photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54800060_10157071789092264_8674060434254331904_o_10157071789087264.jpg CONSTITUTION
One Step Closer Every DayLan KenSent you a DM.Mar 25, 2019, 10:39 AMCONSTITUTION
One Step Closer Every Day
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 10:23:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55505696_10157071686842264_2725091547413479424_o_10157071686837264.jpg Now, if laws were constructed in this form and in operational language, (including the tests of reciprocity and limits as well) ….Steve PenderAlgorithmic law for eventual AI law enforcementMar 25, 2019, 9:57 AMJWarren PrescottAfter 30 years of writing, reading and using engineering specifications, I appreciate precise language. Engineering specs have to transfer complex information that must be understood by not just other engineers, but salesmen, expeditors, purchasing, inspectors and the craft. We have to take upper-tier specifications and create procedures, purchase orders and numerous other documents. There is a clear hierarchy and revisions to specifications supersede the previous revisions.
Unfortunately, the current method used in writing the law is inherently irrational and confusing. It is a hodgepodge of overlapping statutory laws, regulations, procedures, ordinances that is all but impossible to unravel. It is as if lawyers created for themselves a system that excluded even the educated from logical discourse.
For example, I can create a living trust in one state and it not be valid in another – because HOW it was written – by lawyers… But the same lawyers can (for a fee) reword the trust so it has the “right” words for their state. One would think that if the lawyers could interpret the original trust, a judge could.Mar 25, 2019, 10:26 AMAaron BradleyWhat a breath of fresh air…Mar 25, 2019, 5:43 PMNow, if laws were constructed in this form and in operational language, (including the tests of reciprocity and limits as well) ….
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 09:30:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 17:02:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54520275_10157065187647264_1620923706937180160_o_10157065187637264.jpg THE LIMITS OF THE LAW
–“We say only that which is false and irreciprocal. It is up to those others to decide, from those alternatives that remain, what is GOOD and not FALSE.’– MILITUM DE IURIS NATURAE
That is the province of the law.THE LIMITS OF THE LAW
–“We say only that which is false and irreciprocal. It is up to those others to decide, from those alternatives that remain, what is GOOD and not FALSE.’– MILITUM DE IURIS NATURAE
That is the province of the law.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 12:52:00 UTC
Great Britain has the crown: The ‘judge of last resort’
Make an imperial parliament for imperial matters just as we should have, which would have prevented the american revolution. Put it in London instead of NY and let ‘gravity’ run its course.
And watch Europe shudder at the consequence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 10:18:00 UTC
TERMS of LAW: SUMMARY EXECUTION
A summary execution is an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_execution
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-21 20:17:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108824915006771200
TERMS of LAW: SUMMARY EXECUTION
A summary execution is an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_execution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_execution
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-21 16:16:00 UTC
CAESAR’S LAW
I do not speak for gods, whether your god, mine, or any others’. I speak for Caesar: the Law. I do not speak of faith but law.
–“Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”–
One speaks to god of faith. One speaks to Caesar of truth. If one cannot distinguish between that which is faith and that which is truth, and that which is unto caesar and that which is unto god, then one must refrain from that which he cannot speak without breaking either caesar’s or gods laws.
The spirit may choose to serve on god, many gods, or no gods. But one’s words and deeds exist in caesar’s world not your gods, another’s’, or any.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 15:43:00 UTC
IF YOU TAKE THESE COURSES
LAW103 – Foundations: The Method,
LAW203 – Application: Opinions, Arguments, and Law
LAW213 – Reformation: Human Knowledge Reform
LAW303 – Reconstruction (and Constitution)
By the end of LAW203
You will be able to construct every significant moral issue of the day in rigorous form just as I posed on Pedophilia yesterday.
By the end of LAW213 you will understand ‘what’s wrong’ with all the fields including education, and how to repair them.
By the end of LAW303 you will be able to write a constitution for your ‘recommended’ (Preferred) form of government.
If you also take HIST106 – The History of the European Peoples you will have the narrative structure to explain why.
If you also take ECON103 and ECON203 you will understand economics as a social science such that it is much easier to practice NATURAL LAW.
This is a METHODOLOGY. it takes a little practice but the methodology can be taught, such that you can write ‘decisions’ and ‘arguments’ in natural law.
(PS: FYI: I have condensed Epistemology and Argument into a single course: Foundations: LAW103/6. This was possible because of the simplification of the method once i put the material into class form.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 11:21:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54519137_10157060490037264_7286652694746365952_o_10157060490027264.jpg FROM LAW103 – FoundationsFROM LAW103 – Foundations
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 09:17:00 UTC