When People Are Presented with The Choice They Will Choose P-Law https://ift.tt/2MqGvBt
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 15:40:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163475932000280586
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
We have always had it. It’s our law, the natural law. Sovereignty and Reciprocit
We have always had it. It’s our law, the natural law.
Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, Law and Jury, Voluntary Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:14:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163439186885709824
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163437986853396482
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux The only problem facing western man in the ancient world and in the modern, is that we lacked a book of parables (histories) and scriptures (laws) beyond which no man or woman may tread.
That’s not true any longer. We have our “scripture” of the ancient and modern world.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163437986853396482
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux The only problem facing western man in the ancient world and in the modern, is that we lacked a book of parables (histories) and scriptures (laws) beyond which no man or woman may tread.
That’s not true any longer. We have our “scripture” of the ancient and modern world.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163437986853396482
-
I am quite willing to bet, even my life, that the majority is not like you, but
I am quite willing to bet, even my life, that the majority is not like you, but ethical and moral, and when given the choice of a truthful reciprocal commons where genders, classes, races can conduct exchanges (disciplined behavior for redistribution) in Government – We win.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:04:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163436611255902208
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163436032076988417
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Now you are a naturally dishonest, deceitful, polluter of the informational commons as a practitioner of Abrahamic False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul and Critique. A useful idiot for smarter men. But….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163436032076988417
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Now you are a naturally dishonest, deceitful, polluter of the informational commons as a practitioner of Abrahamic False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul and Critique. A useful idiot for smarter men. But….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163436032076988417
-
I teach: – The Natural Law, – The Science of Testimony, – The Grammars of Truth
I teach:
– The Natural Law,
– The Science of Testimony,
– The Grammars of Truth and Deceit,
– The Logics of Acquisition and Compatibility;
And their application to:
– The strict construction of constitutions, legislation, regulation, and findings of the court we call ‘Law’.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 12:59:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163435389421543424
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163434533611548682
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Now, do you see what I did there? I used categorically, logically, empirically, operationally consistent, fully accounted, speech to end your ability to engage in False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Undue Praise, using Sophism, Critique, and GSRRM.
That is what I teach people.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163434533611548682
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Now, do you see what I did there? I used categorically, logically, empirically, operationally consistent, fully accounted, speech to end your ability to engage in False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Undue Praise, using Sophism, Critique, and GSRRM.
That is what I teach people.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163434533611548682
-
So you do not want rights, you want power to violate the rights of others. There
So you do not want rights, you want power to violate the rights of others. There is only one natural law, one right, from which all other rights descend both logically, operationally, and empirically: Reciprocity. Because other than reciprocity one can only harm, steal & defraud.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 12:53:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163433914054168577
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163433449191092224
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux One needs equal protection UNDER the law to have ‘RIGHTS’. But may only have political ‘POWER’ having demonstrated OBSERVANCE of that law, and achievement under that law: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Jury, and Voluntary Cooperation in every aspect of life.
(You don’t)Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163433449191092224
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux One needs equal protection UNDER the law to have ‘RIGHTS’. But may only have political ‘POWER’ having demonstrated OBSERVANCE of that law, and achievement under that law: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Jury, and Voluntary Cooperation in every aspect of life.
(You don’t)Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163433449191092224
-
You see you have nowhere to go. 1. You want what you want regardless of the cost
You see you have nowhere to go.
1. You want what you want regardless of the cost to others.
2. You want to lie cheat steal, coerce, and force others to give you what you want.
So;
Why should the opposition RECIPROCATE, and just take from you by all you have to offer: enserfment?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 12:39:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163430319560810499
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163429651731091456
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Your desire to preserve lying, cheating, stealing, conspiracy, and oppression of the truth, denial of opportunity for exhange, and generation of conflict, and generation of an authoritarian state not ‘Oppression’, where truth, reciprocity, exchange, not ‘Freedom’?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163429651731091456
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Your desire to preserve lying, cheating, stealing, conspiracy, and oppression of the truth, denial of opportunity for exhange, and generation of conflict, and generation of an authoritarian state not ‘Oppression’, where truth, reciprocity, exchange, not ‘Freedom’?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163429651731091456
-
Your desire to preserve lying, cheating, stealing, conspiracy, and oppression of
Your desire to preserve lying, cheating, stealing, conspiracy, and oppression of the truth, denial of opportunity for exhange, and generation of conflict, and generation of an authoritarian state not ‘Oppression’, where truth, reciprocity, exchange, not ‘Freedom’?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 12:36:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163429651731091456
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163429196045193216
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux How is requiring speech be logical, empirical, operational, reciprocal, fully accounted, when one asserts a claim of Good or True anything other than honest, ethical, and moral – and all other claims just dishonest, unethical, and immoral?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163429196045193216
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux How is requiring speech be logical, empirical, operational, reciprocal, fully accounted, when one asserts a claim of Good or True anything other than honest, ethical, and moral – and all other claims just dishonest, unethical, and immoral?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163429196045193216
-
How is requiring speech be logical, empirical, operational, reciprocal, fully ac
How is requiring speech be logical, empirical, operational, reciprocal, fully accounted, when one asserts a claim of Good or True anything other than honest, ethical, and moral – and all other claims just dishonest, unethical, and immoral?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 12:35:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163429196045193216
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163428510603632642
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux How is requiring we speak Truthfully, Reciprocally, in pursuit of Exchanges in both private and public rather than lie cheat and steal from one another via government, to redistribute to our favored classes, by arbitrary judgement of individuals or masses – other than optimum?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163428510603632642
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux How is requiring we speak Truthfully, Reciprocally, in pursuit of Exchanges in both private and public rather than lie cheat and steal from one another via government, to redistribute to our favored classes, by arbitrary judgement of individuals or masses – other than optimum?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163428510603632642
-
How is requiring we speak Truthfully, Reciprocally, in pursuit of Exchanges in b
How is requiring we speak Truthfully, Reciprocally, in pursuit of Exchanges in both private and public rather than lie cheat and steal from one another via government, to redistribute to our favored classes, by arbitrary judgement of individuals or masses – other than optimum?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 12:32:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163428510603632642
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163427114567262209
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux How is requiring public speech, to the public, in matters commercial, financial, economic, political, and scientific, meet the criteria of Truthful(Scientific and Operational), and Reciprocal, other than preventing lying to the public?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163427114567262209
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux How is requiring public speech, to the public, in matters commercial, financial, economic, political, and scientific, meet the criteria of Truthful(Scientific and Operational), and Reciprocal, other than preventing lying to the public?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163427114567262209
-
How is requiring public speech, to the public, in matters commercial, financial,
How is requiring public speech, to the public, in matters commercial, financial, economic, political, and scientific, meet the criteria of Truthful(Scientific and Operational), and Reciprocal, other than preventing lying to the public?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 12:26:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163427114567262209
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163426121385435136
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Propertarianism (Natural Law) would restore Defamation & extend commercial liability and warranty to the content of economic, political, and scientific speech, made to the public, and convert Free Speech to Free Truthful (meaning Scientific) and Reciprocal Speech. No More Lies.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163426121385435136
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Propertarianism (Natural Law) would restore Defamation & extend commercial liability and warranty to the content of economic, political, and scientific speech, made to the public, and convert Free Speech to Free Truthful (meaning Scientific) and Reciprocal Speech. No More Lies.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163426121385435136