—“It’s like Curt says. The Golden Rule is good but ‘… or else’ is better.”—Stephen Thomas
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 15:27:00 UTC
—“It’s like Curt says. The Golden Rule is good but ‘… or else’ is better.”—Stephen Thomas
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 15:27:00 UTC
NO IT ISN”T COMPLICATED
I don’t think anyone has a hard time understanding this series at all. We can teach it to a ten year old.
1. Via positiva: golden rule.
2. Via negativa: silver rule.
3. Via logica: reciprocity
4. Via existentia: rule of law, jury, and markets in everything.
Else
5. The Iron Rule: Might makes right
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 14:33:00 UTC
THIS IS THE LAW.
The only possible sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and prosperity is created by men willing to insure each other against all threats to the demonstrated interests of each other and the only way to do that is by rule of law of reciprocity and universal warranty of due diligence in its defense.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 14:31:00 UTC
Nope. no free riding.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 03:02:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177780692664627200
Reply addressees: @audger @DisdainforReds @jeffreyatucker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177779948918059008
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177779948918059008
Are you? Who do you free ride on?
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 02:32:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177772945852243969
Reply addressees: @MisterWebb @CultureKancer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177772728167698432
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177772728167698432
Watching libertarians finally give up the fantasy on get on board with Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity, insured by every able bodied man bearing arms, producing commons sufficient to deny every alternative order. I both love and hate being ahead of the curve.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 02:11:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177767714305318913
Propertarianism. Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity. The only possible source of sovereignty, liberty, and freedom: reciprocal insurance of everyone’s demonstrated interests (property) by every man able bodied man, producing sufficient commons to deny all alternatives.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 02:09:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177767217808707586
Reply addressees: @DisdainforReds @jeffreyatucker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177734801572470787
IN REPLY TO:
@DisdainforReds
@jeffreytucker What how
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177734801572470787
Humor from a Follower (David German)
If you don’t know the meaning of ‘incremental suppression’ it’s the result of the systematic application of the natural law of reciprocity (tort), to each innovation in the means of imposing costs on the demonstrated interests of others. https://t.co/OWffZHLtnJ

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 20:25:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177680592634294274
Well you mean you’re confused. Because I teach many people who specialize in testimonial truth, the natural law of reciprocity, and the defeat of sophism, idealism, pseudoscience, supernaturalism, The construction of lying, ORRGSM, and the Abrahamic method of deceit. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 17:48:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177641079346204672
Reply addressees: @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177640288615043072
IN REPLY TO:
@wil_da_beast630
@curtdoolittle @FernandoLeanme I’m also not religious at all, a Jew, white, at all friendly to Marxism, solely American by background: the confusion here seems near absolute.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177640288615043072
So the tests are pretty simple: Truth Telling, Realism-naturalism-empiricism, rule of law by reciprocity, a professional bureaucracy free of corruption, and a market in all aspects of life, and the suppression of the rates of reproduction of the underclasses.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 17:14:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177632560630943746
Reply addressees: @roytapel @JohnMarkSays @NoGuiltStoic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177632228760834048
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@roytapel @JohnMarkSays @NoGuiltStoic … are taking our technology but retaining their cultures and demographics (and china also will drop below 100avg iq by 2050), and south america and indonesia are in for a century or more of slow if not impossible development.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177632228760834048
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@roytapel @JohnMarkSays @NoGuiltStoic … are taking our technology but retaining their cultures and demographics (and china also will drop below 100avg iq by 2050), and south america and indonesia are in for a century or more of slow if not impossible development.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177632228760834048