Eugenics in P-Law https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/eugenics-in-p-law/
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 02:08:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190450454452412416
Eugenics in P-Law https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/eugenics-in-p-law/
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 02:08:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190450454452412416
(Curt Doolittle) The only eugenic process Natural Law relies upon is markets. in other words, if you (your family) is self supporting, and not engaging in irreciprocity, we have no other means of testing your fitness other than demonstrated fitness. If you (your family) is not self supporting, an engages in irreciprocity, no matter your excuse, then you are in fact, demonstrating unfitness. (Bill Joslin) Fitness being akin to “good” – anything not unfit, is fit. Fitness remains undecidable (only demonstrable) because of the causal density and unpredictability of future outcomes. But unfitness remains a provisional known (a known subject to being updated with new information). This the demarcation between HARD eugenics (attempting direct control over natural eugenics) and SOFT P-Eugenics would be “anything not unfit remains fit (a fitness candidate) – or rather, we P-eugenics are achieved by NOT practicing dysgenics. (Curt Doolittle) P-law is via negativa, meaning do not reproduce dysgenically, it is not via-positiva, meaning culling of people. It does leave open the possibility of termination for catastrophic birth defects. We don’t answer the question of abortion because it is undecidable under law. It is only decidable within a polity. P-law does not prohibit genetic innovation (Transhuanism) as long as it reversible in the next generation and warranteed. TESTOSTERONE (Curt Doolittle) The generational sink in testosterone levels as far as I know, is almost entirely due to failure to exercise and engage in dominance play, and can be restored by physical activity – we know this because we see people do it every day. THere is some negativity to BPA and other chemicals but tis is as easily rectified as requiring all foods to be shipped (more expensively, and less environmentally costly ) in glass containers. (Bill Joslin) Drop in testosterone relates to prolonged.low level stress, or rather a higher baseline stress level – for example the constant stimulus of living in urban centers, or prolonged financial stress…i.e. anomie Also – occupations that have intermittent physical stress coupled with enough recovery time, tend to elevate testosterone. for example: jobs which include physical exertion but don’t include “taking work home with you” (no worrying about after hours.)
(Curt Doolittle) The only eugenic process Natural Law relies upon is markets. in other words, if you (your family) is self supporting, and not engaging in irreciprocity, we have no other means of testing your fitness other than demonstrated fitness. If you (your family) is not self supporting, an engages in irreciprocity, no matter your excuse, then you are in fact, demonstrating unfitness. (Bill Joslin) Fitness being akin to “good” – anything not unfit, is fit. Fitness remains undecidable (only demonstrable) because of the causal density and unpredictability of future outcomes. But unfitness remains a provisional known (a known subject to being updated with new information). This the demarcation between HARD eugenics (attempting direct control over natural eugenics) and SOFT P-Eugenics would be “anything not unfit remains fit (a fitness candidate) – or rather, we P-eugenics are achieved by NOT practicing dysgenics. (Curt Doolittle) P-law is via negativa, meaning do not reproduce dysgenically, it is not via-positiva, meaning culling of people. It does leave open the possibility of termination for catastrophic birth defects. We don’t answer the question of abortion because it is undecidable under law. It is only decidable within a polity. P-law does not prohibit genetic innovation (Transhuanism) as long as it reversible in the next generation and warranteed. TESTOSTERONE (Curt Doolittle) The generational sink in testosterone levels as far as I know, is almost entirely due to failure to exercise and engage in dominance play, and can be restored by physical activity – we know this because we see people do it every day. THere is some negativity to BPA and other chemicals but tis is as easily rectified as requiring all foods to be shipped (more expensively, and less environmentally costly ) in glass containers. (Bill Joslin) Drop in testosterone relates to prolonged.low level stress, or rather a higher baseline stress level – for example the constant stimulus of living in urban centers, or prolonged financial stress…i.e. anomie Also – occupations that have intermittent physical stress coupled with enough recovery time, tend to elevate testosterone. for example: jobs which include physical exertion but don’t include “taking work home with you” (no worrying about after hours.)
What Does “Bait Into Hazard” Mean? https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/what-does-bait-into-hazard-mean/
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 01:41:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190443897857695747
—“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean. Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—
If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution. If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard. if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard. In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.
—“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean. Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—
If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution. If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard. if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard. In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.
WHAT DOES “BAIT INTO HAZARD” MEAN?
—“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean
Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—
If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral.
If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution.
If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard.
if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard.
In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 18:42:00 UTC
RT @curtdoolittle: @BlackPillTrader every man a sheriff, whether he wants to be or not.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 12:53:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190250539222732800
What is more abominable? Hiding behind lies in order to free ride upon the emotional and intellectual works of others, or pointing a finger of accusation at liars who claim virtue in parasitic free riding on the emotional and intellectual works of others?
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 01:15:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190074892512833538
Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190073518907629569
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190073518907629569
every man a sheriff, whether he wants to be or not.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 00:34:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190064413191163905
Reply addressees: @BlackPillTrader
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190063062436454406
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190063062436454406