THE DECEPTION OF MARXISM VS CAPITALISM
Marxism <> Capitalism was a deception. The question is only Rule of Law <> Discretion. If we have rule of law then we must cooperate. If we cooperate then we will compromise. If we compromise we will have redistribution. The price of redistribution will be one-child-reproduction.
RULE OF LAW <> DISCRETIONARY RULE
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 11:08:00 UTC
CRIME AND PUNISHMENT (Sketching this still)
The strategy of graceful and incremental failure.
I have been working on ‘punishment’ for quite a while, and have come to the conclusion – obvious in retrospect – that imprisonment is as counter productive as is mixed mass education, and forcible social integration, and that enserfdom and enslavement in self governing work-on-commons camps, farming camps, training camps, where individuals are required to self-maintain, or self improve are better than imprisonment, which is merely expensive, destructive to the mind, and makes people worse than they were when they went in.
In other words, I do not see punishment beneficial as much as insulating the markets from these people, and providing a society with normative regulations more suited to their abilities.
It seems that for men in particular, isolation, submission, and repetition do not teach them how to negotiate a position in a dominance hierarchy by cooperation and merit, but the more aggressive the male the worse consequence this has for him. And as the military has shown for thousands of years, the most dangerous men can be tamed by other dangerous men and find a place in a hierarchy where they can succeed.
It seems like simple infantry units comprised exclusively of ‘troubled males’ who do nothing more than small arms and patrols should once again be used as a method of ‘rescuing’ those men who have lacked discipline.
It seems that there is vast work in the commons that can be conducted, and that we now possess the technology to equip our ‘serfs of the commons’ such that they either can be tagged and found, or tagged, shocked and found (without resorting to exploding collars so to speak.)
It seems that as long as a court exists for the camp members, and that ‘video record is everywhere and everywhen’ that ‘outside intervention’ is always possible, and inside appeal to the court of their peers is always possible.
It seems that as in all things, we can create an internal industry out of reformers out of practical market demand, rather than an external industry out of reforming – unsuccessfully.
It means that camp-governance can be tribal (by kin). And it might mean that camp life can become voluntary: in that if a man chooses that camp ‘society’ is preferable, that he can stay in it, where he may be valued whereas outside of it he would not be.
It means that if a ‘hanging’ is necessary, that it will be performed by their peers rather than by superiors in the external market.
It seems that no electronic communication. No personal visits. Only written communications (on paper) should be permitted since this perpetuates prior anchors and perpetuates crimes.
It seems that the teaching of mindfulness is probably the most important skill we should work on, since it is lack of mindfulness that leads to the majority of criminal activity.
In other words, we should provide as much incentive to self maintain, and stay inside as possible, and to let communities form that serve the interests of either reforming or exterminating the individuals.
|| Beast > Barbarian > Slave > Serf > Freeman > Citizen > Peer > Sovereign > Demigod > God
|| A hostage someone waiting for ransom > a prisoner is someone waiting for justice > indentured servant someone who is working off a debt to society (work in commons) > a serf someone generally self regulating within limits but isolated from market society > A slave someone who cannot self regulate and must be regulated and isolated from the market society > Death Row: someone who must be removed from all societies.
|| Grandmother(Wisdom/Limit) < Woman (Empathy/Train) < Maiden(expressions/search) < Girl (experiences/discover) < HUMAN > Boy(heroes/Discovering) > Man( virtues/searching ) > Mature( Rules/Training) > Wise ( Outcomes/Limits )
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 11:06:00 UTC
if you have rule of law for everyone (defensive governance) but minority rule of the commons, you will get less politicking.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 16:44:00 UTC
WHAT IS AMERICA’S RUBICON?
—“What is America’s metaphorical Rubicon?”—Brad Lundgren
by Dmitry Chernov
Constitutional Crisis. Several examples. Jackson defying the Supreme Court to remove the Cherokee. Lincoln arresting the legislators in Maryland to prevent Secession (actually a variety of actions he took.) In theory, Nixon’s firing of Cox – but since Nixon was Pardoned it simply doesn’t matter there. Ditto Lincoln who kept the country together and no one would think of prosecuting realistically, and Jackson who lived in an era well before those kinds of checks were really well-developed and acted decisively in his Executive Authority in spite of High Court squeamish attempts at interference. We’re approaching that again. The question is does Trump fulfill the promise of Trump, or try to make a deal with the deep state?
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 10:26:00 UTC
The only ‘Rights’ you
possess are those that you can enforce.
All else is Privilege.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 16:48:00 UTC
THE EVOLUTIONARY CYCLE OF THE CRITERIA FOR EQUALITY
(priceless)
by Bill Joslin
1) LAW: Equality before the law, formed in the wake of costly rebellion where arbitrary, inconsistent, discretionary application of law bred resentment, encouraged retaliation and ultimately rebellion.
2) OPPORTUNITY: Equality of opportunity – as the welfare state rise and regulation became the staple of the state, upper middle classes pled for the state from interfering in opportunity (via statute and regulation)
3) OUTCOME: Equality of outcome – romantics, upset about a rising gentry aligned themselves with the underclass causes to “shame” the capitalist gentry. Faced with the reality that no one is equal, they pointed at unequal outcomes as an example of hypocrisy and encourages the state to “level the playing Feild”.
Leveling the Feild requires the state to develope special rights for the disadvantaged. This results in arbitrary, inconsistent and discretionary application of law….
Wash rinse repeat.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 18:39:00 UTC
Book. Easily 500 pages. That’s what you see me posting images of. First chapter serves as an overview of the entire program. Each other chapter expands on the program. The constitution concludes the work. Second on application to moral questions Lots of supporting stuff. Huge amount of content. I’m at 300+ pages now and I don’t think I’m halfway done. So the book evolves from an initial promise, to a table of contents out line, to an overview, to topic by topic coverage, to a constitution, to the reformation of the ‘fields’, to application to moral principles, and then to essays, quotes and glossary. etc.
Courses. I have the intro course content done and can now finish the overview content. Hard part remaining is teaching methodology. I was working on that for much of july.
Remaining work is largely methodology, selecting text to add to fill holes, and then we will have to all give it a review so that we find stuff that’s missing or unclear.
I can see the end so I am very excited.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-26 12:59:00 UTC
I would be in jail in Germany and france and fined in the UK.
And all I do is talk about painful truths.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-25 22:32:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/889976598518222848
Reply addressees: @woke8yearold
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/889678242956931072
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/889678242956931072
the reason they liked duels was because it stopped impassioned ‘fights in the moment’, in an era where everyone always had at least a knife and often was physically strong as only farmers are, while agreeing to fight and preserving ‘face’ – but then allowing time for cooler heads to prevail, and apologies to be issued. The material problem with the duel was the use of champions (professionals), and then using ‘constructed’ challenges to commit no better than murder by the use of champions. It was and remains, easy to fix.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-25 07:25:00 UTC
DIMENSIONS OF LEGAL COMPOSITION
1 – Relative value of the individual’s cooperation.
2 – Relative distribution of decisions over property (individual, family, extended family, clan, tribe, polity.)
3 – Relative equality in defense (of mind, body, action, and property)
4 – Relative inequality in offense (politics) demonstrated by achievement in the various markets. (association, production, reproduction, commons production, defense production)
5 – Limited by duty of the Insurer (parent, clan, polity, soldiery)
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-19 07:47:00 UTC