Apr 21, 2020, 12:28 PM (worth repeating) So if (((the))) war on western-sensemaking: our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics. This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech. Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
Either Way We Have to Outlaw Social Construction by False Promise
Apr 21, 2020, 12:28 PM (worth repeating) So if (((the))) war on western-sensemaking: our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics. This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech. Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.
-
You say self consistent but you mean circular. instead, any exchange of rights m
You say self consistent but you mean circular. instead, any exchange of rights must be reciprocal – including possible. This is why only negative rights can exist.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-22 00:27:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263627624938602496
Reply addressees: @PaulDesmoParker @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263624685599592448
-
I made a necessary inescapable argument: You can invent whatever imaginary causa
I made a necessary inescapable argument: You can invent whatever imaginary causality you want, but as I said, rights must be brought into existence and envorced. And in response to your nonsense statement. Law has greater force than religion. Religions are resistance movements.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-22 00:26:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263627270566088704
Reply addressees: @PaulDesmoParker @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263626584260374529
-
Platonism: fairy tales for young adults. Fact: Rights must be brought into exist
Platonism: fairy tales for young adults. Fact: Rights must be brought into existence by applied violence. Property rights exists because men make them. Might makes all rights. As such rights are established and maintained only by those able to use organized violence to do so.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-22 00:06:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263622150172352513
Reply addressees: @PaulDesmoParker @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263619133586862081
-
BTW: I don’t do religion. I don’t do pseudoscience. I don’t do sophistry. And mo
BTW: I don’t do religion. I don’t do pseudoscience. I don’t do sophistry. And most of all, I don’t due denial.
I just do the formal science of law (dispute resolution).
Because people like you will make excuses for every possible criminal activity to justify hyperconsumption.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 22:22:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263595977652318209
Reply addressees: @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263595468178649090
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717 But again, truth is an alien intuition for the female, which is why you like the rest, will use preference to substitute and lie endlessly to justify that preferences are truths.
Otherwise we wouldn’t have university gut courses in postmodernism (lying) and feminism (denial).Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1263595468178649090
-
It’s murder plain and simple because it’s the intentional termination of a human
It’s murder plain and simple because it’s the intentional termination of a human life. Women have been murdering children since the dawn of time. Women have murdered more children than men have killed each other in wars. That women can do it in the womb early is the only novelty.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 22:18:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263595051143196672
Reply addressees: @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263593943205163011
-
Hence my work on natural law
Hence my work on natural law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 22:16:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263594605150236673
Reply addressees: @Maroeladalx10DB @TheRealFMCH @laurenboebert @austere1717
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263594454633508870
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Maroeladalx10DB @TheRealFMCH @laurenboebert @austere1717 And that is a technical way of agreeing with you.
That said, we made many errors in the 20th century not the least of which were blank slate, nature nurture, the malleability of mankind,equality of ability, individual agency, and natural morality. All of which are false.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1263594454633508870
-
The Natural Law Of The European Peoples
The Natural Law of the European Peoples
The group evolutionary strategy of the European peoples has remained constant for thousands of years – through the bronze, Mediterranean, Continental, Steel, Naval Colonial, and Post-war, periods. And that’s because our traditional law that reinforced that strategy remained constant independent of the various attempts at reorganizing rule. But despite this consistency, the west never had a bible – just a Canon; and that Canon was written in multiple frames, including scientific, legal, philosophical, normative, literary, and theological. Philosophy, theology, and tradition are just vehicles for perpetuating a group strategy in a grammar of wishes. Law is the result of what actually occurs – not what is wished for. Our Founding Fathers, after generations of the English civil wars, sought to reduce that canon to constitution. But they lacked the skill we developed in the 20th because of programming, the sciences, and the collapse of the philosophical program. They were successful despite those weaknesses as long as the heroic narrative of the revolution persisted, or what the founders said was dependent upon the moral teachings of the church. The failure of the church to reform in the face of Darwin and the sciences, the replacement of the church with the academy, the capture of the academy by the left, combined with Anti-westernism, under the guise of privilege, colonialism, and slavery provided the means of undermining that narrative. So we must complete the Greco-Roman-germanic-anglo-American research program and produce that bible in the form of a constitution such that no narrative can undermine it, without causing our retaliation. We need to create the white law – a rational, scientific, western competitor to Jewish law and Muslim sharia. A strict construction from our founding differences: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, heroism and excellence, family and commons, and the market for voluntary cooperation in all walks of life – that together produce the social-political and economic order most rapidly open to adaptation and innovation. We need a constitution and a law closed to interpretation open to innovation, but beyond which no man, private, public, or foreign may tread. Heroism and excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, Judge and Jury, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war. That is the secret to western civilization. Sovereignty – and its consequences. In this section we codify for the first time, The Natural Law of the European Peoples – not only to explain, and inform, but to prevent repetition of the dark ages past and present, and to provide for the European peoples that which others have codified: a logic and body of law beyond which none may tread by display word or deed – especially those in the military, state, government, treasury, and academy.
-
The Natural Law Of The European Peoples
The Natural Law of the European Peoples
The group evolutionary strategy of the European peoples has remained constant for thousands of years – through the bronze, Mediterranean, Continental, Steel, Naval Colonial, and Post-war, periods. And that’s because our traditional law that reinforced that strategy remained constant independent of the various attempts at reorganizing rule. But despite this consistency, the west never had a bible – just a Canon; and that Canon was written in multiple frames, including scientific, legal, philosophical, normative, literary, and theological. Philosophy, theology, and tradition are just vehicles for perpetuating a group strategy in a grammar of wishes. Law is the result of what actually occurs – not what is wished for. Our Founding Fathers, after generations of the English civil wars, sought to reduce that canon to constitution. But they lacked the skill we developed in the 20th because of programming, the sciences, and the collapse of the philosophical program. They were successful despite those weaknesses as long as the heroic narrative of the revolution persisted, or what the founders said was dependent upon the moral teachings of the church. The failure of the church to reform in the face of Darwin and the sciences, the replacement of the church with the academy, the capture of the academy by the left, combined with Anti-westernism, under the guise of privilege, colonialism, and slavery provided the means of undermining that narrative. So we must complete the Greco-Roman-germanic-anglo-American research program and produce that bible in the form of a constitution such that no narrative can undermine it, without causing our retaliation. We need to create the white law – a rational, scientific, western competitor to Jewish law and Muslim sharia. A strict construction from our founding differences: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, heroism and excellence, family and commons, and the market for voluntary cooperation in all walks of life – that together produce the social-political and economic order most rapidly open to adaptation and innovation. We need a constitution and a law closed to interpretation open to innovation, but beyond which no man, private, public, or foreign may tread. Heroism and excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, Judge and Jury, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war. That is the secret to western civilization. Sovereignty – and its consequences. In this section we codify for the first time, The Natural Law of the European Peoples – not only to explain, and inform, but to prevent repetition of the dark ages past and present, and to provide for the European peoples that which others have codified: a logic and body of law beyond which none may tread by display word or deed – especially those in the military, state, government, treasury, and academy.