RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMMONS IS THE HIGHEST COST
Every Man A Sheriff
Truth before face
Duty before Self
Excellence before Adequacy
Production before Consumption
Home before Reproduction… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=527065217890373&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 17:13:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204811566660640769
Moral and Immoral, ethical and unethical, are logical and empirical absolutes: Reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. Superior peoples demonstrate superior reciprocity by superior truth, promise, contract, markets and holding formation and in maneuver in war.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 16:00:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204793153427038214
Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204664998632607746
IN REPLY TO:
@StefanMolyneux
So funny people calling me “old” like it’s not going to happen to them.
Pro tip: getting older beats the only other alternative.
Older people are here to remind you that you ain’t gonna be young forever.
Plan accordingly.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204664998632607746
Every Man A Sheriff
Truth before face
Duty before Self
Excellence before Adequacy
Production before Consumption
Home before Reproduction
Heroism, Paternalism, Sky Worshipping, Militaristic,Expansionist, Sovereign, Reciprocal, Contractual, Entrepreneurial, Markets in Everything.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 15:55:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204791751606775810
Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204790668960452609
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@StefanMolyneux When we stopped dueling over insolence, beating the young for their insolence, and putting women in stocks for their insolence, we de-facto licensed insolence, ignorance, sophism, undermining, indiscipline, and our ability to capitalize behavioral, normative, and genetic commons.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204790668960452609
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@StefanMolyneux When we stopped dueling over insolence, beating the young for their insolence, and putting women in stocks for their insolence, we de-facto licensed insolence, ignorance, sophism, undermining, indiscipline, and our ability to capitalize behavioral, normative, and genetic commons.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204790668960452609
Under P-Law Horowitz would be prosecutable for extraordinary damages for failure of full accounting and failure of strict construction when making (promising) an assertion (claim) without qualifying the chain of causality.
Under P-law none of this political deceit is possible.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 15:43:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204788865661382657
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMMONS IS THE HIGHEST COST
Every Man A Sheriff
Truth before face
Duty before Self
Excellence before Adequacy
Production before Consumption
Home before Reproduction
Heroism, Paternalism, Sky Worshipping, Militaristic,Expansionist, Sovereign, Reciprocal, Contractual, Entrepreneurial, Markets in Everything.
The rest of mankind is Demonstrably Unfit.
Superiority is demonstrated by the evidence.
Our one weakness is Christian tolerance
Which is but a means of obscuring
Cowardice and Convenience.
We are raiders, vikings, pirates, conquerors,
and the rest are unfit for our way of Law.
When we stopped dueling over insolence, beating the young for their insolence, and putting women in stocks for their insolence, we de-facto licensed insolence, ignorance, sophism, undermining, indiscipline, and our ability to capitalize behavioral, normative, and genetic commons.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 12:13:00 UTC
—“Under P-Law Horowitz would be prosecutable for extraordinary damages for failure of full accounting and failure of strict construction when making (promising) an assertion (claim) without qualifying the chain of causality.
Under P-law none of this political deceit is possible.”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 12:11:00 UTC
THE NATURAL LAW ON PORNOGRAPHY
(from twitter)
—“Do you believe that banning all porn is ridiculous? If so, how come? What would the laws under the Propertarian constitution be regarding… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=526622927934602&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 03:01:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204597017076535296
c) there is some very bad behavior at the lower end of the market.
Under natural law if its out of the commons, it’s voluntary, then it’s not a subject for P-law. The rest is just either a product harm (tort), or baiting into hazard (tort), for the law’s Market to solve.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 02:39:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204591542859653127
Reply addressees: @EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204590384623636481
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346 This is a deeper question than it appears – hard for twitter.
a) must keep it out of the commons, and the internet is a commons, so there must be some ‘gateway’ (opt in) in order to access it. b) long term effects are far far worse in every regard than we imagined. and …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204590384623636481
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346 This is a deeper question than it appears – hard for twitter.
a) must keep it out of the commons, and the internet is a commons, so there must be some ‘gateway’ (opt in) in order to access it. b) long term effects are far far worse in every regard than we imagined. and …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204590384623636481
This is a deeper question than it appears – hard for twitter.
a) must keep it out of the commons, and the internet is a commons, so there must be some ‘gateway’ (opt in) in order to access it. b) long term effects are far far worse in every regard than we imagined. and …
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 02:35:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204590384623636481
Reply addressees: @EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204588912968192000
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204588912968192000
THE NATURAL LAW ON PORNOGRAPHY
(from twitter)
—“Do you believe that banning all porn is ridiculous? If so, how come? What would the laws under the Propertarian constitution be regarding porn?”—@EnlightenedNPC
This is a deeper question than it appears – a hard topic for twitter. I’ll try:
a) we must keep it out of the commons, and the internet is a commons, so there must be some ‘gateway’ (opt in) in order to access it.
b) long term effects are far far worse in every regard than we imagined. And;
c) there is some very bad behavior at the lower end of the market.
Under natural law if its out of the commons, it’s voluntary, then it’s not a subject for P-law. The rest is just either a product harm (tort), or baiting into hazard (tort), for the law’s Market to solve.
I am fairly sure that the legal market would solve it rather quickly under p-law and we would be left with high production value work by studios on one end, and selfies on the other. That’s because baiting into hazard (enticing people in vulnerable positions into such behavior for money) would be prosecutable by anyone – not just the victim. It would be almost impossible to produce anything outside of a studio system with professionals, because it’s almost impossible to avoid baiting into hazard otherwise.
And beyond that it’s a Political question (“We just don’t want it here”), or an empirical question (“Accumulate evidence and inability to voluntarily or institutionally regulate means we have to ban it.”).
Personally (not the natural law) I have come to understand that while I’m intuitively libertarian, the experiment with porn has (a surprise to me) demonstrated that it’s a net negative, but that it is better to regulate a net negative than it is to turn it into a black market. I’d ban it in my neck of the woods. But my opinion doesn’t mean anything. it’s just a preference.
My posts on Pornography are here:
https://propertarianism.com/?s=pornography
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 22:01:00 UTC