Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Rights don’t exist without numbers.

    Mar 13, 2020, 12:58 PM Rights don’t exist without numbers. Therefore maintain the numbers necessary to create and maintain rights. All rights must be reciprocal or cannot be rights, and are but claims on others to tolerate your irreciprocity and prevent their retaliation against your irreciprocity.

    —“My rights exist completely apart from any “numbers” or your opinion or agreement. Inherent human right to life, privacy and property. No amount of numbers has the right to violate that for me. I don’t have the right to violate those for you.”— A Noob

    You’re demanding behavior from others. To construct a right you must create either a normative or institutional condition under which you have others to appeal to, to enforce it. Natural rights are a desire. They must be brought into existence through production by men. So your desire for rights, or demand for rights, does not mean they exist, any more than a communist’s desire for rights of equidistribution exist. Rights are made by force of men, in normative or institutional form. Moral rights are limited to natural rights: reciprocity. Period. The technique employed in libertarianism presumes that the willingness of the female is transferrable to the male. But it doesn’t. females have intrinsic sexual and reproductive value. Men do not. Men must create reciprocal defense to have value. This is as always the foundational error of all jewish libertarian (Rothbardian) thought: the pretense of the female.

  • But Can We Do It?

    Mar 14, 2020, 10:43 AM I tend to stick to definitions, incentives, the law of reciprocity and universal applicability, but this group has put out three statements about women’s pre-conscious behaviors over the past few days that are explanatory, insightful, and terrifying. The question is, can we state those behaviors under the definition of “Mankind”? Yes, I know so. Can we regulate against them in the law? I think so. Can we educate women to control them? I don’t know. And the reason I don’t know is the female bias we seek to train, evolved specifically to resist training. In case that isn’t clear, if you can’t be trained then you aren’t capable of soveriegnty under the natural law. And that has vast and dangerous consequences for ‘equal standing’ and ‘equal application’.

  • But Can We Do It?

    Mar 14, 2020, 10:43 AM I tend to stick to definitions, incentives, the law of reciprocity and universal applicability, but this group has put out three statements about women’s pre-conscious behaviors over the past few days that are explanatory, insightful, and terrifying. The question is, can we state those behaviors under the definition of “Mankind”? Yes, I know so. Can we regulate against them in the law? I think so. Can we educate women to control them? I don’t know. And the reason I don’t know is the female bias we seek to train, evolved specifically to resist training. In case that isn’t clear, if you can’t be trained then you aren’t capable of soveriegnty under the natural law. And that has vast and dangerous consequences for ‘equal standing’ and ‘equal application’.

  • That’s the deal.

    Mar 14, 2020, 11:22 AM

    Your body, your children, my capital, my polity. That’s the deal. No More Lies

  • That’s the deal.

    Mar 14, 2020, 11:22 AM

    Your body, your children, my capital, my polity. That’s the deal. No More Lies

  • Applied P-Law

    Mar 14, 2020, 7:23 PM P-law argues against shaming and moralizing as substitute for or avoidance of argument, not as disincentive for irreciprocity (immorality). I don’t know why visiting Thai Hookers is irreciprocal with the in group. I think it puts pressure on one’s virtue signaling – meaning worthiness for imitation – because it’s a signal of low sexual social economic market value to some, but for most I think it’s just reducing the cost of sex by reducing it to purely transactional. Hookers are expensive per transaction but there are no or few external costs. Relationships have high external costs. They may have high external rewards. But only if those rewards are of subjective value to you. Long and short of it is that GSRRM is the correct response to avoiding an argument, and for suppressing virtue signaling, but that’s all. I don’t know the context but it sounds like crossing signals between different sexual value markets.

  • Applied P-Law

    Mar 14, 2020, 7:23 PM P-law argues against shaming and moralizing as substitute for or avoidance of argument, not as disincentive for irreciprocity (immorality). I don’t know why visiting Thai Hookers is irreciprocal with the in group. I think it puts pressure on one’s virtue signaling – meaning worthiness for imitation – because it’s a signal of low sexual social economic market value to some, but for most I think it’s just reducing the cost of sex by reducing it to purely transactional. Hookers are expensive per transaction but there are no or few external costs. Relationships have high external costs. They may have high external rewards. But only if those rewards are of subjective value to you. Long and short of it is that GSRRM is the correct response to avoiding an argument, and for suppressing virtue signaling, but that’s all. I don’t know the context but it sounds like crossing signals between different sexual value markets.

  • Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms

    Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/ten-commandments-in-p-law-terms/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 00:46:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266169025488453632

  • Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms

    Mar 14, 2020, 8:02 PM (In response to James Dmitro Makienko and John Mark.) 1 – God/Nature has given us the many laws of nature, the one natural law: reciprocity, and the one choice: transcendence into gods ourselves by those laws, or the end of our existence for failing. 2 – You shall not use reciprocity falsely, or criticize reciprocity, and spread irreciprocity – this is to criticize god, god’s law, and doom mankind to failure of transcendence. 4 – You must return your parent’s investment in you with reciprocity of obedience, respect, and care. 5 – You shalt not commit murder – reciprocity of life cannot be restored, reciprocity of revenge cannot be unmade, and reciprocity in trust forever lost. 6 – You shalt not commit adultery – reciprocity of the marriage promise cannot be restored. 7 – You shalt not steal – reciprocity of goods may be restored, but reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 8 – You shalt not lie – reciprocity of deceit may be restored, reciprocity of harm may not be, and reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 9 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s wife or husband – lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of a marriage. 10 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s property, lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of property. 3 – One day a week you shall spend contemplating your reciprocity irreciprocity, to past, present and future kin and kith, and seek means of restitution. (something along those lines. should be extended to include male violence rape, female gossip, undermining. Not the shift of the third commandment to tenth place.)

  • Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms

    Mar 14, 2020, 8:02 PM (In response to James Dmitro Makienko and John Mark.) 1 – God/Nature has given us the many laws of nature, the one natural law: reciprocity, and the one choice: transcendence into gods ourselves by those laws, or the end of our existence for failing. 2 – You shall not use reciprocity falsely, or criticize reciprocity, and spread irreciprocity – this is to criticize god, god’s law, and doom mankind to failure of transcendence. 4 – You must return your parent’s investment in you with reciprocity of obedience, respect, and care. 5 – You shalt not commit murder – reciprocity of life cannot be restored, reciprocity of revenge cannot be unmade, and reciprocity in trust forever lost. 6 – You shalt not commit adultery – reciprocity of the marriage promise cannot be restored. 7 – You shalt not steal – reciprocity of goods may be restored, but reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 8 – You shalt not lie – reciprocity of deceit may be restored, reciprocity of harm may not be, and reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 9 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s wife or husband – lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of a marriage. 10 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s property, lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of property. 3 – One day a week you shall spend contemplating your reciprocity irreciprocity, to past, present and future kin and kith, and seek means of restitution. (something along those lines. should be extended to include male violence rape, female gossip, undermining. Not the shift of the third commandment to tenth place.)