Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • The Etymology of “Court” From the notion of “surroundings of a sovereign in his

    The Etymology of “Court”
    From the notion of “surroundings of a sovereign in his regal state” (c. 1200) comes the legal meaning “a tribunal for judicial investigation” (c. 1300, early assemblies for justice were overseen by the sovereign personally), also “hall or chamber where justice is administered” (c. 1300). As an adjective, “pertaining to a court,” late 13c.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 23:45:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670216167724662784

  • Q: Curt: How did the left manage to escape the US Constitution in the first plac

    Q: Curt: How did the left manage to escape the US Constitution in the first place?”

    In simple terms: failing to solve free *truthful* speech and the consequences of failing to do so.

    List:
    – Failing to articulate the natural law, common law, and concurrency in the declaration…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-16 20:11:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669799786013138964

    Reply addressees: @tryanph

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669791606671831040

  • Q: Curt: How did the left manage to escape the US Constitution in the first plac

    Q: Curt: How did the left manage to escape the US Constitution in the first place?”

    In simple terms: failing to solve free *truthful* speech and the consequences of failing to do so.

    List:
    – Failing to articulate the natural law, common law, and concurrency in the declaration and constitution by assuming it, and not including Blackstone’s argument explicitly.
    – Failing to articulate the european group evolutionary strategy of maximizing individual responsibility thereby suppression the existence of and need for authority, and thereby creating freedom and liberty.
    – The Failure to solve the problem of truthful reciprocal speech rather than free speech. Failure to anticipate the ability to scale female antisocial behavior in education, media, and politics by maintaining common law prohibitions on it.
    – The failure to preserve libel and slander, interference in occupation, interference in business, interference in marriage.
    – The Failure to maintain common law prohibitions on limiting conflict to voluntary markets, reciprocal debate, court and duel, and the prohibition on breaking the kings (common law) peace.
    – The problem of Christianity as a convenient deception using female antisocial behavior and opening the door for more false speech.
    – The Failure to grasp that a religion must merely promote a false promise of freedom from any of the four sets of laws of the universe.
    – The failure to recognize the marxist pseudoscientific sequence as the reformation of Judaism and Christianity as a new hostile religion exploiting female antisocial behavior, undermining natural, common, concurrent law.
    – The failure (long-standing) to include baiting into hazard as a crime even more serious than fraud (the reason for repeated Jewish persecutions) and, therefore the failure to prosecute the marxist sequence like all leftism as baiting into hazard.
    – The Failure to require judicial ascent for legislation to pass.
    – The Failure to prevent lawfare by punishing those pursuing legal activism for attempts to undermine the constitution.
    – The Failure to suppress and outlaw the marxist sequence as seditious and treason against the natural common concurrent law.
    – The Failure to maintain the requirement for demonstrated responsibility (commercial producing property) for political participation.
    – The Failure to preserve rule of law by the most egregious violation of it with the civil rights law legalizing reverse racism, and ending necessary integration required for the preservation of natural, common, concurrent law.
    – The failure of all of the above by the introgression of women into politics and economy before educating and preventing these means of antisocial, antipolitical behavior.

    While those are the major points, they’re just the tip of the iceberg so to speak.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-16 20:11:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669799785765675022

  • You are mistaken. There is a difference between limiting the monarchies to the p

    You are mistaken. There is a difference between limiting the monarchies to the preservation of rule of law by natural law, as I’ve stated, and the end of monarchies giving license to the failed projecs of ‘liberalism’, ‘fascism’, and ‘communism’: new political religions. Read…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-16 14:58:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669721167924543490

    Reply addressees: @uwemudofia10 @Nefertiiti

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669715961853739011

  • You are mistaken. There is a difference between limiting the monarchies to the p

    You are mistaken. There is a difference between limiting the monarchies to the preservation of rule of law by natural law, as I’ve stated, and the end of monarchies giving license to the failed projecs of ‘liberalism’, ‘fascism’, and ‘communism’: new political religions. Read Hoppe: “Democracy the god that failed”.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-16 14:58:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669721167836356614

  • We are sworn to protect the constitution of the united states, not the governmen

    We are sworn to protect the constitution of the united states, not the government – and that’s for a very good reason. The constitution *IS* our means of decidability. Meaning the constitution rules. Period. And the constitution is the product of the people for the people, and the government ostensibly works for us – although that’s come to an end outside of the military, and the right side of the court.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-15 21:58:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669464395838115844

  • Property rights are common property silly

    Property rights are common property silly.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-14 19:59:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669072031487340545

    Reply addressees: @WhereAmIWrong @TheAutistocrat @Paulp6363

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669069948516270084

  • THE MONARCHY IS AS IMPORTANT AS RULE OF LAW Yes, I am an absolutely devoted mona

    THE MONARCHY IS AS IMPORTANT AS RULE OF LAW
    Yes, I am an absolutely devoted monarchist. Not only because of my heritage, but because I have a deep understanding that the monarchy is as important an institution – especially in it’s english form – necessary for the preservation of… https://twitter.com/PJ_Yukon/status/1668373992699207681


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-14 15:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669006158110105600

  • 1. Interesting. Wouldn’t have anticipated that reading. Here: “The people prohib

    1. Interesting. Wouldn’t have anticipated that reading.
    Here: “The people prohibit any and all claims of and uses of authority and instead constrain decisions to decidability upon which they can agree.”
    Ergo we are all bound by the laws of nature and the customary laws we have discovered in nature, and conflicts can be decided by applying those laws of nature, by a jury of peers, whether in thang (senate, parliament) or court. Note that this applied to sovereigns (warrior aristocracy) and over time we have attempted to extend western ethics to classes of individuals previously (and perhaps still) unable to participate in decidability, and are still limited to statements of preference.

    2. Prohibition is a noun that means the act of forbidding or preventing something by law or authority.
    Here are some examples of how to use prohibition in a sentence:
    The prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s led to the rise of illegal speakeasies and bootlegging.
    Many people oppose the prohibition of marijuana, arguing that it has medical benefits and is less harmful than other drugs.
    The government imposed a prohibition on the import of certain goods from the neighboring country.
    She faced a prohibition from driving for six months after she was caught speeding.
    The school has a strict prohibition on cheating and plagiarism.

    Reply addressees: @astrotrad @Nefertiiti


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-14 11:27:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668943353713442818

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668938828126486529

  • LAW IS A SCIENCE, AND THE MARXIST, POMO, FEMINIST, WOKE SEQUENCE IS JUST A PSEUD

    LAW IS A SCIENCE, AND THE MARXIST, POMO, FEMINIST, WOKE SEQUENCE IS JUST A PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC FRAUD: DYSGENIC DEVOLUTIONARY PARASITISM.

    –“Modern American jurisprudential studies began when the dean of Harvard University Law School, Christopher Columbus Langdell, published the first modern law school casebook, SELECTION OF CASES ON THE LAW OF CONTRACTS, in 1871.

    Langdell’s casebook ushered in the modern era because it offered a new methodology and pedagogy for law study that was nothing mor e tha n a n expression of confidence in the scientific method.

    He declared in the preface to his Contracts casebook: “It is indispensable to establish at least two things, first that law is a science; secondly that all the available materials of that science are contained in the printed books.”

    In keeping with the spirit of Enlightenment, Langdell had confidence in the power of science and reason to uncover universal truths.”

    — Minda, G. (1995). Origins of Modern Jurisprudence. In Postmodern Legal Movements: Law and Jurisprudence At Century’s End (pp. 13–23). NYU Press. https://t.co/woqNgppA24


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-13 17:43:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668675512003117057