“Thou shalt not lie – That is what P boils down to.”
—James Dmitro Makienko
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 09:46:00 UTC
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
“Thou shalt not lie – That is what P boils down to.” —James Dmitro Makienko
-
Under P-Law claiming you were or your ancestors were oppressed if (a) domesticat
Under P-Law claiming you were or your ancestors were oppressed if (a) domesticated, (b) forcibly integrated into civilization, rule of law, truthful speech, nuclear family, self sufficiency, sacredness of the commons, duty, piety (c) fulfilling an economic necessity, is a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 09:43:00 UTC
-
10) They work to create the myth (false promise) that physical law and natural l
10) They work to create the myth (false promise) that physical law and natural law are oppressions by man. And that western aristocracy oppresses man, rather than that western man has discovered optimums: work in concert with physical and natural law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-16 14:35:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217817566007250945
Reply addressees: @HliosX @MurraySuggests
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217816769253052416
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@HliosX @MurraySuggests 9) Cultural Marxists (Frankfurt School) to undermine heroism, duty, honor, excellence, beauty, all of which are methods of paying costs of contribution to the commons.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217816769253052416
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@HliosX @MurraySuggests 9) Cultural Marxists (Frankfurt School) to undermine heroism, duty, honor, excellence, beauty, all of which are methods of paying costs of contribution to the commons.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217816769253052416
-
As such private property evolves slowly from commons. That’s the evidence everyw
As such private property evolves slowly from commons. That’s the evidence everywhere and always. Property itself is a commons. Not an ideal, not theological, but real.
Why did property evolve? Division of labor – demonstrated interests, inheritance of tools, animals, land.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 21:43:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217563057049755652
Reply addressees: @HliosX @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217562749338890240
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@HliosX @Ozpin_88 2) reality is that ethics are MADE by necessity within a political context. They aren’t ideals (imaginary). The scope of property is discovered and normalized. Rights are made by creating courts to adjudicate them. You have to produce a polity that can survive opposition.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217562749338890240
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@HliosX @Ozpin_88 2) reality is that ethics are MADE by necessity within a political context. They aren’t ideals (imaginary). The scope of property is discovered and normalized. Rights are made by creating courts to adjudicate them. You have to produce a polity that can survive opposition.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217562749338890240
-
1) So you’re avoiding the test right? Ethics exist only within what is possible
1) So you’re avoiding the test right? Ethics exist only within what is possible in the context.Ethics of hunter gatherers, early farmers,subsistence farmers, agrarian revolution farmers, industrialists, and technologists are different for a reason. You are FIRST bound by reality.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 21:41:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217562446942081024
Reply addressees: @HliosX @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217558968240943106
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217558968240943106
-
“Justice is a process for reverting violations of reciprocity.”— Martin Štěpán
—“Justice is a process for reverting violations of reciprocity.”— Martin Štěpán
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 19:54:00 UTC
-
(d) we can decide all conflicts by tests of reciprocity.(true) (e) Reciprocity i
…(d) we can decide all conflicts by tests of reciprocity.(true)
(e) Reciprocity in the behavior of others toward you is universally preferable (maybe, I sure can think of cases where it’s false)
(There is no via-positiva. Sorry.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 23:31:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217227663699578880
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217227071237361664
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DeplorableDJDJ @Ozpin_88 Which are we stating here:
(a) all people have the same preference for reciprocity (false)
(b) the optimum of the distribution of preferences will evolve to reciprocity (true)
(c) in a perfect world everyone would have the same ideal preference of reciprocity (so what)
…Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217227071237361664
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@DeplorableDJDJ @Ozpin_88 Which are we stating here:
(a) all people have the same preference for reciprocity (false)
(b) the optimum of the distribution of preferences will evolve to reciprocity (true)
(c) in a perfect world everyone would have the same ideal preference of reciprocity (so what)
…Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217227071237361664
-
Which are we stating here: (a) all people have the same preference for reciproci
Which are we stating here:
(a) all people have the same preference for reciprocity (false)
(b) the optimum of the distribution of preferences will evolve to reciprocity (true)
(c) in a perfect world everyone would have the same ideal preference of reciprocity (so what)
…
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 23:28:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217227071237361664
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217204490790690816
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217204490790690816
-
It’s bait. We prefer reciprocity from others but we prefer rent seeking for ours
It’s bait. We prefer reciprocity from others but we prefer rent seeking for ourselves. That’s step one of the argument. Man isnt moral. Morality is just an advantage. And it’s only an advantage within limits. And so what are the personal, social, political, and national limits?
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 20:33:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217182974225145857
Reply addressees: @Ozpin_88 @DeplorableDJDJ
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217179797513801729
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217179797513801729
-
Individual humans have no intrinsic value. “You are what you do” What we do is h
Individual humans have no intrinsic value.
“You are what you do”
What we do is harmful, neutral, or reciprocal (beneficial) to others.
In western civ, if you do your duty to the commons, you are due respect.
If you don’t do your duty to the commons – you aren’t.
Harmony by Duty.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 19:54:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217173281574395904