Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • Every Man A Sheriff

    —“Do we want to live in a society, and world, where everyone is carrying firearms?”— Like anything else, the pareto minimum is 20%. Once you reach 20%, for all intents and purposes, everyone must assume everyone is carrying.
  • The problem with “Human Rights” is in the determination of who in fact is ‘human

    The problem with “Human Rights” is in the determination of who in fact is ‘human’, and who remains some degree of domesticated animal. (humor)
  • The problem with “Human Rights” is in the determination of who in fact is ‘human

    The problem with “Human Rights” is in the determination of who in fact is ‘human’, and who remains some degree of domesticated animal.

    (humor)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-19 17:57:00 UTC

  • Was Government Regulation Necessary To Prevent Thalidomide Babies From Increasing?

    Governments (almost always)consist of humans, who’s principle function as “Insurer of last resort”.

    It is entirely rational for insurers to demand warranty of all products, services, and information, in the marketplace that they insure.

    One cannot himself warranty actions for which he cannot pay restitution.

    This is the limit of moral action – that which you can pay restitution for.

    one cannot pay the cost of restitution for ‘defective’ lives.

    And if you study the literature, you’ll quickly understand that very small portions of society cost very large portions of our problems.

    https://www.quora.com/Was-government-regulation-necessary-to-prevent-thalidomide-babies-from-increasing

  • Was Government Regulation Necessary To Prevent Thalidomide Babies From Increasing?

    Governments (almost always)consist of humans, who’s principle function as “Insurer of last resort”.

    It is entirely rational for insurers to demand warranty of all products, services, and information, in the marketplace that they insure.

    One cannot himself warranty actions for which he cannot pay restitution.

    This is the limit of moral action – that which you can pay restitution for.

    one cannot pay the cost of restitution for ‘defective’ lives.

    And if you study the literature, you’ll quickly understand that very small portions of society cost very large portions of our problems.

    https://www.quora.com/Was-government-regulation-necessary-to-prevent-thalidomide-babies-from-increasing

  • William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not mate

    William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not materialized into the commons. Personally held opinions which cannot be constructed into a viable argument or claim are either premature or presumption. We can take from this the true nature of the popular habit of airing one’s opinion to peers: infantilism by gossip. Now, OTOH, if a group of persons is exploring a matter then contributions are transmitted and received by the same discretion (reciprocity). But these transmissions do not reach the level of published theory, or declared truth-claim. They’re exploratory. Many errors must be presented in the process of singling out the least erroneous, for the one most truthful. This discretion cannot be granted to a party declaring a truth-claim. It must be warranted. (BAM!)
  • William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not mate

    William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not materialized into the commons. Personally held opinions which cannot be constructed into a viable argument or claim are either premature or presumption. We can take from this the true nature of the popular habit of airing one’s opinion to peers: infantilism by gossip. Now, OTOH, if a group of persons is exploring a matter then contributions are transmitted and received by the same discretion (reciprocity). But these transmissions do not reach the level of published theory, or declared truth-claim. They’re exploratory. Many errors must be presented in the process of singling out the least erroneous, for the one most truthful. This discretion cannot be granted to a party declaring a truth-claim. It must be warranted. (BAM!)
  • William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not mate

    William L. Benge

    Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not materialized into the commons. Personally held opinions which cannot be constructed into a viable argument or claim are either premature or presumption.

    We can take from this the true nature of the popular habit of airing one’s opinion to peers: infantilism by gossip.

    Now, OTOH, if a group of persons is exploring a matter then contributions are transmitted and received by the same discretion (reciprocity).

    But these transmissions do not reach the level of published theory, or declared truth-claim. They’re exploratory. Many errors must be presented in the process of singling out the least erroneous, for the one most truthful.

    This discretion cannot be granted to a party declaring a truth-claim.

    It must be warranted.

    (BAM!)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-14 12:18:00 UTC

  • Doing my job man. Building the argument for revolution, and the constitution to

    Doing my job man. Building the argument for revolution, and the constitution to replace the current one, a day at a time….


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-07 00:38:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/961036378871132160

    Reply addressees: @theS0D

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/961010561688522752


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/961010561688522752

  • 2) Jewish law retained Pilpul (The verbal equivalent of numerology, and astrolog

    2) Jewish law retained Pilpul (The verbal equivalent of numerology, and astrology applied to theology). While (thankfully) western law retained empiricism (Tort). Over time, the Lawyers cum philosophers saved us where the theologians cum philosophers failed.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-05 19:50:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/960601591589101568

    Reply addressees: @Daylonism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/960597943827931136


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hermeus_Amer

    @curtdoolittle I could be off base on this, but are your referring specifically to various forms of Jewish mysticism and Jews themselves? (medieval Kabbalah, Neo-Hassidism, etc..).

    Or the influence of Abrahamic traditions (starting with Jews) in general?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/960597943827931136