Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

VACCINES: “NO RICHARD, THAT’S NOT RIGHT.”
Instead, Restore Rule of Law, Truthful Testimony, and Juridical Defense to the Court of Public Opinion.
RE: https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1670667160971247617

Richard @RichardHanania;

You’re missing the point.
There were no terms under which we should have…

VACCINES: “NO RICHARD, THAT’S NOT RIGHT.”
Instead, Restore Rule of Law, Truthful Testimony, and Juridical Defense to the Court of Public Opinion.
RE: https://t.co/9lrTxhUBpz

Richard @RichardHanania;

You’re missing the point.
There were no terms under which we should have canceled people, especially in their jobs, for not taking the medication (it’s a therapy, not a vaccine). That’s coercion without juridical defense. And proxying the state through private industry is a violation of due process AND circumvention of juridical defense.

That’s the problem.

Y’all converted an issue that should have remained scientific (and could have) and instead created a moral and then political issue out of it. So just as the left rejects race differences, sex differences and IQ differences etc, the right will do the equivalent because y’all violated the most sacred of the right’s principles: self-determination and truth before face. And no, the illness was not severe enough for that forced vaccination, and no, the general public wasn’t threatened as much as the ‘unclean people, unfit people, comorbid people, and their caretakers and medical providers.

I can understand and test the science’ as well as anyone. And there isn’t that much of it that substantive enough to test. So, it’s not that hard. The number of nonsense papers, claims, headlines, and speeches, on both sides, was absurd. The CDC and WHO were unprepared because they’ve followed tradition and privatized the political institution for personal career gain rather than practicing for wargames as does the military; the academy saw funding opportunities and published trash on small data sets; and the politicals sedated the neurotic (leftist, female) faction with false promises, including the utility of masks, rather than just sticking with the truth:

–“We don’t know. We’re doing the best we can. We have mobilized the entirety of american and world medical care to do our best. If you want to protect yourself, get this shot, it’s not sufficiently tested against long-term effects; it’s not a preventative vaccine; it’s just a therapy that will seriously diminish your symptoms and reduce your risk of death. If not, then you’re carrying the risk. And if enough of you carry the risk and get ill, you will overwhelm the medical system that has failed to maintain domestic strategic supply reserves and production, and you will have a greater chance of dying. It’s your choice. And there is nothing anyone can do about it.”–

That’s what should have been said. That would have given most people who led unclean lives to take the shot. And those of us who lead clean lives not to.

What’s a clean life? We don’t interact with many people interpersonally; if we do, it’s with other high-agency, high-discipline, equally fastidious people.

Y’all violating the Western first principle of “Truth before face, regardless of cost.” When truth consists of what is testifiable by you – and not hearsay.

No more lies – even lies of convenience and conviction.

That’s the lesson y’all should take from this episode.

And we’ll probably have to legislate such lessons to prevent you and yours from doing it ever again. And I’m sure we’ll eventually push it through – as one of the many reasons to prevent governments from lying, denying, and wishful thinking, limiting those speaking in public, to the public in matters public, to TESTIFIABLE SPEECH.

We must restore juridical defense, rule of law, truthful testimony, punishment for perjury, and liability for defamation, or harm to the commons, to the court of public opinion.

And that’s what our organization is working to achieve.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation