in western natural law, one can propose a superior, reciprocal and truthful solution, but one cannot underming the current solution without providing one that is better.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 14:46:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193540523686088706
in western natural law, one can propose a superior, reciprocal and truthful solution, but one cannot underming the current solution without providing one that is better.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 09:46:00 UTC
Only if you say something both false and irreciprocal. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 04:04:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193016604906442753
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193014515341897728
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193014515341897728
Only European Peoples invented Truth before face; Truth regardless of cost to the dominance hierarchy; Rule of Law by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Testimony and Jury; Resulting in Markets in Every aspect of Life: Continuous Adaptation – Faster Than The Rest.
#Trump @realDonaldTrump https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1192923488471986176
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 01:18:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192974698293936128
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1192923488471986176
Suppression of expression, discipline in mind, emotion, body, reproduction (sex), and soul; truthful speech no matter the cost; defense of life, property, contract and commons no matter the cost; heroism, excellence, and beauty regardless of cost; extension of christian love …
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 14:28:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192811246451601408
Reply addressees: @FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192810504701513728
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei That sentence is the “Physical Law of Man” and there are no exceptions.
So, Africans, like Indians who also blame Whites (who failed to complete the rise of colonies) but not Muslims (who made all colonies decline), or Nature (for climate and geography), *Must Know Better* also.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192810504701513728
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei That sentence is the “Physical Law of Man” and there are no exceptions.
So, Africans, like Indians who also blame Whites (who failed to complete the rise of colonies) but not Muslims (who made all colonies decline), or Nature (for climate and geography), *Must Know Better* also.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192810504701513728
WORDS ARE TERMS OF CONTRACTS FOR RECIPROCITY OR FRAUDS TO AVOID IT
Words are contracts for meaning in pursuit of reciprocity, or they are avoidance of contracts for meaning, in pursuit of irreciprocity: fraud. There is only one universal standard of weight and measure in speech, providing universal decidability in speech, and that is testimony in of the operational, empirical, internally consistent, coherent, complete, and surviving parsimony in competition with the alternatives.
Lke all humans I make mistakes. Unlike most humans I never err. This claim is not difficult: claim nothing is true you cannot testify to. Position all that you cannot testify to as a question rather than a statement. 😉 -cheers
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 12:07:00 UTC
I am not going to let the left ‘mal-appropriate’ Reciprocity the way they have inverted rule-of-law, liberalism, freedom, equality, into explicit lies. Morality = Reciprocity within the Limits of Proportionality. Reciprocity increases, and Disproportionality Decreases, Cohesion.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 14:47:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192453637232087040
Reply addressees: @cashmoneyglock @studentactivism
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192453015363604480
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@cashmoneyglock @studentactivism You are confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality. We have more reciprocity in the US than anywhere on earth because we have common law. We have insufficient consumer protection (warranty,liability) especially in truthful speech (fully informed), especially in Consumer Finance.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192453015363604480
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@cashmoneyglock @studentactivism You are confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality. We have more reciprocity in the US than anywhere on earth because we have common law. We have insufficient consumer protection (warranty,liability) especially in truthful speech (fully informed), especially in Consumer Finance.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192453015363604480
You are confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality. We have more reciprocity in the US than anywhere on earth because we have common law. We have insufficient consumer protection (warranty,liability) especially in truthful speech (fully informed), especially in Consumer Finance.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 14:45:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192453015363604480
Reply addressees: @cashmoneyglock @studentactivism
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192440006867963904
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192440006867963904
—“Its a modality of life that can go either way but has apply universally. I think we currently have the worst of both worlds. No reciprocity.”—Tyrone Jackson @cashmoneyglock
You are confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality. We have more reciprocity in the US than anywhere on earth because we have common law.
We have insufficient consumer protection (warranty,liability) especially in truthful speech (fully informed), especially in Consumer Finance.
We might argue that the state, through contractual asymmetric enforcement (bundling, optimistic presentation without warranty and responsibility-liability, entrapments, penalty clauses etc ) permits and facilitates irrecipprocity in commerce, but we cannot make the case that the state or economy produces irreciprocal conditions. Just the opposite.
I am not going to let the left ‘mal-appropriate’ Reciprocity the way they have inverted rule-of-law, liberalism, freedom, equality, into explicit lies.
Morality = Reciprocity within the Limits of Proportionality. Reciprocity increases, and Disproportionality Decreases, Cohesion.
The Entrepreneurial billionaires’ aren’t the problem. The multi-millionaries in the financial sector are – and every single one of them is a parasite upon our people.
Hugs.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 09:53:00 UTC
HOW DOES P-LAW ADDRESS HARM TO OUR PEOPLE ON FOREIGN SOIL?
—“I know you rarely address specific events but how would P address what happened with the mormon family murdered in Mexico today, if at all? Thanks in advance.”—
(a) Under P-law all men in the polity are granted unlimited Letters of Marque for the Restitution, Punishment, and Prevention of Repetition of Crimes against our people “upon any land that admits them”, and may use any means at their disposal, and obtain any rewards (loot) they can obtain the process as compensation, and they are insured by the polity, court, and military for having done their service.
(b) Under P-law if crimes are committed against our people, “upon any land that admits them” and if restitution, punishment, and prevention is not delivered, with urgency, then the military shall use all means at its disposal to extract restitution, impose punishment, and prevention by *collective punishment* such that no repetition occurs. (that means kill everyone in 100m radius etc, or whatever it takes to get the enemy to turn in the criminals)
This means that:
1) countries will be careful admitting our people (good)
2) countries will pay us off if they have to.
3) locals will turn over people if they can.
4) families will turn in their own
5) ‘adventurers’ can punish such people for fun and profit.
6) “…and the world will once again tremble”
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 22:37:00 UTC