Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • THE LIES The Lies: “I reject, I disapprove, I disagree, I’m wary, I don’t believ

    THE LIES

    The Lies: “I reject, I disapprove, I disagree, I’m wary, I don’t believe, or engaging in ridicule, shaming, moralizing or psychologizing.”

    None of these are a form of reciprocity: an argument – they’re counter-signaling in lieu of argument. And lacking argument because of one’s ignorance or incompetence. And cowardice in admission of one’s ignorance or incompetence.

    An intellectually honest man does not counter signal like a woman, but either seeks to understand by asking questions, or posits a counter proposition that is open to equal criticism. counter signaling is a violation of reciprocity – a pretense of knowledge when one has none.

    You have only THREE intellectually honest propositions:

    … 1. Refutation.

    … 2. Competition.

    … 3. Question.

    Or the female (dishonest)

    … 4. Disapproval by counter signaling

    One cannot disapprove of a truth only a preference.

    The female cannot use force, or necessarily physically cooperate, or even use organized force or competition, but she can deprive men of sex, affection, care, and advocacy, and engage in counter signaling, or undermining, and rally other women to counter signal, and undermine. That is their weapon of competition of necessity. It is the means by which the females CREATE MARKET DEMAND for men to SATISFY THEM in exchange for sex, affection, care, advocacy and perhaps most importantly, abstinence from undermining you and those you cooperate with.

    This is why, if not one family one vote, then men and women require different houses, and both the legal prohibition on male violence, as well as the legal prohibition on female avoidance of argument, undermining, and reputation destruction so that both genders are reduced as are all others in the marketplace to cooperation by voluntary exchanges.

    Which was the point of marriage and one family one vote – and one of the principle means by which women’s natural irreciprocity and social superpredation was let loose from the pandora’s box of enfranchisement without equal legal suppression of the female means of superpredation that we had evolved in legal suppression of the man’s means of superpredation.

    We are not consious of the causes of our behavior.

    Which is what I seek to cure.

    And which will restore us to reciprocity.

    And end the conflict.

    And force us back into markets.

    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 12:27:00 UTC

  • THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW – ON THE LEFT 0. Reciprocity is the only reason for bot

    THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW – ON THE LEFT

    0. Reciprocity is the only reason for both sides to refrain from predation, parasitism, or boycott – cooperation or the option to cooperate is more valuable than non-cooperation, and the prevention of future cooperation.

    1. We create reciprocity via negativa by not imposing costs on others demonstrated interests

    2. The name we use for Demonstrated interests is property.

    3. In P-Law we use property in toto as the definition of property, meaning the empirical evidence of what demonstrated interests people defend.

    4. We are all dependent upon the informational commons for information.

    5. Some of us will defend the informational commons (or any commons) from other’s abuse of it. Some will not.

    6. When you make a truth claim to others, or others make a truth claim to you, the person making the claim can, if he errs, biases, justifies, or deceives, violates reciprocity with the audience (what we call unethical), causes you to harm the informational commons as a consequence (by externality), and if he makes that claim in public, harms the informational commons as well, and therefore violates reciprocity in the commons (what we call immorality).

    7. P-Law provides a definition of truth, and the means of falsifying (testing) statements for truthfulness by tests of testifiable, consistency, operational possibility, correspondence, rationality, reciprocity, completeness, full accounting, and possibility of warranty, and possibility of restitution upon error or deceit.

    8. Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denialism, are all attempts at deception by:

    (a) claiming european self determination (sovereignty, reciprocity), tripartism (military, legal-commercial), and religious(family-faithful), mediated by law, and limiting us to markets, so that we preserve natural selection by demonstrated behavior, and devoting the proceeds to the production of commons, thereby maintaining the health,prosperity, and wealth of the people, and their competitive advantage is oppression, when all other peoples that did not do so were mired in poverty and suffering.

    (b) that the solution was communism, or socialism, that would end our natural selection, our prosperity, and our competitive advantage, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and victimization by nature – when all civilizations that have tried any form of equality have died.

    (c) that to bring about communism, socialism, and the reversal of evolutionary transcendence, it was necessary to undermine our civlization at every level.

    Monopoly statism to undermine our tripartism.

    Atheism to undermine our tripartism.

    Anti-militarism to undermine our tripartism.

    Anti-rule of law to undermine not only our tripartism but the means by which we resolved disputes between the classes.

    Marxism to undermine the markets and cooperation between the classes.

    Cultural Marxism to undermine our culture, values, myths, traditions, and arts.

    Feminism to undermine the family as the compromise between the genders given our different reproductive strategies and biological differences.

    Postmodernism to undermine our ability to use social pressure to force conformity into realism, naturalism, operationalism, reciprocity, truthful speech, and defense of the commons so that it was optimu for the production of high trust citizenry; and again,postmodernism to deny the existence of truth or truthful speech – when truthful speech is the primary reason for not only our high trust society but our ‘european means of sense-making’ that made empiricism our laws, democratic participation, our science, medicine, and technology, possible.

    Postmodernism to use language for any purpose by which to obtain political power – abandoning all need for consistency, correspondence, rationality and liability.

    Political correctness to undermine the truth of the substantial differences between our advanced, neotenic, genetically, informationally, normatively, culturally, traditionally, and institutional superior people, so that they can be conquered quietly and slowly.

    Using immigration to reverse our darwinian history.

    Using frailty in our law and democracy to capture our territory and institutions.

    Using the academy to indoctrinate two generations of marxist-postmodernist-feminist-HBD-denialist “Priests and Priestesses” to indoctrinate our children by manufacturing their ignorance, feminizing our males, and making obese both genders.

    That’s only part of what they’ve done. I’ve just run out of tolerance for listing their crimes.

    JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW

    If the informational, normative, traditional, and institutional commons is common property of a people, then the (((anti-western left))) is an organized crime syndicate invading and conquering from within, in violation of the Westphalian peace. And as such these people are prosecutable for war crimes, and we shall have our restitution.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-09 23:02:00 UTC

  • White law is slightly different: “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation

    White law is slightly different:

    “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation is preferable. But it is only preferable until it is not. When it is not then conquest and eradication are preferable to cooperation. “


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-06 16:53:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1247205689489063938

  • White law is slightly different: “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation

    White law is slightly different:

    “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation is preferable. But it is only preferable until it is not. When it is not then conquest and eradication are preferable to cooperation. “


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-06 12:52:00 UTC

  • EXAMPLE: REQUIREMENTS FOR VIOLATING P-LAW OF SPEECH —“Well, I’ve got a friend

    EXAMPLE: REQUIREMENTS FOR VIOLATING P-LAW OF SPEECH

    —“Well, I’ve got a friend who’s really into manufacturing custom soaps. Let’s say she understates her soap expenses in a public space, because she’s embarrassed.”—

    That’s In public, but not to the public, ad not about matters public. In other words no attempt to use the coercive powers of government nor to undermine the law limiting them, nor to pollute the informational commons, upon which the people depend.

    1) not regular speech, but political speech: in public to the public in matters public.

    2) I would expect lawyers to handle those in our existing court system, although I have recommended specialization of the court system, similar to the european court system where family, criminal, private, and public suits are separated.

    3) Lawyers and judges and court officials are just as prosecutable under P-law as anyone else. So I expect that to shake up the industry.

    Marxists, postmodernists, feminists, etc, go to jail.

    Silly people are just silly.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 16:19:00 UTC

  • Shaming for disapproval to avoid the argument, falsehood, irreciprocity, and fai

    Shaming for disapproval to avoid the argument, falsehood, irreciprocity, and failure of due diligence, is a demand for restitution, under test of reciprocity. The opposite is not.

    Learn the law. You will be better for it.

    Me: “Speak to the audience in a compromise grammar.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 15:29:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246822205083791361

    Reply addressees: @MillikanTamzin @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246816467791872001

  • I don’t care what you believe. I care only whether you display speak and act wit

    I don’t care what you believe. I care only whether you display speak and act with reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, including speaking the truth warrantied by due diligence against ignorance error bias and deceit.

    You don’t. I’m accusing you of false testimony.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 15:04:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246815869084274689

    Reply addressees: @MillikanTamzin @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246815300126945280

  • WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM: “THE LAW” “The Natural Law of European Peoples”: A full

    WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM: “THE LAW”

    “The Natural Law of European Peoples”: A fully commensurable system of measurement across all disciplines that tests for reciprocity in display, word (truth) and deed (action); the extension of the logic of the physical sciences (realism, naturalism, equilibration) to the psychological(individual) and social(group) sciences using economic terms (acquisition, cooperation, reciprocity); thereby completing the scientific method (falsification of all dimensions possible human cognition); and thereby completing the Aristotelian program; and thereby providing the explanation for the success of western civilization under that program: sovereignty, reciprocity, and truth – and the markets that result from their universal enforcement, and the evolutionary velocity (adaptation, innovation) that results from those markets.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 14:30:00 UTC

  • REVERSE ACCUSATIONS OF GSRRM GSRRM must be used to avoid an argument by substitu

    REVERSE ACCUSATIONS OF GSRRM

    GSRRM must be used to avoid an argument by substituting disapproval for truth. Shaming is necessary and warranted demand for restitution by suppression of the crime of avoiding an argument by substitution of disapproval.

    —“Doolittle: “do as I say not as I do”—Tamzin Millikan @MillikanTamzin

    Shaming for disapproval to avoid the argument, falsehood, irreciprocity, and failure of due diligence, is a demand for restitution, under test of reciprocity. The opposite is not.

    Learn the law. You will be better for it.

    Me: “Speak to the audience in a compromise grammar.”

    So:

    (a) I’m speaking to the audience in a compromise grammar (market).

    (b) You are disapproving without doing due diligence (assuming you understand and not asking why I’m doing so),(c) counter-signaling my shaming of your for failure of due diligence.

    Learn the law. End error. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 11:34:00 UTC

  • Propertarianism = Western civlization in scientific terms. A universal militia,

    Propertarianism = Western civlization in scientific terms.

    A universal militia, Rule of Law by Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Adjudicated by Jury, Producing markets in every aspect of life, producing the most adaptive and innovative civilization in human history.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-04 18:44:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246509075522863110

    Reply addressees: @af_clips @realThomBieler @NickJFuentes @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246457859161886720