TABOOS
What? I answer every Taboo. My job is to end the postwar industrialization of lying by pseudoscience and sophism and return us to our Natural Law of Reciprocity. I worked on Religion last year, and the Jewish Question now. Truth Creates and Settles Controversy – PAINFULLY.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 20:08:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207029829977202694
Rule of law by reciprocity within the limits of proportionality (defection), where Reciprocity consists of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition upon the demonstrated of interests of others by externality.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 17:31:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206990380237021185
Reply addressees: @ChristaylorBrwn @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206990079526363141
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ChristaylorBrwn @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump You either have rule of law by Sovereignty, Demonstrated Interest, Reciprocity, Testimonial Truth and Contract, or you have discretionary rule that seeks to license some form of violation of sovereignty and reciprocity by deceit.
Capitalism is another lie by half truth.
Period.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206990079526363141
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ChristaylorBrwn @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump You either have rule of law by Sovereignty, Demonstrated Interest, Reciprocity, Testimonial Truth and Contract, or you have discretionary rule that seeks to license some form of violation of sovereignty and reciprocity by deceit.
Capitalism is another lie by half truth.
Period.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206990079526363141
You either have rule of law by Sovereignty, Demonstrated Interest, Reciprocity, Testimonial Truth and Contract, or you have discretionary rule that seeks to license some form of violation of sovereignty and reciprocity by deceit.
Capitalism is another lie by half truth.
Period.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 17:30:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206990079526363141
Reply addressees: @ChristaylorBrwn @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206989543011958789
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ChristaylorBrwn @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump The false dichotomy of Capitalism / socialism-communism, like Marxism, Neoconservatism (trotskyism), Libertarianism (rothbardianism), Feminism, Postmodernism and Denialism(Political correctness) are just the modern era’s equivalent of judaism, christianity and islam: big lies.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206989543011958789
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ChristaylorBrwn @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump The false dichotomy of Capitalism / socialism-communism, like Marxism, Neoconservatism (trotskyism), Libertarianism (rothbardianism), Feminism, Postmodernism and Denialism(Political correctness) are just the modern era’s equivalent of judaism, christianity and islam: big lies.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206989543011958789
So whenever someone is using the term ‘capitalism’ instead of rule of law (Lule of Law of Sovereignty in demonstrated interests (property) and reciprocity (productive, fully informed, warrantied voluntary transfer, free of externality) they’re participating in 2nd gen Big Lies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 17:26:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206988982598418434
Reply addressees: @ChristaylorBrwn @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206988550106943488
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ChristaylorBrwn @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump 6) rule of law and the institution of property = commons, and the function of the state (military, judiciary) is to defend commons, and the function of the government(however it’s done) is to produce and maintain commons. And the purpose of markets is production of consumption.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206988550106943488
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ChristaylorBrwn @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump 6) rule of law and the institution of property = commons, and the function of the state (military, judiciary) is to defend commons, and the function of the government(however it’s done) is to produce and maintain commons. And the purpose of markets is production of consumption.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206988550106943488
Free speech but with warranty of due diligence against irreciprocity, false promise, baiting into hazard etc.
This will end the second abrahamic dark age started by the jewish counter-revolution against science that began with Boaz, Marx, Freud, against truth, sci, western civ.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 15:37:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206961664672911362
Reply addressees: @drownded @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206961029206466561
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@drownded @paulkrugman Fixes US (anglo common law) constitutions by strict construction by formal operational logic, with strict definitions, of all terms currently flexible under common and continental law. Restores rule of law. Restores Defamation, Outlaws rent seeking, and Baiting into Hazard.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206961029206466561
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@drownded @paulkrugman Fixes US (anglo common law) constitutions by strict construction by formal operational logic, with strict definitions, of all terms currently flexible under common and continental law. Restores rule of law. Restores Defamation, Outlaws rent seeking, and Baiting into Hazard.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206961029206466561
Speaking a lie does not require intent, but a failure of due diligence not to lie. Speaking the truth does not require one intends to.
Intent determines punishment, harm does not, and so… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=531709000759328&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 14:12:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206940298582142976
Not because it’s bad for society – I don’t do shoulds unless that’s the question. Instead, it’s because humans demonstrate retaliation against any and all impositions upon demonstrated interests – its empirical, rational, and logical. It’s the min criteria for not killing others.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 05:02:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206439329838632960
Reply addressees: @Abhiman11678846
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206434227891269632
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206434227891269632
Good question, but no. An opportunity is not a demonstrated interest (it hasn’t been homesteaded), so seizing opportunities is not imposing costs on a demonstrated interest.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 04:52:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206436886069284864
Reply addressees: @Abhiman11678846
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206435249934274561
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206435249934274561
That isn’t a criticism. it isn’t a fault. 😉
I’m ok with y’all having fantasy worlds.
I’m just not ok with you having the ability to act on fantasies if it affects others – any more than any other drug user. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 02:32:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206401635058167808
Reply addressees: @YvesBurri
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206395551006085122
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206395551006085122
https://propertarianism.com/?s=abortionFYI: NATURAL LAW ON ABORTION
Abortion is the hard problem of natural law.
Just like religion is the had problem of social science.
Just like testimonial truth is the hard problem of philosophy.
Just like market government is the hard problem of political philosophy
Just like rule of law by reciprocity is the hard problem of group evolutionary strategy.
https://propertarianism.com/?s=abortionUpdated Dec 15, 2019, 5:40 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-15 17:40:00 UTC