A CONSTITUTION
(work in progress)
https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/revolution-the-introduction/a-new-constitution/
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-28 14:38:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133382031503699968
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
A CONSTITUTION (work in progress)
-
Libertarianism is fraud. It’s an excuse to selectively measure economic phenomen
Libertarianism is fraud. It’s an excuse to selectively measure economic phenomenon. Liberty: Rule of Law, meaning Tort, under Individual Sovereignty, and Universal Standing, and Universal Application, prohibits the sophistry of parasitism that libertarianism sought to introduce.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-27 21:04:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133116690185826305
Reply addressees: @dunkruger @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133073318033154049
IN REPLY TO:
@rationalposts
@StefanMolyneux Here’s my conundrum. to understand libertarian like platforms/concepts, that means ~ 4 to 5% via the bell curve qualify to understand it to vote for it.
This accounts for why libertarians routinely get no more than 4 to 5% of the vote.
How do we get there by voting?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133073318033154049
-
I have spent the past five or six years on producing a law restoring western civ
I have spent the past five or six years on producing a law restoring western civilization, and ‘desensitizing’ the thought of revolution, how it is conducted, the vulnerability of the USA to revolution, and the deterministic eventuality of civil war, revolt, or conquest.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-26 11:06:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132603854124650502
Reply addressees: @WhiteDrake14 @HcJoachim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132554329888440321
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132554329888440321
-
In any given King of the Hill game, there is a difference between The Law – a vi
In any given King of the Hill game, there is a difference between The Law – a via negativa, Personal choice, and Public Choice – a via positiva.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-25 16:53:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132328791299284992
-
Until it’s time to use just violence and break unjust laws – as a group
Until it’s time to use just violence and break unjust laws – as a group.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-21 14:10:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1130838259515502592
Reply addressees: @Gunmap1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1130830086071099392
IN REPLY TO:
@Gunmap1
@curtdoolittle Defend our culture as aggressively as possible w/o violence or breaking the law.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1130830086071099392
-
Suspect it will be reviewed and cancelled. That said, I have alts, twitter, gab,
Suspect it will be reviewed and cancelled. That said, I have alts, twitter, gab, and the Institute. But I might organize a Class Action, given that this is what it was created for, rather than commercial liability.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-21 14:09:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1130838079009431552
Reply addressees: @seapad6
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1130836948245929984
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1130836948245929984
-
“I want to build a judiciary to decide natural law (Truth). Not a political ideo
–“I want to build a judiciary to decide natural law (Truth). Not a political ideology to influence democracy.”– Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-19 21:12:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1130219791820546054
-
“I want to build a judiciary to decide natural law (truth). Not a political ideo
–“I want to build a judiciary to decide natural law (truth). Not a political ideology to influence democracy.”–cd
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-19 16:45:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1130152424298074112
-
Not just gun rights, but explicitly state their purpose
Not just gun rights, but explicitly state their purpose….
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-17 13:58:02 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10651668257298461
-
Rules are for people who need them. Unfortunately, all but a few of us need them
Rules are for people who need them. Unfortunately, all but a few of us need them.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-17 13:11:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129373970732650497