Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • RT @RealJamesWoods: This action by the Obama administration was an abuse of the

    RT @RealJamesWoods: This action by the Obama administration was an abuse of the constitution and an assault on our cherished Republic. He a…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-04 22:53:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/960285278874333185

  • Why Do Many Leftist Policies Conflict With The U.s. Constitution?

    Because America was designed to be a ‘third way’ between theocracy and monarchy/oligarchy, by creating a purely commercial purely middle class society.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-many-leftist-policies-conflict-with-the-U-S-constitution

  • Why Do Many Leftist Policies Conflict With The U.s. Constitution?

    Because America was designed to be a ‘third way’ between theocracy and monarchy/oligarchy, by creating a purely commercial purely middle class society.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-many-leftist-policies-conflict-with-the-U-S-constitution

  • OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distribu

    OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distributed dictatorship of sovereign warriors. I don’t think a constitutional oligarchy matters – it might be good. it’s not as good as a constitutional monarchy. The problems are (a) democracy (b) freedom of false speech, (c) ability to circumvent of rule of law of reciprocity due to the frailty of the constitution, (d) the loss of universal standing in matters of the commons (we can’t sue politicians and bureaucrats), (e) we have no mechanism for evolving necessary monopoly bureaucracy into competitive private organizations once institutionalized (habituated). (f) the failure to modernize the fiat money system for direct distribution of liquidity to consumers rather than through credit in the financial system. (g) it has been possible to forcibly ‘convert’ the population from the nuclear family and civic responsibility, and immigrate the underclasses the country was designed to escape from (not to mention the civil rights acts, and the civil war) which caused forced integration).
  • OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distribu

    OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distributed dictatorship of sovereign warriors.

    I don’t think a constitutional oligarchy matters – it might be good. it’s not as good as a constitutional monarchy. The problems are (a) democracy (b) freedom of false speech, (c) ability to circumvent of rule of law of reciprocity due to the frailty of the constitution, (d) the loss of universal standing in matters of the commons (we can’t sue politicians and bureaucrats), (e) we have no mechanism for evolving necessary monopoly bureaucracy into competitive private organizations once institutionalized (habituated). (f) the failure to modernize the fiat money system for direct distribution of liquidity to consumers rather than through credit in the financial system. (g) it has been possible to forcibly ‘convert’ the population from the nuclear family and civic responsibility, and immigrate the underclasses the country was designed to escape from (not to mention the civil rights acts, and the civil war) which caused forced integration).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-25 08:02:00 UTC

  • OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distribu

    OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distributed dictatorship of sovereign warriors. I don’t think a constitutional oligarchy matters – it might be good. it’s not as good as a constitutional monarchy. The problems are (a) democracy (b) freedom of false speech, (c) ability to circumvent of rule of law of reciprocity due to the frailty of the constitution, (d) the loss of universal standing in matters of the commons (we can’t sue politicians and bureaucrats), (e) we have no mechanism for evolving necessary monopoly bureaucracy into competitive private organizations once institutionalized (habituated). (f) the failure to modernize the fiat money system for direct distribution of liquidity to consumers rather than through credit in the financial system. (g) it has been possible to forcibly ‘convert’ the population from the nuclear family and civic responsibility, and immigrate the underclasses the country was designed to escape from (not to mention the civil rights acts, and the civil war) which caused forced integration).
  • Either obey the law or leave. It’s not complicated. Why did he fail to obey the

    Either obey the law or leave. It’s not complicated. Why did he fail to obey the law? Why are progressives selective about obeying the law and why are conservatives NOT selective about obeying the law?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 13:30:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955432467892187136

    Reply addressees: @washingtonpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955430499903856640


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955430499903856640

  • My answer to Why do Americans love to sue each other?

    My answer to Why do Americans love to sue each other? https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-love-to-sue-each-other/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=26c22489


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-21 13:09:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955064906822356992

  • My answer to Why do Americans love to sue each other?

    My answer to Why do Americans love to sue each other? https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-love-to-sue-each-other/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-21 13:09:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955064880666685445

  • —-”Why do Americans love to sue each other?”—- TWO REASONS, 1-COMMERCIAL, and 2-

    —-”Why do Americans love to sue each other?”—- TWO REASONS, 1-COMMERCIAL, and 2-CIVIL 1 – COMMERCIAL. Europeans and most of the world REGULATE ability to engage in agreements. Americans RESOLVE conflicts in court instead. This is why there is such a big difference between american and european innovation at all but the macro industrial levels, and frankly why europeans are poorer than americans (aside from the number of hours worked). So europeans and most others use BUREAUCRATIC PRIOR RESTRAINT to limit conflict at the expense of experimentation, innovation, and the size of the entrepreneurial classes, and Americans use JURIDICAL RESOLUTION to resolve conflict in order to obtain experimentation, innovation, the size of the entrepreneurial classes, despite the (lower) cost of juridical resolutoin. Americans consider the RIGHT TO FAIL part of liberty. Europeans (it seems strange to us) are afraid of failure. For example Bankruptcy for an american entrepreneur who tries again, simply means he’s heroic for having tried, and more heroic for getting up and doing it again. Whereas in europe it’s still socially unacceptable. (Which in modern economic terms is rather ridiculous). So different societies place controls at different places and pay different prices for those controls. Americans favor rule of law by the natural law of tort while what we consider the ‘nanny state’ prohibits such experimentation. (I have owned businesses internationally and … I wouldn’t even consider doing business in France because of laws, or Italy because of the impossibility of the tax code). It’s 10x as hard in canada, and 50x as hard in the UK. For no good reason. It’s always seems like some moron takes great pride in throwing up requirements and objections to suppress non existent or marginal risks. (That and brits tend to be fairly lazy.) Germans are wonderful people at all levels but the bureaucracy inhibiting entrepreeneurship is just daunting. In america you can pretty much lose money for three years and never pay a dime in taxes. If you do it right you can lose money for ten years an never pay a dime in taxes. This is how people learn to become entrepreneurs – by failing a little bit until they succeed. 2 – CIVIL. We have nothing in common except commerce, and all claims of a melting pot outside of dense urban centers are false. Unlike European countries we have been prohibited sine the 1960’s from enforcing norms. So Americans had the same problem with Jewish conformity in the 20th century that Europeans are having with Islamic conformity – and for the same reasons. We allowed this process to continue with tolerance and it ended up destroying our nation by way of ‘diversity’. Ergo, without norms enforced we must LITIGATE disputes. This will come to europe if it hasn’t already. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine