(Strict construction of natural law.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 21:34:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244015077352669184
Reply addressees: @spacepencilcase
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244012402682839041
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
“IF WE CANNOT HAVE ANCESTOR WORSHIP THEN BY RECIPROCITY YOU MAY NOT EITHER.” Fin
“IF WE CANNOT HAVE ANCESTOR WORSHIP THEN BY RECIPROCITY YOU MAY NOT EITHER.”
Fin.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 16:43:00 UTC
-
That’s because we don’t enforce the law of reciprocity including reciprocity in
That’s because we don’t enforce the law of reciprocity including reciprocity in truthful speech.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 13:29:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243530538658471936
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243527487432339457
-
Ethics (Morality): Productive, Fully informed, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrate
Ethics (Morality): Productive, Fully informed, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warrantied, by due diligence against error bias and deceit, within the limits of restitution.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 13:27:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243530073543774208
Reply addressees: @KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243529370662309888
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726 No more sophistry. Philosophy is closed. Science has fully replaced it. P-law is complete. Including Metaphysics, Epistemology, Psychology, Ethics, Sociology, Economics, Politics, Law, Group Strategy, and Aesthetics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243529370662309888
-
“Propertarianism is the best case for individualism as it establishes the costs.
—“Propertarianism is the best case for individualism as it establishes the costs. Sovereignty requires agency requires the aptitude to incur and manage the costs.”—Rick Tavi
(CD: Well done. I set out to restore ability, responsibility, un-substitutability, and cost to search for Freedom and Liberty by permission at other’s discretion – resulting in creation of Sovereignty in fact by our decision. I did so because when working on Hoppe I understood argumentation ethics were nonsense. Violence, like boycott, is never, ever, ever off the political table.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 11:36:00 UTC
-
Reciprocity is decidable, just as bounded rationality is decidable. you can’t fa
Reciprocity is decidable, just as bounded rationality is decidable. you can’t falsify reciprocity any more than you can falsify bounded rationality. why? They’re synonyms. Now, that’s a logical necessity. Now we test the logical necessity and it holds up in across all civs.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 21:01:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242557083729506304
Reply addressees: @PaulKnowsBest2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242556495709028352
-
Under natural law you can say whatever you want as long as you warranty the trut
Under natural law you can say whatever you want as long as you warranty the truthfulness of it.
Twitter would become useful rather rapidly.
Right now it’s just dompaine amusement.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 20:58:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242556478143299584
Reply addressees: @c25113297 @Sinj1 @MarkHarrisNYC @willwilkinson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242554215211376640
-
I am not responsible for others’ thoughts any more than I am for yours. I do my
I am not responsible for others’ thoughts any more than I am for yours. I do my job: end the 20th century industrialization of deceit by the false promise of freedom from genetic, gender, class, economic, cultural, differences by Marxism, Postmodernism, and Human Science Denial.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-17 16:11:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239947389923995648
Reply addressees: @JeffShafer @middleageriot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239946235559190532
-
So all we must agree upon is defeat of the enemy, and the natural law of recipro
So all we must agree upon is defeat of the enemy, and the natural law of reciprocity. The excuses we use for both are merely frames of mind.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-17 15:50:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239942083206696961
Reply addressees: @FOSTERMMXXII @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239941714632196098
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@FOSTERMMXXII @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnMarkSays One of the ways we use P-Law to identify false claims is the use of pseudoscientific language as a pretense of knowledge or claim. Will people still require Mythology, theology(Empathic), Literature and philosophy( Pragmatic ) in addition to History, Science, Law, (Ruling)? Yes.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1239941714632196098
-
And it’s far easier than you’d think. Because we don’t need to know if a claim i
And it’s far easier than you’d think. Because we don’t need to know if a claim is true or not, just whether it is testifiable, reciprocal, evolutionary, warrantable, restitutable or not.
P-Law, The Formal, Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity of the European Peoples.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-16 17:14:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239601002728300546
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239601001658822662
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
We can end the century and a half of pseudoscience, sophistry, and lies by the false promise of freedom from physical laws of nature, the natural law of cooperation, and the evolutionary law of transcendence: marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1239601001658822662