Yes it is the New Constitution that will and does sell normies, NOT Propertarianism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-20 20:37:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1141807414699876352
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
“in the later Middle Ages, canonists and civilians expressed … the dictum: ‘Th
—“in the later Middle Ages, canonists and civilians expressed … the dictum: ‘The monarch is below natural law, but above positive law’.”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-20 02:08:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1141528133742579712
-
Silly people practice socio political Luddism. Some of us adapt legal technology
Silly people practice socio political Luddism. Some of us adapt legal technology to suit incentives.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:14:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140050028184121349
Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140049698105036800
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BagleyDevon Serial monogamy is our evolutionary state. Farming and animal husbandry gradually replaced it under multigenerational families. Absolute nuclear families the result of capital accumulation. We no longer have incentives: the pill, redistribution, heavy taxes, no fault divorce.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140049698105036800
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@BagleyDevon Serial monogamy is our evolutionary state. Farming and animal husbandry gradually replaced it under multigenerational families. Absolute nuclear families the result of capital accumulation. We no longer have incentives: the pill, redistribution, heavy taxes, no fault divorce.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140049698105036800
-
Women initiate more than 2/3 of divorces. College educated women 90%. Current le
Women initiate more than 2/3 of divorces. College educated women 90%. Current legislation prevents rotation of men into healthy families. Favors women overwhelmingly, and destroys men’s familial, social, economic, retirement security. Men with the children remarry. Women not.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-15 23:56:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140045367259664385
Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140016371503255552
IN REPLY TO:
@BagleyDevon
@curtdoolittle 1) Rationality is not exactly some peoples strength. This creates incentive for men to divorce women. 2) Men do this already regardless of obligations to children. 3) Current legislation favors fathers bearing half of child rearing responsibility. Punishes uninvolved fathers.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140016371503255552
-
Well, I know of laws of nature (physical), natural law (necessity), findings of
Well, I know of laws of nature (physical), natural law (necessity), findings of law by jurists (pragmatic), legislation and command (arbitrary, or utilitarian). What law were you referring to?
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 22:53:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137492956162772992
Reply addressees: @PRO__UNLIMITED
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137487034262667269
-
THE CHOICE OF THE CONSEQUENCE OF LAW —“The way I think of it, we have a choice
THE CHOICE OF THE CONSEQUENCE OF LAW
—“The way I think of it, we have a choice to enforce the law in a controlled manner or it will enforce itself with much collateral damage. But it is the law, there’s no long-term escaping it.”—Martin Štěpán
(perfect)
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 18:24:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137425260658081793
-
YOU CAN NOW REGISTER FOR COURSES AND START LAW103-FOUNDATIONS
YOU CAN NOW REGISTER FOR COURSES AND START LAW103-FOUNDATIONS.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-03 14:22:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1135552293766664193
-
If we put 1000 guys thru JUST the Foundations law course and the world will shak
If we put 1000 guys thru JUST the Foundations law course and the world will shake. These fking guys make the jesuits look like candystripers. Damn….
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-01 20:05:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134913809376731137
-
7) A formal constitution of strict construction. Rule of law of Tort (reciprocit
7) A formal constitution of strict construction. Rule of law of Tort (reciprocity).Universal standing and application. Mandatory Investment in productive commons. Shares in the economy as a monetary substitute. Continuous education. A universal militia, and an homogenous polity.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-31 16:11:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134492698050781185
Reply addressees: @SgtD_isBack @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134473337873158144
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134473337873158144
-
Its illegal for the military to operate on domestic soil. The national guard mig
Its illegal for the military to operate on domestic soil. The national guard might be deployed but its a tiny force – and besides, whose side do you think they are on, silly?
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-30 01:24:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133906877870460928
Reply addressees: @sjredmond
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133905980083904514
IN REPLY TO:
@sjredmond
@curtdoolittle Blah blah blah. You’re the first person the tanks will run over.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133905980083904514