(FB 1542215617 Timestamp) PETERSON IS AN INDIVIDUALIST NOT SOVEREIGNTARIAN (a) Individual Sovereignty = Individualism in LAW (in fact) not in ‘sentiment’ or ‘moralism’. Because only individuals can act. (b) The purpose of policy is the service of the INTERGENERATIONAL FAMILY, and NOT the individual. This is the hole in Classical Liberalism, Liberalism and LIbertarianism, for the simple reason that “one man one vote’ meant ‘one family with property one vote’ or ‘one business man one vote’ or ‘one familial corporation one vote’, and not ‘ one individual without demonstrated ability to produce one vote’. The priority of western civilization was and if it is to survive, must consist, in the combination of individual normative heroism, individual legal sovereignty, and the policy that gives all possible advantages to each individual intergenerational family, in its production of individual sovereigns. The word “individualism” masks this difference.
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542215617 Timestamp) PETERSON IS AN INDIVIDUALIST NOT SOVEREIGNTARIAN (a) Individual Sovereignty = Individualism in LAW (in fact) not in ‘sentiment’ or ‘moralism’. Because only individuals can act. (b) The purpose of policy is the service of the INTERGENERATIONAL FAMILY, and NOT the individual. This is the hole in Classical Liberalism, Liberalism and LIbertarianism, for the simple reason that “one man one vote’ meant ‘one family with property one vote’ or ‘one business man one vote’ or ‘one familial corporation one vote’, and not ‘ one individual without demonstrated ability to produce one vote’. The priority of western civilization was and if it is to survive, must consist, in the combination of individual normative heroism, individual legal sovereignty, and the policy that gives all possible advantages to each individual intergenerational family, in its production of individual sovereigns. The word “individualism” masks this difference.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542289756 Timestamp) THREE IMPORTANT IDEAS: (1. I’m not the same as my online persona, 2. I’m restoring violence to the discourse in order to teach the law, and 3. the law I have written recasts libertarians as the judges of the commons.) Stellar conversation with James Fox Higgins this morning. 100 minutes. Can’t wait to share it whenever he releases it. I learned a few things that I need to get across to the audience.
- Um. Please be respectful just to maintain my incentive to invest heavily in being available, but do no not be afraid of me. I am very conscious of what I am doing. When I argue online i’m acting as a judge and prosecutor on one hand, and a disciplinarian of rowdy boys on the other. I am more accommodating as a CEO and even more so as an ordinary guy in conversation. My online personality is my JOB. It is not ME. I am very different in my roles as conversationalist, CEO in business, theoretician-professor, and Prosecutor-Judge.
I am very consciously restoring violence to the discourse, and a lot of my persona and positioning is to do so. Obscuring the fact that violence to force people into markest is the origin of that order we call civilization. It’s not that I enjoy or advocate violence, It’s that upon entry of women in the the political and commercial arena we overly-softened the fact that it is violence alone that creates it, and that the non-violent are RIDERS on that order created by that violence. Conversely, a very small number of men can easily alter the status quo – and have, for millennia.
One of the reasons I set out to destroy the libertarian movement is to restore it to leadership of the conservative movement, by eliminating the attraction of the pacifist narrative of the rothbardian (common property marxist) message. In other words, I worked to deny libertarians the field of ideology and return them to the field of law. Biologically and socially, libertarians serve as the JUDICIAL minority between feminine consumptive, and male conservative genetic interests, by insuring that trade is remained. I WROTE THE BOOK OF LAW TO MAKE THAT JUDGEMENT POSSIBLE. Ergo, I need to drive libertarians into roles as JUDGES of the LAW, under european high trust “commons” law, not semitic low trust “ghetto” law. And that is what my work does: I wrote THE LAW. The one law of reciprocity from which western civilization evolved and out-competed other civilizations in rates of adaptation and innovation.
Cheers Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542909901 Timestamp) LAW CHANGES HUMAN BEHAVIOUR FIRST. SOCIAL SHAMING SECOND, REWARD THIRD. by Bill Joslin Law changes human behaviour first. Social shaming second, reward third. Subsumed in a world of business people who manage by leaning on the crutch of “incentives”(bonuses, commissions etc) I’m often aghast at how blind they are to the strength of disincentives in average workers. People, when under stress, will gladly take on opportunity costs to avoid pain (lose that bonus to avoid the continual abuse of a shitty client). We’re wired to avoid costs and mitigate risk almost to the point of death. When disincentives are suppressed (when we’re trained to behave properly), incentives come into play.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542909901 Timestamp) LAW CHANGES HUMAN BEHAVIOUR FIRST. SOCIAL SHAMING SECOND, REWARD THIRD. by Bill Joslin Law changes human behaviour first. Social shaming second, reward third. Subsumed in a world of business people who manage by leaning on the crutch of “incentives”(bonuses, commissions etc) I’m often aghast at how blind they are to the strength of disincentives in average workers. People, when under stress, will gladly take on opportunity costs to avoid pain (lose that bonus to avoid the continual abuse of a shitty client). We’re wired to avoid costs and mitigate risk almost to the point of death. When disincentives are suppressed (when we’re trained to behave properly), incentives come into play.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1543163162 Timestamp) IT BEGINS WITH THE OATH https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/16/it-begins-with-the-oath/
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1543163111 Timestamp) THE OATH
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543194668 Timestamp) (worth repeating) —As members of cults we are always in conflict over the legal systems under them, since those legal systems are arbitrary means of advocating different group evolutionary strategies of cooperation – all of which, under religion, despite their early utility, evolved to be more hinderance than good. As member of the Love of Man, of our Peoples, In nation-states, producing commons suitable to our needs, we are not enemies but allies in a division of labor producing the transcendence of man. If there is a better religion than that I do not know what it is. But it is the one I am proposing. A religion of the love and transcendence of man into gods, not into the subjects of priests and politicians, investors and industrialists.—
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543195780 Timestamp) THE CONFLATION AND EXAGGERATION OF CRIMINAL DATABASES POLITICAL They have screwed up the terrorist database by conflating terrorism with rebellion, insurrection, and crime. (Political) SOCIAL They have screwed up the mass shootings database by conflating family murders with social wrath. (Social) PSYCHOLOGICAL They have screwed up the serial killer database by conflating the repeatedly violent or commit multiple acts with those who develop plans for killing in and of itself. (Psychological) SEXUAL They have screwed up the sex crimes database by conflating uncontrollable risk with controllable risk crimes. (Sexual) CRIMINAL They have screwed up the criminal database by conflating crimes the crimes by severity of punishment rather than motive and risk. (Criminal) WHITE COLLAR They have all but licensed white collar and informational crime on scales that is terrifying. ( Fraud ) INFLATION IS EVERYWHERE BY MEANS OF CONFLATION
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543194668 Timestamp) (worth repeating) —As members of cults we are always in conflict over the legal systems under them, since those legal systems are arbitrary means of advocating different group evolutionary strategies of cooperation – all of which, under religion, despite their early utility, evolved to be more hinderance than good. As member of the Love of Man, of our Peoples, In nation-states, producing commons suitable to our needs, we are not enemies but allies in a division of labor producing the transcendence of man. If there is a better religion than that I do not know what it is. But it is the one I am proposing. A religion of the love and transcendence of man into gods, not into the subjects of priests and politicians, investors and industrialists.—