Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • Civil War: Enforcement: Threats, Charges, and Duties (“The Black Pages”)

    Enforcement

    Threats, Charges, and Duties

    “Violence is neither good nor bad – it is a resource put to ends good or bad. Violence to obtain self determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, and testimony, in concert with physical natural and evolutionary laws, against a tide of civilizationcide, culturecide, ethnocide, and genocide, is a necessary, virtuous and heroic end.”

    Introduction

    While our demands are just, such demands lack weight unless accompanied by threats, promises, and the conviction to follow, keep, and act upon them. Therefore we promise the following:

    Our Goal

    We have only one goal.  That is to demand the military:
    1. Prevent a Civil War
    2. Declare martial law
    3. Vacate the House, and Senate
    4. Vacate the Governments of the Rebellious cities
    5. Seize assets of hostile parties
    6. Install this constitution
    7. Enact its articles and policies.
    8. Return control of the government to the states.
    ( Counsel: The military will have no option, since the alternative will be incapacity to act either in foreign or domestic theatres, resulting in fighting wars on all fronts in an era under which it cannot possibly do so. In other words, we will force a controlled contraction under military guidance in furtherance of this constitution or an uncontrolled contraction in resistance to it. ) Strategy Our traditional way of war our traditional demand for reformation Weakness “Never has an empire been more fragile” Tactics “Silence, Darkness, Immobility, Hunger, and Cold” Cessation “Attrition Warfare Within a Polity, Once Started, Gains Momentum”

    Threats

    Means and Methods of War

    (…)

    Charges and Duties

    Our Direction to Our People

    1 – Restoration of Free Truthful Speech. 1 – Use Zero Tolerance: Free Speech Is Restored: … Political Speech shall constitute Protected Speech. … Liability for suppression of political speech is enacted. … No one may PreventCensorDenyProtest,  Criticize the use of, ShameRallyPsychologizeMoralizeDemonizeShout Down Political Speech, or “Doxx” (search for and publish private or identifying information), Threaten or Terminate employment, contract or agreement. … Heads of organizations, employees, vendors shareholders, are equally responsible for defense of political speech and offense or insult has no bearing. 2 – Liability for the Suppression of Truthful speech is enacted. 3 – Liability for Defamation by Falsehood is restored. 4 – Liability for harm by falsehood or irreciprocity to the informational commons is enacted. 5 – All citizens have the obligation to use law enforcement, violence, or extrajudicial punishment to enforce these liabilities under the Restoration of Free Truthful Speech. 2 – Revocation of Tolerance for Separatism 1 – Use Zero Tolerance: All symbols of non-integration to and separatism from European culture or Natural Law, Constitution and Institutions, including competition to Christian and Pagan religions, are prohibited, including religious, cultural, and political dress, symbols, signs, displays, language. 2 – Use Zero Tolerance: All public gatherings in celebration or reinforcement of any separatist display, word, or deed are prohibited. 3 – Use Zero Tolerance: All evangelism of or argumentative defense of any separatist display, word, or deed, is prohibited. 4 – And all citizens have the obligation and right to use law enforcement, violence, or extrajudicial punishment to enforce intolerance for separatism, and non-integration. 3 – Restoration of Citizen’s Defense of Private and Commons. 1 – Use Zero Tolerance: Carry arms if you have them, at all times, and be prepared to use them at all times. 2 – Use Zero Tolerance: “Shoot First, and Shoot To Kill” in the cases of Intentionally Blocking Roads or Walkways, Stalking, Aggression, Threatening, Violence, Trespass, Porch Pirating, Robbery, Looting and Rioting. 3 – Use Zero Tolerance: Threaten, Confront. Arrest, Bind, and Contain or Kill if necessary, anyone in your neighborhood, not living in your neighborhood, or without documented commercial requirement to service a customer in your neighborhood. 4 – Reward for fighting to install this constitution 1 – The family of anyone who fights shall receive no less than $8,000 per month, within the first seven days of the month, from their current bank, direct from the central bank, from the treasury, for the duration of the fight. 2 – Anyone who joins and fights in the first thirty days lives tax-free for life. 3 – Anyone who joins and fights in the first thirty days receives a $250,000 one time payment from the Treasury at the end of the fight. 4 – Anyone who fights keeps whatever loot obtained from any opposition during the fighting. 5 – Anyone in the treasury and banking system that fails this duty, or abandons his post, office or job shall be summarily expelled from the nation. Anyone who resists the fulfillment of this demand shall be summarily executed. 5 – (behavior toward police, fire, emergency, politicians, celebrities)

    Our Direction to Our Officers Soldiers, Sheriffs, and Police

    ( … ) Borders shall be closed Immigration and naturalization halted.

    Our Direction to First Responders

    ( … ) Our Direction to Politicians, Bureaucrats and Dependents ( … ) You keep as long as you do not interfere. Otherwise, you lose, and you lose your life.

    Regarding Willing Accomplices

    A Threat to Employers of Conspirators (subsidy for automation) Only in case of immediate reporting and termination: If you cannot automate, and cannot find employees, then you may declare bankruptcy, the State will absorb your debts, and you may receive 60% of your salary for 10 years in compensation, in addition to the constitutional redistributions. If we discover even one post 1964 immigrants in your employment, your assets and your life are forfeit, and you will be subject to summary execution. Whereas (remember for 10000 years), end the dark age of Semitism for eternity. Therefore;

    Regarding Agents of The Enemies

    (21 days to exit with anything you can carry, or execution on sight ) Miscegenation The positioning of white men Anti White Speech, display or deed. ( … ) Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc… deplatforming. Soros Southern Poverty Law Center New York Times

    Regarding Enemies

    Given that Men of moral mind must possess direct instruction free of interpretation when engaged in acts of prosecution, restitution, and punishment by violence; we charge the Men among our People with the following Duties during the process of transition: Whereas there exists no possible claim under the Natural Law by which to resist the Declaration, Constitution, and this Warranty; Therefore;

    Regarding Compliance:

    Questions for assistance in compliance are necessary. And all possible assistance shall be given to those willing to comply, and those who engage in the methods of our enemies by baiting, entrapment, or fraud of honest people shall be punished as traitors. Regarding Exit: ( … ) Must be provided exit.  Forcible repatriation. ( … ) Regarding Resistance: Whereas questions for assistance in compliance are necessary, resistance is not. Therefore any and all counter-signaling, counter-argument, resistance, and anything other than immediate obedience shall require summary execution by strangling or hanging; or in the case of physical resistance, any means at the posse’s disposal. Any organized resistance shall require summary execution of three generations of the relations of that individual in every direction. (Counsel: The purpose of familial punishment is to force the families to take responsibility for the actions of their members, thus reducing the burden on the Men. Under The Law, everyone is forever responsible for defending the People against one’s kin for three generations in every direction.  The history of man is one of some family members taking unnatural actions on the behalf of their relations without punishment of the relations for benefiting from the crime. As such, every family member is responsible for the actions of every other. ) Regarding Defection: Defectors and Traitors shall be shot, beheaded, hung, crucified, burned, or impaled. Leaders shall be killed. Followers may convert, lose their franchise, forfeit their property, and pay the taxation, or leave, or die. Having claimed conversion and recanted to any degree, they shall be prosecuted as defectors and traitors.  All who interfere shall be prosecuted as defectors and traitors and shot, beheaded, hung, crucified, burned, or impaled. Regarding Enemy Shareholder Property ( … ) Regarding Financial Institutions Regarding The Fine Arts Any fine furniture, arts and artifacts of any other than Muslim or Jewish origin must be preserved and delivered to museums, libraries, or post offices, under penalty of Death by Treason.

    Regarding Others

    Our Appeals to Enemies of Our Mutual Enemy

    ( … )

    Our Promise to Others

    ( … )

    Canada

    Australia

    Britain

    Europe

    Russia

    India

    China

    Africa

    World Reaction

    —“if Your Goals Are Realized in The Us, What (do You Believe) Would Be the Effect on Global Hegemony? Is This Speculation Worthwhile?”—

    Yes, Speculation Is Worthwhile Because External Effect Is Part of The Desired Outcome. Let’s Assume One of Four Initial Reactions: 1 – External Actors Will Become More Confident in World Affairs and More Critical of Us Activity in The World. 2 – External Actors Will Support the Activity of Activists 3 – External Actors Will Seize Opportunities for Political Expansion of Influence. 4 – External Actors Will Seize Opportunities for Military Expansion of Influence. The Degree of Change in The World Will Be Dependent upon Those Actions and The Outcome of A Revolutionary Change: 1 – Acquiescence by The State and Restoration of The Powers of The States. 2 – Continuing Declining Low-Level Civil Warfare and Related Economic Decline 3 – A Significant Uprising that Forces the Military to Enact Martial Law . 4 – A Significant Uprising that Forces the Military to Call Troops from Abroad to American Soil. By and large the balance of powers will be restored, and either way, America will return to a domestic rather than imperial power. Since everyone knows this, particularly the upper levels of the military, the objective (my objective) is to make a revolutionary outcome so certain that the government merely meets our demands for devolution to the states. It is hard to object to my proposal other than out of job defense or collusion with the world’s globalist movement. We will own the blue water navy for a long time to come. We will lose and want to lose our responsibility for defending Europe. That will force Germany and Russia to work together and end our conflict. China much like Russia operates entirely for its domestic market. The USA operates for its globalist market. We just need to restore the balance of powers and then we can all focus on the only remaining enemy to the world: Judaism-Islam. What Will the Rest of The World Do? African states will resist the forcible repatriation of Africans. India will resist the forcible Repatriation of Indians. Mexico will resist the forcible repatriation of South Americans. The Muslim States will resist the forcible repatriation of Muslims Israel may or may not resist the forcible repatriation of Jews. The world will seek historical equilibrium in their spheres of influence, and the military will have to return to the continent rather than protecting Europe, thereby forcing Europe and Russia and eastern Europe into their historical alliance (Christendom). The outlier is the UK and if at all possible, it would be preferable to restore the British empire as the alliance of English speaking peoples. Incentives are relatively obvious at this point. We are the pin that holds the world together. But nuclear arms are what they are. The expected result is acceleration of what everyone in every think tank in the world suggests: The return to normal across the world.
  • “Productive conflict results in enforceable local contracts and meaningful dispu

    —“Productive conflict results in enforceable local contracts and meaningful dispute resolutions, eliminating the need for a grand moral contracts like equality to compensate for local shortcomings.”–Pat Ryan

    (via Brandon Hayes)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-17 15:09:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107298032796737537

  • “Productive conflict results in enforceable local contracts and meaningful dispu

    —“Productive conflict results in enforceable local contracts and meaningful dispute resolutions, eliminating the need for a grand moral contracts like equality to compensate for local shortcomings.”–Pat Ryan

    (via Brandon Hayes)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-17 11:09:00 UTC

  • We don’t do ideology. Because we do law we do policy. People will vote for and a

    We don’t do ideology. Because we do law we do policy. People will vote for and act in favor of policy. What you mean is stupid people can’t argue law and policy. I agree. They don’t have to. They just have to fight for something that is ACTIONABLE rather than an empty word.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 15:35:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106942142193303555

    Reply addressees: @HonkHonkler88 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106940587272339456


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106940587272339456

  • we don’t do ideology. We do law. Countries are run by an operating system we cal

    we don’t do ideology. We do law. Countries are run by an operating system we call ‘law’. It’s the only way that they CAN be run. You can build all three of those ideologies, but you must do it with law. And to do it and prevent (((enemies))) you must do it with Propertarianism.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 15:34:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106941807672348675

    Reply addressees: @HonkHonkler88 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106940587272339456


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106940587272339456

  • THE DEVIL IN THE WORD ‘IS’ AND PROPERTARIANISM One ‘is’ a propertarian the way o

    THE DEVIL IN THE WORD ‘IS’ AND PROPERTARIANISM

    One ‘is’ a propertarian the way one is a doctor, lawyer, engineer or mathematician. It’s a discipline of law. That’s it.

    Where “is = A PRACTITIONER OF A DISCIPLINE”

    One ‘is’ an advocate for a social order or other.

    Where “is = AN ADVOCATE FOR A CLASS PREFERENCE”

    One ‘is’ a member of one religious habituation or other.

    Where ‘is = A SET OF INDOCTRINATED COGNITIVE BIASES”

    Propertarianism is rule of law: Nomocracy (NO-MO’-crah-see)

    Where “is = IDENTITY (equal to).”

    Propertarianism is a formal rule of law that eliminates disinformation in the commons, and particularly the means of abrahamic deception we call baiting, pilpul and critique.

    Where “is = AN ADVOCATE FOR EXPANSION OF INVOLUNTARY WARRANTY TO SPEECH”

    Curt Doolittle ‘is’ an advocate for Nomocracy, Militia, Monarchy, Ethnocentrism, Nationalism, and Shared Returns (dividends) on the Realm (state profits) for western peoples in particular, but for all peoples capable of it.

    Where “is = An ADVOCATE for ARISTOCRACY”

    Curt Doolittle ‘is’ an advocate for policies that produce what we would call national socialism in the original french german and italian ambitions, but by rule of law and market means unlimited by previous failures to understand money and economics as merely information and influence.

    Where “is = AN ADVOCATE FOR NATIONAL SOCIALIST POLICIES IN THE FACE OF ONGOING AUTOMATION”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 12:13:00 UTC

  • out of context. it means intolerance for crime is a good thing

    out of context. it means intolerance for crime is a good thing.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 23:51:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106342201288736769

    Reply addressees: @robertedecan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106340853877039105


    IN REPLY TO:

    @robertedecan

    What!?! https://t.co/5Fq8XUhG8R

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106340853877039105

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54434826_10157047905222264_166179166

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54434826_10157047905222264_1661791665083383808_o_10157047905217264.jpg As far as I know we are very close to submission to the inescapable necessity, that the physics of the universe at existential scale is complete, and that no forces or interactions exist or can that we do not know of.

    Moreover that modifying our ‘stories’ such that they, our experiences, our thoughts, and actions work ever closer to those rules. In other words, a majority of people demonstrate preference for the results even if a minority demonstrate preference for what produces those results.

    Worse, that we evolved our language, cooperation in a division of labor, and all our works, in a period of very short ‘safety’ here on this earth, and here in this place in the universe. We do not have any luxury of ‘free riding’ on this world or the universe.

    But it is this particular difference between those of us who seek to consume(relax) above all else, and those of us who seek to produce(achieve) above all else, that separates our understanding of the world.

    As far as I can determine, we all seek to create stories that are discordant with that universe for a host of reasons – all of which are reducible to our desires being contrary to it.

    Because we survive and prosper by the same means as does all life: the seizure of opportunity to resist entropy.Martin ŠtěpánWhat’s the W?Mar 14, 2019, 10:44 AMMartin ŠtěpánHave you just figured out the theory of everything or what is this?Mar 14, 2019, 10:48 AMDavin EastleyIs this pullin’ our legs? Where’s this from? :OMar 14, 2019, 11:00 AMKyle KalutkiewiczMartin Štěpán It’s the partition function for the standard model coupled to general relativity. g is gravity, A are the force fields (photon, gluon, etc), ψ are the matter fields (electrons, quarks, etc), ϕ is the Higgs boson.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_function_(quantum_field_theory)Mar 14, 2019, 11:06 AMPaul BardSo I guess after the Higgs must come the Hugs spectrum huh.Mar 14, 2019, 11:34 AMAlba RisingIt’s crazy that the equation describing the universe contains an imaginary number, i.Mar 14, 2019, 3:24 PMNick HeywoodI just woke up.

    And the first 2 things I see are the speech periodic table and this. FFS!

    Tell curt I’m not talking to him anymore!

    😁Mar 14, 2019, 3:46 PMMoritz BierlingAlex BeltechiMar 14, 2019, 5:20 PMDermot DanielDo you think any of them fancy Greek characters are going to help when your head is stuffed into a toilet bowl?Mar 14, 2019, 7:39 PMCurt DoolittleI live to upset you. Seriously. first thing I do in the morning is ask “How am I gonna screw with Heywood today?” Surprising how often I’m successful…. lolzMar 14, 2019, 7:54 PMNick Heywood😆😄😆😄😆😄Mar 14, 2019, 9:41 PMRadu M Oleniuc>resist entropy.

    https://www.facebook.com/oleniuc/posts/10157112460746565Mar 14, 2019, 10:07 PMMichael ChurchillCurt can you actually understand what that equation says?Mar 14, 2019, 11:13 PMCurt Doolittleyeah – at least roughly – and so could everyone else if it was written in english instead of notation. But technically speaking it’s wrong ( or ‘imprecise’) and meant only to demonstrate that we sorta got it all. the illustration is just the best one I know of that describes ‘everything’Mar 14, 2019, 11:22 PMCurt DoolittleMar 14, 2019, 11:31 PMMichael ChurchillI am at a loss.Mar 14, 2019, 11:32 PMMichael ChurchillThough impressed.Mar 14, 2019, 11:35 PMCurt Doolittlei cant understand it either…Mar 14, 2019, 11:37 PMWilliam L. BengeRight or wrong these (formulas) still beat “infinite sets.”Mar 15, 2019, 1:43 AMYiannis KontinopoulosNot really, if you think of the imaginary number as a function, an operationMar 15, 2019, 9:26 AMJesse Charles Tatsuoka FolsomPhysics merely describes physical behavior, with extrapolation from mathematical consistencies contributing the bulk of our “understanding”, limited by human perception, language, reason, and imagination. Many distortions occur, even (maybe especially) among scientists, because of “is”. The reification of space and time springs to mind. Many of the recent “discoveries” of physics rely entirely on vast mathematical extrapolation overlaid on instrumentally-measured variables at distances and scales we cannot hope to do any actual experiments with any time soon.

    I have my doubts.Mar 17, 2019, 5:27 PMCurt Doolittle^those are just words with nothing to test. The grammar and vocabulary of science is operational. As far as I know we are at the closure of the fundamental rules. we cannot find a single example otherwise. All we know is that we are misinterpreting something very small, at very large scales. Recent suggestions are narrowing us down. But to make vague claims is nonsense.

    Utnil this year I was questioning whether the fundamental approach to particles was wrong, but it isn’t. Its just that we don’t know of a model for thining about it other than particles or ‘information’ when we probably should think about the universe more fluidlly.Mar 17, 2019, 5:46 PMJesse Charles Tatsuoka FolsomOkay, here’s something theoretically testable. The largest extant land animal is the African elephant, with the largest verified individual animal ever weighing in at 11.5 tons. Elephants are heavy-bodied, with columnar legs and large, fibrous, shock-absorbing pads in their feet. They are incapable of jumping at all. All the largest land animals, including rhinos and hippos, have similarly columnar legs, despite having maximum verifiable sizes more like 4 tons.

    Compare this to the Tyrannosaurus rex, a creature whose weight was considered to be comparable to the African elephant, with estimates averaging up to 15.4 tons. And this creature walked on two legs like a bird. Its relatively tiny arms could have been of almost no assistance. This is to say nothing of the largest relatively complete sauropods, that walked on four legs but had estimated weights up to 85 tons, with incomplete specimens speculated to reach as high as 243 tons. Such sizes have no close comparisons among any terrestrial animals.

    I question whether biological materials would actually be capable of supporting such titanic land animals under current gravitational conditions. The square cube law applies to muscles, tendons, and bones. But this is testable. Could we need merely make a model T-rex skeleton and try to move it around with plausible configurations of muscle and connective tissue, and see how well it holds up. If it turns out there is a conceivable biological configuration that makes dinosaurs possible under current gravitational conditions, well, current theories are safe, at least from this angle. If not, if dinosaurs could not exist under current gravitational conditions, than they did not exist under such conditions, and I know of no conventional physics that could explain much disparity in this area.Mar 17, 2019, 6:33 PMCurt DoolittleUm. it’s simple math. Which is why they do the math.Andthe math says they were pretty damned good at it. Furthermore, oxygen levels are lower today than during the triassic, and maintaining a cold blooded animals far cheaper than mammals.

    So unless you can do the math you shouldn’t have any opinion. Go learn the math.Mar 17, 2019, 6:57 PMJesse Charles Tatsuoka FolsomNo, it’s not simple math. It’s enormously complex math. Biological systems are incredible layers of complexity all the way down. And that’s why you can’t just do the math, and why so much of modern science is so questionable. Because it’s not science at all, it’s mathematical extrapolation, switching back and forth between equation and speculation. Why does dark matter exist? Because we believe the universe keeps its structure through gravity and there just isn’t enough observable mass, so thus we must have unobservable mass. Because the math says it must be there.

    Math is only as good as your beginning assumptions. If to then. Experiment, however, exists in the real world, not the relations of human symbols, and as such takes into account the variables we didn’t, sometimes couldn’t, take into account. The map is not the territory, language is just a map of the actual, and math is just a language that, at its origin, was about just about counting similar objects. It certainly has its utility, but the true scientific method cannot rely on it alone. It must ground itself in experiment or you risk hubris, assuming the workings of your mind to be equal to the workings of the universe. You seem like a smart guy, Curt, but I don’t think that’s the case. That is why the original scientific method required experiment, and I’m not sure exactly where it went.

    Mathematics are the pilpul of science, change my mind :PMar 17, 2019, 9:36 PMCurt Doolittleyou didn’t make an argument stating the failure of their mathematics. you just cast aspersions at it.

    I spend a great deal of my time writing about the difference between pseudoscience and science.

    If you had a criticism you’d make one.Mar 17, 2019, 10:29 PMMn RickThis is better than the number one sleep aide on the market by far 😶Mar 17, 2019, 11:34 PMAs far as I know we are very close to submission to the inescapable necessity, that the physics of the universe at existential scale is complete, and that no forces or interactions exist or can that we do not know of.

    Moreover that modifying our ‘stories’ such that they, our experiences, our thoughts, and actions work ever closer to those rules. In other words, a majority of people demonstrate preference for the results even if a minority demonstrate preference for what produces those results.

    Worse, that we evolved our language, cooperation in a division of labor, and all our works, in a period of very short ‘safety’ here on this earth, and here in this place in the universe. We do not have any luxury of ‘free riding’ on this world or the universe.

    But it is this particular difference between those of us who seek to consume(relax) above all else, and those of us who seek to produce(achieve) above all else, that separates our understanding of the world.

    As far as I can determine, we all seek to create stories that are discordant with that universe for a host of reasons – all of which are reducible to our desires being contrary to it.

    Because we survive and prosper by the same means as does all life: the seizure of opportunity to resist entropy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 10:40:00 UTC

  • The possible: Engineering The good: Philosophy The true: Law

    The possible: Engineering
    The good: Philosophy
    The true: Law


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-12 15:56:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105497898438012928

  • The possible: Engineering The good: Philosophy The true: Law

    The possible: Engineering

    The good: Philosophy

    The true: Law


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-12 11:56:00 UTC