same as liberty. You create freedom by using violence. You request or desire liberty from someone else. The purpose of a libertarian government is to create private property through the organized application of violence to create it. And libertarian pacifists and moralists are in fact the reason we are losing it. VIOLENCE IS A VIRTUE. Violence is a virtue not a vice. If all rights are property rights. If property defines morality, then violence to create property is the first moral action upon which all other morality rests. We should encourage the mastery of violence in all men at all times, and the exercise of violence by all men at all times, in the defense of property rights, the highest form of morality that a man can display. Because by acts of violence to preserve property he pays the highest contribution to morality possible. Defense of property does not require words. It requires actions. FREEDOM IS SYNONYMOUS WITH MILITIA The only free people are, and must be, a people whose government is a militia, and whose resolution of disputes over property is decided by judges using the single rule of private property as their criteria for adjudication. A militia is synonymous with enfranchisement. No one else has paid for his or her right of property. They merely free ride on the expenses of others. Therefore, political democracy is synonymous with militial participation. No other meaning is possible. All other attributions are acts of theft by fraud. ( … )
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102626324305161814
THE NECESSITY, VIRTUE AND MORALITY OF ORGANIZED VIOLENCE
by CURT DOOLITTLE on SEPTEMBER 7, 2013
THE SOURCE OF PROPERTY: THE NECESSITY, VIRTUE AND MORALITY OF ORGANIZED VIOLENCE
I (we) may not be able to coerce you into accepting freedom – individual monopoly of control over property obtained by voluntary exchange production or homesteading – as a superior form of cooperation to all other forms of cooperation. But you may not coerce me (us) into abandoning freedom as our preferred, committed, required, demanded and threatened form of cooperation.
THE SOURCE OF PROPERTY IS VIOLENCE
The source of property is the use of violence to create, obtain, and protect it.
Only those who performed militial service created private property.
Only those who performed militial service obtained private property.
Only those who perform militial service will keep private property.
A militia is a voluntary alliance of property owners whose common interest is the preservation of private property rights. A militia is not the same as an army, any more than freedom is the same as liberty. You create freedom by using violence. You request or desire liberty from someone else.
The purpose of a libertarian government is to create private property through the organized application of violence to create it. And libertarian pacifists and moralists are in fact the reason we are losing it.
VIOLENCE IS A VIRTUE.
Violence is a virtue not a vice. If all rights are property rights. If property defines morality, then violence to create property is the first moral action upon which all other morality rests.
We should encourage the mastery of violence in all men at all times, and the exercise of violence by all men at all times, in the defense of property rights, the highest form of morality that a man can display.
Because by acts of violence to preserve property he pays the highest contribution to morality possible.
Defense of property does not require words. It requires actions.
FREEDOM IS SYNONYMOUS WITH MILITIA
The only free people are, and must be, a people whose government is a militia, and whose resolution of disputes over property is decided by judges using the single rule of private property as their criteria for adjudication. A militia is synonymous with enfranchisement. No one else has paid for his or her right of property. They merely free ride on the expenses of others.
Therefore, political democracy is synonymous with militial participation. No other meaning is possible. All other attributions are acts of theft by fraud.
( … )
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-16 11:03:55 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102626324305161814
Of course he doesn’t. He’s negotiating. But conversely, why do Jews keep speaking for US as if you are US?
Reciprocity not pilpul.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-16 02:44:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1162193364202246146
Reply addressees: @RabbiJill
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1162153714242805761
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1162153714242805761
VIOLENCE IS A BEAUTIFUL WORD
April 23rd, 2010
Violence is a beautiful word.
But its beauty is absent from our discourse.
I’m going to put violence into libertarianism.
I’m going to put violence back into politics and economics.
Violence, violence, violence, violence violence. There. I said it again. Get used to it.
I’m going to fix our civilization and its political system by revealing the elephant in the room.
I’m going to talk about violence as a virtue. Something to be cherished, and loved, and appreciated.
Because the source of our prosperity is in our violence.
Markets, Freedom, Property, the product of the organized use of violence.
And no use of violence has ever been so peaceful, so fruitful or so enjoyable.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-16 02:03:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102624198907050027
THE VIRTUE OF VIOLENCE
April 23rd, 2010
The Virtue Of Violence:
“We do not forego violence in exchange for democracy, we forgo violence in exchange for creating and accessing the market. Democracy is simply a means of hiring and firing the administrators of our markets.
We do not exist to serve democracy. Democracy exists to serve the market. And should it cease to do so, it ceases the only reason for its legitimacy or use, and is simply a means of whereby the masses destroy the accumulated prosperity of the market in the greatest act of theft and ruin that a humans can perpetuate.
If we are no longer cooperating in order to maintain our market. Then we no longer need to cooperate to maintain our government. And as such, we no longer need to restrain our violence, so that we may recreate a market and a means of administrating it.
The principles of non violence and non aggression are a means of stealing from us whenever the market is circumvented by those we hire to administrate it. It is an act of deception and fraud. It is an infinite discount on our contribution of forgone opportunity for the purpose of creating the market.
That is the true meaning of the word ‘freedom’: to spend the currency of our violence in creation of the market, our respect for property such that we may cooperate in a division of labor, our time and efforts in the creation of products and services to participate in the market, and our rewards for having done all of the above.
Violence is the source of the market, and the market the source of our prosperity, cooperation, and happiness.
Violence and it’s use in creating and maintaining the market, is man’s greatest achievement.
Violence is a virtue because it is the amount of violence possessed by men, and their creativity in and capacity for using it, and the use of it to create the market, that is the prerequisite for prosperity, and division of labor.”
And there is no other argument for the source of the market, our actions in maintaining it, other than we are slaves or children instead of free men, capable of any creative or destructive act we choose. And I will not surrender my violence, and pay the cost of forgone opportunity to create a market from which I, my family, my friends, my tribe, my culture, may prosper, so that someone may enslave me.”
– Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-16 02:02:16 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102624194453424135
The White Law is a Zero Tolerance Law: Sovereignty, Reciprocity and Property in Toto. Truth, Beauty, and Duty. Rule of Law, Judge and Jury. Markets in Everything.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-13 11:25:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1161237300208164864
I don’t work in terms of belief, but in colloquial speech,if you mean am I willing to continue investing time and effort in the further cooperation under the assumption that there is a human somewhere typing rather than a machine,then yes – as I have no reason to think otherwise.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-12 19:02:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160989869843320832
Reply addressees: @Utleyjacobite @BestyDevosEd @joffiecakes @Boneist @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160988180742627328
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160988180742627328
The problem is freedom of truthful and reciprocal speech. of course we will benefit.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-10 01:58:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160007586592305153
Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160006436635762689
IN REPLY TO:
@Hail__To_You
@curtdoolittle …Do you think the right will be the primary beneficiary of scaling back the First Amendment? I’d say more likely, the primary loser, especially the HBD aware right.” (commenter Lot)
https://t.co/R49Ke3Gvsk
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160006436635762689