Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • Im starting to very seriously think that one should not be able to have kids out

    Im starting to very seriously think that one should not be able to have kids outside marriage or a marriage-like contract. The problem with rothbards idea of the parent-child relationship is that he fails to subscribe the parent to any kind of responsibility for the existence of the child and therefor sees the child more as some alien figure that the parent may wish to have company with, a relationship that can be terminated at any time as if it were similar to any other. In fact, the parents must have ultimate responsibilities for the existence of the child and therefore also for its well being until such a time where is has assumed its full set of rights (adulthood). Hence, there must be an implicit parent-child contract that takes into consideration reasonable expectations and duties in raising and generally taking care for the child. This contract must be based in reality, including historic, biological, social, and scientific, and must reject modern lies (reality denying) and pseudo-scientific conceptions. In practice, this means that a child must be raised in a stable mother-farther household where appropriate resources are given to both the general welfare of the household, and specifically to the child themselves. Economically, the most efficient and correct way of achieving this is through division of labour between a stay-at-home caretaker (mother) and industrious worker (father). Marriage and marriage-like contracts ensure this happens and traditionally are very difficult to annul, carrying significant penalties and reparations for breech or withdrawal of contract. In the case of those who do have a child outside such a contract, then they must be assumed to have entered into one on birth of the child, and breech of contract/duty must be able to be resolved in court by the other parent or on behalf of the child.

  • PERFECT GOVERNMENT We had the Best System of Government (Perfect Government) and

    PERFECT GOVERNMENT

    We had the Best System of Government (Perfect Government) and we blew it:

    1) Nomocracy (Rule of Law by Natural Law of Torts: Reciprocity)

    2) A Hereditary Monarchy as Judge of Last Resort, and custodian of territory, institutions, organizations, families, and individuals.

    …. A State(Foreign Relations) Organization,

    …. A Professional Military,

    …. A Professional Judiciary, and

    …. A Treasury of Last Resort.

    3) A Market for Commons consisting of:

    …. Regional Nobility(Persistent families) serving as a normative Supreme Court

    …. A House of Industry(Commons) for those with responsibilities.

    …. A Church Serving as a House of Labor and family.

    4) A Local (Democratic) Polity(private partnership) of Property Owners

    …. A Militia and Sheriffs

    …. Voluntary Civic Organizations

    5) The Nuclear Family. And Family and Nation as subject of policy

    6) The Individual and Property as the subject of law.

    Really. You can’t do much better than that for a ‘steady state’. Because under war or stress the organization can switch from market rule to military rule (Fascism), and under plenty the organization can switch from market rule to (contingent and temporary) redistribution.

    The central probelm with all forms of government is nothing more complex than the demographics of the polity. The larger the demonstrated underclass, the less effective a government and the more risk involved and the more limited are one’s options. The smaller the demonstrated underclass, the more effective a government and the less risk involved and the more plentiful (variable) are one’s options.

    Market governments cause a natural eugenic change in the distribution, while creating the greatest adaptability, rate of innovation(competition) and highest standard of living.

    But they require a militia or at least a dedicated military to bring into being.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-14 15:27:00 UTC

  • Perfect Government

    We had the Best System of Government (Perfect Government) and we blew it: 1) Nomocracy (Rule of Law by Natural Law of Torts: Reciprocity) 2) A Hereditary Monarchy as Judge of Last Resort, and custodian of territory, institutions, organizations, families, and individuals. …. A State(Foreign Relations) Organization, …. A Professional Military, …. A Professional Judiciary, and …. A Treasury of Last Resort. 3) A Market for Commons consisting of: …. Regional Nobility(Persistent families) serving as a normative Supreme Court …. A House of Industry(Commons) for those with responsibilities. …. A Church Serving as a House of Labor and family. 4) A Local (Democratic) Polity(private partnership) of Property Owners …. A Militia and Sheriffs …. Voluntary Civic Organizations 5) The Nuclear Family. And Family and Nation as subject of policy 6) The Individual and Property as the subject of law. Really. You can’t do much better than that for a ‘steady state’. Because under war or stress the organization can switch from market rule to military rule (Fascism), and under plenty the organization can switch from market rule to (contingent and temporary) redistribution. The central probelm with all forms of government is nothing more complex than the demographics of the polity. The larger the demonstrated underclass, the less effective a government and the more risk involved and the more limited are one’s options. The smaller the demonstrated underclass, the more effective a government and the less risk involved and the more plentiful (variable) are one’s options. Market governments cause a natural eugenic change in the distribution, while creating the greatest adaptability, rate of innovation(competition) and highest standard of living. But they require a militia or at least a dedicated military to bring into being. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Perfect Government

    We had the Best System of Government (Perfect Government) and we blew it: 1) Nomocracy (Rule of Law by Natural Law of Torts: Reciprocity) 2) A Hereditary Monarchy as Judge of Last Resort, and custodian of territory, institutions, organizations, families, and individuals. …. A State(Foreign Relations) Organization, …. A Professional Military, …. A Professional Judiciary, and …. A Treasury of Last Resort. 3) A Market for Commons consisting of: …. Regional Nobility(Persistent families) serving as a normative Supreme Court …. A House of Industry(Commons) for those with responsibilities. …. A Church Serving as a House of Labor and family. 4) A Local (Democratic) Polity(private partnership) of Property Owners …. A Militia and Sheriffs …. Voluntary Civic Organizations 5) The Nuclear Family. And Family and Nation as subject of policy 6) The Individual and Property as the subject of law. Really. You can’t do much better than that for a ‘steady state’. Because under war or stress the organization can switch from market rule to military rule (Fascism), and under plenty the organization can switch from market rule to (contingent and temporary) redistribution. The central probelm with all forms of government is nothing more complex than the demographics of the polity. The larger the demonstrated underclass, the less effective a government and the more risk involved and the more limited are one’s options. The smaller the demonstrated underclass, the more effective a government and the less risk involved and the more plentiful (variable) are one’s options. Market governments cause a natural eugenic change in the distribution, while creating the greatest adaptability, rate of innovation(competition) and highest standard of living. But they require a militia or at least a dedicated military to bring into being. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Joell Davis Our sacred rights as Englishmen descend from (the quasi-myth of) the

    Joell Davis

    Our sacred rights as Englishmen descend from (the quasi-myth of) the Magna Carta, a contract between the Sovereign and his people, a promise to respect and protect their life, liberty and property in return for their loyalty and service.

    Anglo militias have time and again staged rebellions against sovereigns who broke this sacred contract. Their blood gave us our inheritance of liberty, not God.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-13 21:30:00 UTC

  • Joell Davis Our sacred rights as Englishmen descend from (the quasi-myth of) the

    Joell Davis Our sacred rights as Englishmen descend from (the quasi-myth of) the Magna Carta, a contract between the Sovereign and his people, a promise to respect and protect their life, liberty and property in return for their loyalty and service. Anglo militias have time and again staged rebellions against sovereigns who broke this sacred contract. Their blood gave us our inheritance of liberty, not God.

  • Joell Davis Our sacred rights as Englishmen descend from (the quasi-myth of) the

    Joell Davis Our sacred rights as Englishmen descend from (the quasi-myth of) the Magna Carta, a contract between the Sovereign and his people, a promise to respect and protect their life, liberty and property in return for their loyalty and service. Anglo militias have time and again staged rebellions against sovereigns who broke this sacred contract. Their blood gave us our inheritance of liberty, not God.

  • “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that t

    —“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”—

    Its an incomplete sentence (just like NAP). Fully expand the sentence. The fully expanded sentence in context would be:

    —“All men are created equal under the law of nature and nature’s god, and therefore, if willing and able to bear arms, they are free to choose their customs, and Kings. Therefore Kings do not rule by divine right but by license of the men willing and able of bearing arms to replace them with another more suited to their pursuit of prosperity in life, liberty, and property.”—

    That is the full meaning of the original sentence.

    Jeff Odgis

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-28 13:27:00 UTC

  • THE CLASS ACTION AGAINST GOOGLE… (that is how it is done) One suit at a time.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-23/ex-google-engineer-james-damore-hires-harmeet-dhillon-as-lawyerBUILDING THE CLASS ACTION AGAINST GOOGLE…

    (that is how it is done)

    One suit at a time. Break the culture of ‘inevitability’.

    (a) hiring, (b) consumer data and tracking (c) paying for position.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-23 21:28:00 UTC

  • GREEK LAW 500 BC Divorce and marriage rights[edit] The Gortyn law code grants a

    GREEK LAW 500 BC

    Divorce and marriage rights[edit]

    The Gortyn law code grants a modicum of property rights to women in the case of divorce. Divorced women are entitled to any property that they brought to the marriage and half of the joint income if derived from her property. The code also provides for a portion of the household property. The code stipulates that any children conceived before the divorce but born after the divorce fall under the custody of the father. If the father does not accept the child, it reverts to the mother.

    Property rights and inheritance[edit]

    The code devotes a great deal of attention to the allocation and management of property. Although the husband manages the majority of the family property, the wife’s property is still delineated. If the wife dies, the husband becomes the trustee to her property and may take no action on it without the consent of her children. In the case of remarriage, the first wife’s property immediately comes into her children’s possession. If the wife dies childless, her property reverts to her blood relatives.

    If the husband dies with children, the property is held in trust by the wife for the children. If the children are of age upon their father’s death, the property is divided between the children, with males receiving all of the land. If the husband dies without any children, the wife is compelled to remarry.

    Adopted children receive all the inheritance rights of natural children and are considered legitimate heirs in all cases. Women are not allowed to adopt children.[6]

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-20 21:25:00 UTC