How Can a Falsehood Be Reciprocal? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/how-can-a-falsehood-be-reciprocal/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 21:19:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266116884715487233
How Can a Falsehood Be Reciprocal? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/how-can-a-falsehood-be-reciprocal/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 21:19:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266116884715487233
Mar 19, 2020, 3:46 PM 1) So the restoration of reciprocity between the genders is what you are objecting to? 2) The equal suppression of the female means of deceit and undermining so that it equals the male suppression of deceit and undermining is irreciprocal? 3) The granting of women a separate and equal political house is irreciprocal? 4) Ending community property is irreciprocal? 5) Researching artificial wombs so that males are no longer dependent upon females for reproduction is irreciprocal? 6) What civilization is more feminine than the western, and less coercive to women and the feminine than the western? (a) historically women were almost entirely uneducated, notorious gossips, shrills, and psychotics, consider the source of all evil, and it was the victorians that works to reverse that image and elevate women. (a) women were ‘convinced’ is simply counter to the historical evidence. Women wanted the vote. (b) women were liberated by men’s industrialization. (c) women displaced men in clerical and service work (easy work). (d) women spend 70% of combined income and consume 70% of government resources, while only men over 30 are net contributors to the economy. (e) women are responsible for backing and funding and advocating every major left wing pseudoscientific movement. (f) women are responsible for the continuous voting of the left, funding the left universities. HOW CAN A FALSEHOOD BE RECIPROCAL?
Mar 19, 2020, 3:46 PM 1) So the restoration of reciprocity between the genders is what you are objecting to? 2) The equal suppression of the female means of deceit and undermining so that it equals the male suppression of deceit and undermining is irreciprocal? 3) The granting of women a separate and equal political house is irreciprocal? 4) Ending community property is irreciprocal? 5) Researching artificial wombs so that males are no longer dependent upon females for reproduction is irreciprocal? 6) What civilization is more feminine than the western, and less coercive to women and the feminine than the western? (a) historically women were almost entirely uneducated, notorious gossips, shrills, and psychotics, consider the source of all evil, and it was the victorians that works to reverse that image and elevate women. (a) women were ‘convinced’ is simply counter to the historical evidence. Women wanted the vote. (b) women were liberated by men’s industrialization. (c) women displaced men in clerical and service work (easy work). (d) women spend 70% of combined income and consume 70% of government resources, while only men over 30 are net contributors to the economy. (e) women are responsible for backing and funding and advocating every major left wing pseudoscientific movement. (f) women are responsible for the continuous voting of the left, funding the left universities. HOW CAN A FALSEHOOD BE RECIPROCAL?
But What About Everything Other than Moral Reasoning? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/but-what-about-everything-other-than-moral-reasoning/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 21:06:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266113765453561858
Mar 20, 2020, 10:28 AM BUT WHAT ABOUT EVERYTHING OTHER THAN MORAL REASONING?
—“Brandon, Why is applied-P simple?”—CD —“P’s not hard cause it asks one thing: reciprocity. It’s just hard for people to spot when it’s not interpersonal. Don’t cheat people with your words; warranty your actions… What’s hard?”— Brandon Hayes
So moral-reasoning in P is not hard. But what about the Grammars, Testimonial Truth, Operational Language, Strictly Constructed Laws, and the Abrahamic Method of Deceit?
Mar 20, 2020, 10:28 AM BUT WHAT ABOUT EVERYTHING OTHER THAN MORAL REASONING?
—“Brandon, Why is applied-P simple?”—CD —“P’s not hard cause it asks one thing: reciprocity. It’s just hard for people to spot when it’s not interpersonal. Don’t cheat people with your words; warranty your actions… What’s hard?”— Brandon Hayes
So moral-reasoning in P is not hard. But what about the Grammars, Testimonial Truth, Operational Language, Strictly Constructed Laws, and the Abrahamic Method of Deceit?
A Full Answer of Demonstrated Interests https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/a-full-answer-of-demonstrated-interests/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 20:37:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266106229178368001
Mar 22, 2020, 11:03 AM It is hard to start with first principles. We always want to narrow the domain set of our question rather than start from first principles. The first principle is time. We are in a continuous competition with time, and our inventory of resources, because of the cost of persisting our existence. Cooperation saves time. we have the same input as we did 50k ypb. The ability to cooperate creates possibility of obtaining returns on time. Cooperation provides caloric returns on time. But all opportunities for cooperation are in competition with others’ wants and opportunities, including the opportunity to prey and parasite upon one another. When people come together in proximity they (a) create opportunities for a division of labor (b) increase choice of goods services and information by division of labor (c) decrease opportunity costs of exchange within that division (d) increase opportunity and incentive for parasitism and predation, (e) create institutions to decrease transaction costs – including risk.
|INTERESTS| Unknown (potential) utility > Known (potential) Utility, Opportunity (potential interest), Demonstrated Interest, Possession, Property, Right, and Title (Proxy).
Known (potential) Utility …()
Opportunity: any interest that Man my wish to acquire through his investment that has not yet been invested in by others.
Demonstrated Interest: (homesteading)
Possession: Possession is a Fact. Possessions are Personally insured. Consisting of that which one has acted to prevent others from consumption or use.
Property: Property is a Norm. Property is collectively insured. Consisting of that which evolves as general rules of non-imposition between people with similar kinship, interests, or interdependence. Property is that which is insured against non-imposition by a third party organization.
Property Rights: Property Rights are dependent upon the existence of an institution that acts as the insurer of last resort, and enforces rights and obligations in matters of disputes.
Title …..(title proxy for possession)
THE FOUNDATIONS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-314/ MARKETS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/05/25/why-and-how-do-free-markets-work/ THE LAW (Halfway down the page, Part 999 – The Law, Property https://propertarianinstitute.com/government-and-law/
Mar 22, 2020, 11:03 AM It is hard to start with first principles. We always want to narrow the domain set of our question rather than start from first principles. The first principle is time. We are in a continuous competition with time, and our inventory of resources, because of the cost of persisting our existence. Cooperation saves time. we have the same input as we did 50k ypb. The ability to cooperate creates possibility of obtaining returns on time. Cooperation provides caloric returns on time. But all opportunities for cooperation are in competition with others’ wants and opportunities, including the opportunity to prey and parasite upon one another. When people come together in proximity they (a) create opportunities for a division of labor (b) increase choice of goods services and information by division of labor (c) decrease opportunity costs of exchange within that division (d) increase opportunity and incentive for parasitism and predation, (e) create institutions to decrease transaction costs – including risk.
|INTERESTS| Unknown (potential) utility > Known (potential) Utility, Opportunity (potential interest), Demonstrated Interest, Possession, Property, Right, and Title (Proxy).
Known (potential) Utility …()
Opportunity: any interest that Man my wish to acquire through his investment that has not yet been invested in by others.
Demonstrated Interest: (homesteading)
Possession: Possession is a Fact. Possessions are Personally insured. Consisting of that which one has acted to prevent others from consumption or use.
Property: Property is a Norm. Property is collectively insured. Consisting of that which evolves as general rules of non-imposition between people with similar kinship, interests, or interdependence. Property is that which is insured against non-imposition by a third party organization.
Property Rights: Property Rights are dependent upon the existence of an institution that acts as the insurer of last resort, and enforces rights and obligations in matters of disputes.
Title …..(title proxy for possession)
THE FOUNDATIONS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-314/ MARKETS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/05/25/why-and-how-do-free-markets-work/ THE LAW (Halfway down the page, Part 999 – The Law, Property https://propertarianinstitute.com/government-and-law/
Definition: Demonstrated Interests https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/definition-demonstrated-interests/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 20:32:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266104959663247367