Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • A Critical Principle

    Apr 3, 2020, 10:46 AM By Daniel Roland Anderson If you ever want to understand Natural Law, this is a critical principle. If you have not performed Due Diligence, and you serve as a conduit for falsehood, you are “lying” under the P definition of lying. So sometimes when we call you liar, we aren’t saying you are wicked. It could be you are simply . . . simple.

  • A Critical Principle

    Apr 3, 2020, 10:46 AM By Daniel Roland Anderson If you ever want to understand Natural Law, this is a critical principle. If you have not performed Due Diligence, and you serve as a conduit for falsehood, you are “lying” under the P definition of lying. So sometimes when we call you liar, we aren’t saying you are wicked. It could be you are simply . . . simple.

  • Being Wrong Versus Lying

    Apr 3, 2020, 11:33 AM

    —“I’m not sure making being wrong and lying the same is going to work. Intent is an incredibly powerful part of our system. It’s the only substantial difference between murder and justifiable homicide. Judging just action/outcome without judging the intent isn’t going to create a workable system”—Greg Hamilton

    That can’t be true, because our legal system already does it. It always has. All this does is extend it from commercial to political speech. Think of it this way: philosophy was invented as a competition to the law to give permission to lie.

    —“Well I’m missing something because it appears you are saying being wrong is lying. … That without intent to deceive to are as guilty as if you had intent. “—Greg Hamilton

    Being wrong, or failing due diligence? You can perform due diligence and still be wrong without fault. You cannot avoid due diligence and still be wrong without fault. This is why the law distinguishes between Restitution, escalating to Punishment, and escalating to Prevention. Means motive and opportunity. We cannot know intent. We can however know due diligence. Which is how we test your truth or lie in law.

  • Being Wrong Versus Lying

    Apr 3, 2020, 11:33 AM

    —“I’m not sure making being wrong and lying the same is going to work. Intent is an incredibly powerful part of our system. It’s the only substantial difference between murder and justifiable homicide. Judging just action/outcome without judging the intent isn’t going to create a workable system”—Greg Hamilton

    That can’t be true, because our legal system already does it. It always has. All this does is extend it from commercial to political speech. Think of it this way: philosophy was invented as a competition to the law to give permission to lie.

    —“Well I’m missing something because it appears you are saying being wrong is lying. … That without intent to deceive to are as guilty as if you had intent. “—Greg Hamilton

    Being wrong, or failing due diligence? You can perform due diligence and still be wrong without fault. You cannot avoid due diligence and still be wrong without fault. This is why the law distinguishes between Restitution, escalating to Punishment, and escalating to Prevention. Means motive and opportunity. We cannot know intent. We can however know due diligence. Which is how we test your truth or lie in law.

  • The Ten Canonical Principles in The Natural Law of Sovereigns.

    Apr 3, 2020, 2:23 PM

    1. Commensurability: Definitions by Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalization
    2. Truth: Satisfaction of demand for infallibility.
    3. Testimony: Due diligence against perceivable dimensions.
    4. Reciprocity: Due diligence against incentive to retaliate.
    5. Property In Toto: Measurements of Demonstrated intersets
    6. Compatibilism: Gender and class division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and cooperation.
    7. Trifunctionalism: Three possible means of coercion, produces three competing specializations of elites.
    8. Perfect Government: rule of law, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses for regions, classes, genders, with one family one vote – adapting to authority under threat, markets under peace, and redistribution during windfalls.
    9. Transcendence: Evolutionary necessity ‘to become the red queen’ – we may never stop nor never rest.
    10. Western Group Evolutionary strategy is “OODA” meaning technology, maneuver and initiative. This strategy is created by excellence and beauty, heroism and duty, truth and oath, sovereignty and reciprocity, rule of law and jury, and markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war – while suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, and devoting the surpluses to the production of commons, and the multiples for all that result.

    That’s the core of P. The rest is application.

  • The Ten Canonical Principles in The Natural Law of Sovereigns.

    Apr 3, 2020, 2:23 PM

    1. Commensurability: Definitions by Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalization
    2. Truth: Satisfaction of demand for infallibility.
    3. Testimony: Due diligence against perceivable dimensions.
    4. Reciprocity: Due diligence against incentive to retaliate.
    5. Property In Toto: Measurements of Demonstrated intersets
    6. Compatibilism: Gender and class division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and cooperation.
    7. Trifunctionalism: Three possible means of coercion, produces three competing specializations of elites.
    8. Perfect Government: rule of law, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses for regions, classes, genders, with one family one vote – adapting to authority under threat, markets under peace, and redistribution during windfalls.
    9. Transcendence: Evolutionary necessity ‘to become the red queen’ – we may never stop nor never rest.
    10. Western Group Evolutionary strategy is “OODA” meaning technology, maneuver and initiative. This strategy is created by excellence and beauty, heroism and duty, truth and oath, sovereignty and reciprocity, rule of law and jury, and markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war – while suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, and devoting the surpluses to the production of commons, and the multiples for all that result.

    That’s the core of P. The rest is application.

  • Reverse Accusations of Gsrrm

    Apr 5, 2020, 11:34 AM GSRRM must be used to avoid an argument by substituting disapproval for truth. Shaming is necessary and warranted demand for restitution by suppression of the crime of avoiding an argument by substitution of disapproval.

    —“Doolittle: “do as I say not as I do”—Tamzin Millikan @MillikanTamzin

    Shaming for disapproval to avoid the argument, falsehood, irreciprocity, and failure of due diligence, is a demand for restitution, under test of reciprocity. The opposite is not. Learn the law. You will be better for it. Me: “Speak to the audience in a compromise grammar.” So: (a) I’m speaking to the audience in a compromise grammar (market). (b) You are disapproving without doing due diligence (assuming you understand and not asking why I’m doing so),(c) counter-signaling my shaming of your for failure of due diligence. Learn the law. End error.

  • Reverse Accusations of Gsrrm

    Apr 5, 2020, 11:34 AM GSRRM must be used to avoid an argument by substituting disapproval for truth. Shaming is necessary and warranted demand for restitution by suppression of the crime of avoiding an argument by substitution of disapproval.

    —“Doolittle: “do as I say not as I do”—Tamzin Millikan @MillikanTamzin

    Shaming for disapproval to avoid the argument, falsehood, irreciprocity, and failure of due diligence, is a demand for restitution, under test of reciprocity. The opposite is not. Learn the law. You will be better for it. Me: “Speak to the audience in a compromise grammar.” So: (a) I’m speaking to the audience in a compromise grammar (market). (b) You are disapproving without doing due diligence (assuming you understand and not asking why I’m doing so),(c) counter-signaling my shaming of your for failure of due diligence. Learn the law. End error.

  • The Hierarchy of Possibilities Prevents Error

    Apr 16, 2020, 10:22 AM By Lucas Cort SOVEREIGNTY – DOMINANT MALE The male strategy creates sovereignty IN FACT – violence and Law – establishment of action, preservation and insurance between insurers. FREEDOM – ALL Those Sovereigns then grant PERMISSION to those of lesser insurance or specializations in the division of labour to act within the limits of that permission(markets) what we call FREEDOM. If FREEDOM is used as the starting point without understanding the necessity for sovereignty that makes freedom possible, then men will not pay the cost of defending the sovereigns who create freedom. LIBERTY – ASCENDANT MALE The ascendant male navigates the permissible freedom with LIBERTY(agency, autonomy). If LIBERTY is used the starting point without understanding the necessity for the larger structures of permission and insurance to uphold that permission, the idea of liberty (autonomy) can undermine the very thing that allows it to survive through entitlement (false priors) and possible negative externalities that undermine group cohesion (think libertarianism – baiting into hazard, etc). REDISTRIBUTION – FEMALE This can be divided further into the female strategy, which has the primarily focus on empathy using social transactions to create redistribution within the group. If REDISTRIBUTION is used as the starting point, first entitlement devoid merit, then hyper consumption, and redistribution undermine the value of the structure that allows it to navigate, just as the ascendant male.

  • The Hierarchy of Possibilities Prevents Error

    Apr 16, 2020, 10:22 AM By Lucas Cort SOVEREIGNTY – DOMINANT MALE The male strategy creates sovereignty IN FACT – violence and Law – establishment of action, preservation and insurance between insurers. FREEDOM – ALL Those Sovereigns then grant PERMISSION to those of lesser insurance or specializations in the division of labour to act within the limits of that permission(markets) what we call FREEDOM. If FREEDOM is used as the starting point without understanding the necessity for sovereignty that makes freedom possible, then men will not pay the cost of defending the sovereigns who create freedom. LIBERTY – ASCENDANT MALE The ascendant male navigates the permissible freedom with LIBERTY(agency, autonomy). If LIBERTY is used the starting point without understanding the necessity for the larger structures of permission and insurance to uphold that permission, the idea of liberty (autonomy) can undermine the very thing that allows it to survive through entitlement (false priors) and possible negative externalities that undermine group cohesion (think libertarianism – baiting into hazard, etc). REDISTRIBUTION – FEMALE This can be divided further into the female strategy, which has the primarily focus on empathy using social transactions to create redistribution within the group. If REDISTRIBUTION is used as the starting point, first entitlement devoid merit, then hyper consumption, and redistribution undermine the value of the structure that allows it to navigate, just as the ascendant male.