(FB 1544308437 Timestamp) WE BEAR THE BURDEN Under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law. We bear the burden. We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule (worth repeating)
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544306457 Timestamp) A PROFOUND LESSON IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING —“Curt, First of all, I’ll correct a point you make that is actually mistaken. It’s commonly made by leftists in connection with the First Amendment: …”The rule of law does not protect the people other than it limits the state, under the courts, to actions permitted in the constitution…”… No, it also obliges the state to protect its citizens from infringement of rights posed by others. … Two, the constitution is not absolutist. It is not law that encodes in itself as law indelibility. That being said, although I am not a constitutional law expert, I believe that it does enshrine a set of principles that cannot be controverted by subseqâ¦See More —“…rule of law…obliges the state..”—- Does it? Read the constitution and find that. You wont. And its very interesting that you wont. The inference is in the preamble, and in the second paragraph of the declaration. Why? under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law. We bear the burden. We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule. The rule the left has sought to restore. By circumventing the constitution via the weakness in it: the supreme court’s ability to make law. “Every man a citizen, a sheriff, a warrior, a sovereign”. We are not continental serfs, or obliged britons. We are americans – and the state but a service like any other we consume. and if that is no longer the case, then we are equally permitted under our declaration and constitution to replace this government which restores our rule and revokes rule from that government-become-ruler. Curt Doolittle
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544308437 Timestamp) WE BEAR THE BURDEN Under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law. We bear the burden. We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule (worth repeating)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544306457 Timestamp) A PROFOUND LESSON IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING —“Curt, First of all, I’ll correct a point you make that is actually mistaken. It’s commonly made by leftists in connection with the First Amendment: …”The rule of law does not protect the people other than it limits the state, under the courts, to actions permitted in the constitution…”… No, it also obliges the state to protect its citizens from infringement of rights posed by others. … Two, the constitution is not absolutist. It is not law that encodes in itself as law indelibility. That being said, although I am not a constitutional law expert, I believe that it does enshrine a set of principles that cannot be controverted by subseqâ¦See More —“…rule of law…obliges the state..”—- Does it? Read the constitution and find that. You wont. And its very interesting that you wont. The inference is in the preamble, and in the second paragraph of the declaration. Why? under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law. We bear the burden. We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule. The rule the left has sought to restore. By circumventing the constitution via the weakness in it: the supreme court’s ability to make law. “Every man a citizen, a sheriff, a warrior, a sovereign”. We are not continental serfs, or obliged britons. We are americans – and the state but a service like any other we consume. and if that is no longer the case, then we are equally permitted under our declaration and constitution to replace this government which restores our rule and revokes rule from that government-become-ruler. Curt Doolittle
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544709447 Timestamp) INCARCERATION RATES IN CONTEXT OF TIME AND PLACE There is a reason we are {a high trust society, a prosperous society, a ‘diverse’ society, a rule of law society, and a high incarceration society}. While we might question the utility of imprisoning people over some drug use, we do not have levels of petty crime endemic to european countries, as well as the pervasive crime that troubles the rest of the world. And the violent crime we have is {drug related, race-restricted, and race-location-restricted} because proximity creates hostility. So, in other words, the cost of preservation of our relatively superior condition is high rates of incarceration, and the subsequent increased risk those who have been incarcerated face, and the subsequent grouping-together, and monitoring of those what have been incarcerated with those who are at risk, into areas that can be monitored. If we were to secede into racially exclusive and racially heterogeneous polities, then we would, as a consequence, also secede into high trust, high income, high commons, low crime polities, and lower trust, poorer, low commons, lower crime polities. Because groups would produce appropriate signals, behavior, manners, ethics, morals, commons, policies, and laws – and only enforce those laws suitable for their populations. White crime in america is not dissimilar from white europe. Although white under, lower, and working class intermixture with the non-white underclasses is causing defection from the middle class values we have spent 1500 years developing, and degeneration of those whites is accelerating. The data is what it is: we have lower testosterone in white groups, and greater neoteny (we mature more slowly), and higher IQ distributions, and testosterone and rapid maturity and lower IQ distributions create demand for more criminal behavior. East asians have lower demand for stimulation and lower demand for identity expression (greater conformity). This is because we have selected for heroism and identity, and they for harmony and conformity for all of known history. So we see as good or better performance from east asians as we do from our own. Strangely, Latinos have similar levels of testosterone, slightly lower neoteny, but still lower distributions of IQ, so their excessive criminality is due to only one of the biological factors, while africans to three factors of developmental differences. Given sufficient IQ, neoteny and testosterone can somewhat be ameliorated. But that is not possible without positive eugenics in the short term or negative eugenics in the long. Incarceration is visible but the smallest consequence of forced integration. We have lost so much of our civil society, our commons, our manners, ethics and morals, due to attempts at heterogeneous polities. You have to go to norway today to experience the difference. Finns are ‘different’, so they are an unfair comparison. But the germanic peoples all together from italy to norway were a very special people before forced integration. And this century has been a curse for us for reasons some of us fully understand. The freed slaves precisely the damage the protestants warned against. The catholics were precisely the political damage the protestants warned against. The jews were ten times the damage the protestants warned against. The opening of immigration by the left in 65, as ten times the damage the protestants and catholics warned against. The experiment has failed. Democracy failed. Globalism failed. The belief that people were oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated like all other animals failed. We debate whether we domesticated the dog, or it domesticated itself. We do not face the rather obvious genetic evidence, that we domesticated ourselves. And that we did so by some groups being more domesticated and therefore better organized and cooperative than others.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544808083 Timestamp) ANARCHISM OR RULE OF LAW (NOMOCRACY)? One cannot both advocate for a uniform definition of property, and argue for anarchy. Hence why I argue for nomocracy: the natural law of reciprocity = the law of tort = the law of property = discovered by the resolution of demonstrated conflict = decided by tests of involuntary transfer.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544807368 Timestamp) IF IT WAS COMMON SENSE WE WOULDN’T NEED THE WHITE LAW —“I follow Curt, but most of what heâs says seems like common sense.”— A Friend (from Chat) So yes. It is f–cking common sense. The difference is that I defend that common sense both logically and scientifically, because what is ‘common sense’ to you ‘is not common’. I made a Law of what you consider ‘common sense’. It is that law, the constitution that embodies it, and the logic and science in defense of it, that make it open to utility in persuasion, resistance to falsification, and institutional implementation, rather than simply a difference of moral bias and condition. I wrote our law. No one ever did that before. We just ‘do it’. For thousands of years. Individual Sovereignty, Truth, Duty (and charity), The Natural law of Reciprocity (Tort), the Sovereignty Judge and the Jury, and markets in everything that result. The Militia of a distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544805739 Timestamp) A RELIGION WITHOUT CLERGY – A MILITIA RATHER THAN ARMY – A GOVERNMENT OF LAW NOT MEN. —“History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government” and “[i]n every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.”— Thomas Jefferson —“The Distributed Dictatorship of Sovereign Men”— Eli Harman
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544808083 Timestamp) ANARCHISM OR RULE OF LAW (NOMOCRACY)? One cannot both advocate for a uniform definition of property, and argue for anarchy. Hence why I argue for nomocracy: the natural law of reciprocity = the law of tort = the law of property = discovered by the resolution of demonstrated conflict = decided by tests of involuntary transfer.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544807368 Timestamp) IF IT WAS COMMON SENSE WE WOULDN’T NEED THE WHITE LAW —“I follow Curt, but most of what heâs says seems like common sense.”— A Friend (from Chat) So yes. It is f–cking common sense. The difference is that I defend that common sense both logically and scientifically, because what is ‘common sense’ to you ‘is not common’. I made a Law of what you consider ‘common sense’. It is that law, the constitution that embodies it, and the logic and science in defense of it, that make it open to utility in persuasion, resistance to falsification, and institutional implementation, rather than simply a difference of moral bias and condition. I wrote our law. No one ever did that before. We just ‘do it’. For thousands of years. Individual Sovereignty, Truth, Duty (and charity), The Natural law of Reciprocity (Tort), the Sovereignty Judge and the Jury, and markets in everything that result. The Militia of a distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.