Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • Can We Create A New Federalist Papers?

    TO: John Mark 1) I have the ‘last 30 day’ plan ready. It’s going to blow people away. But we can’t do it until next spring at the earliest. Just letting you know that it’s going to surprise people, it will bring in the people to act, and that combined with ‘hitting the road’ is going to work. I’m not going to talk about it until the last minute. 2) Is there a chance you would be willing to do a video per article of the constitution over the winter so that we get into a discussion like the federalist papers? i mean, interview style we walk through the constitution and we cover law and policy. This is what people will be interested in. I think this is waaaay too much to ask of you. So I’ll try to find someone else if you can’t, but I think a series of shorter videos on each article of teh constitution, including the declaration, preamble, man, and law is worth doing. it’ll end up being federalist papers set two and it might be the means by which we hit even more mainstream people.

    FROM John Mark [Y]es. I think it’s a fantastic idea. It would really help people understand it and drive home to them how advanced a stage it’s in (“this is real”). Doing short (or even, say 1-hr) videos with you interview/conversation style is actually way easier and much less time consuming than my normal style videos because there’s so much less video/image editing required (that’s the time-consuming part). If I can get my sound setup sorted out so that I don’t even have to adjust sound levels afterward, it’s easy.

  • Definition: Tzar (Tsar)

    Definition: Tzar (Tsar) https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/definition-tzar-tsar/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 20:30:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179856365734563866

  • Definition: Tzar (Tsar)

    Tsar (/zɑːr, sɑːr/ or /tsɑːr/; Old Church Slavonic: ц︢рь [usually written thus with a title] or цар, царь), also spelled csar, or tzar or czar, is a title used to designate East and South Slavic monarchs or supreme rulers of Eastern Europe, originally Bulgarian monarchs from 10th century onwards. As a system of government in the Tsardom of Russia and the Russian Empire, it is known as Tsarist autocracy, or Tsarism. The term is derived from the Latin word Caesar, which was intended to mean “Emperor” in the European medieval sense of the term—a ruler with the same rank as a Roman emperor, holding it by the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official (the Pope or the Ecumenical Patriarch)—but was usually considered by western Europeans to be equivalent to king, or to be somewhat in between a royal and imperial rank. Tsarist autocracy[a] (Russian: царское самодержавие, transcr. tsarskoye samoderzhaviye) is a form of autocracy (later absolute monarchy) specific to the Grand Duchy of Moscow, which later became Tsardom of Russia and the Russian Empire.[b] In it, all power and wealth is controlled (and distributed) by the Tsar. They had more power than constitutional monarchs, who are usually vested by law and counterbalanced by a legislative authority; they even had more authority on religious issues compared to Western monarchs. In Russia, it originated during the time of Ivan III (1440−1505), and was abolished after the Russian Revolution of 1917. West Europeans have had Kings, and Constitutional Monarchies but they were limited by traditional (customary) law.

  • Definition: Tzar (Tsar)

    Tsar (/zɑːr, sɑːr/ or /tsɑːr/; Old Church Slavonic: ц︢рь [usually written thus with a title] or цар, царь), also spelled csar, or tzar or czar, is a title used to designate East and South Slavic monarchs or supreme rulers of Eastern Europe, originally Bulgarian monarchs from 10th century onwards. As a system of government in the Tsardom of Russia and the Russian Empire, it is known as Tsarist autocracy, or Tsarism. The term is derived from the Latin word Caesar, which was intended to mean “Emperor” in the European medieval sense of the term—a ruler with the same rank as a Roman emperor, holding it by the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official (the Pope or the Ecumenical Patriarch)—but was usually considered by western Europeans to be equivalent to king, or to be somewhat in between a royal and imperial rank. Tsarist autocracy[a] (Russian: царское самодержавие, transcr. tsarskoye samoderzhaviye) is a form of autocracy (later absolute monarchy) specific to the Grand Duchy of Moscow, which later became Tsardom of Russia and the Russian Empire.[b] In it, all power and wealth is controlled (and distributed) by the Tsar. They had more power than constitutional monarchs, who are usually vested by law and counterbalanced by a legislative authority; they even had more authority on religious issues compared to Western monarchs. In Russia, it originated during the time of Ivan III (1440−1505), and was abolished after the Russian Revolution of 1917. West Europeans have had Kings, and Constitutional Monarchies but they were limited by traditional (customary) law.

  • The Outstanding Issue of The Second American Constitution

    The Outstanding Issue of The Second American Constitution https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/the-outstanding-issue-of-the-second-american-constitution/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 19:34:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179842054614114304

  • The Outstanding Issue of The Second American Constitution

    [T]he issue in the first american constitution was the exception of slavery. The issue in the second american constitution will be the exception of christianity. I’m just recording that this exception, like the first one, is necessary – but it will lead to the same problems, without a continuation of the reformation of christianity. We have at least Religious, Fascist, Traditional, Constitutional, Ratio-economic, and Scientific ‘factions’ that we must satisfy in order to form a more perfect union. Mine must sacrifice tolerance for christian abrahamism; the fascists must tolerate monarchy via negativa instead of a strong man via positiva; and the christians must tolerate the protestantization of christianity as a folk religion, the ongoing decline (3rd Worlding) of the catholic church, and our inability to restore churches to control of family law and education – in exchange for defense by the state, advocacy by the state, and competition between theological, moral, rational, and scientific practices of christianity and our ancient germanic and slavic religions of nature and the hearth. In exchange we all get restoration of our nation state(s), and the permanent destruction of the second abrahamic attack on western civilization – all civilization for that matter, by a monopoly religion within the state. HIERARCHY OF LAWS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION (TRUTH) … > Physical Laws … … > Heathen (Pagan) Law of War … … … > Natural Law of Cooperation: Reciprocity … … … … > Christian Law Of Investment in Cooperation

  • The Outstanding Issue of The Second American Constitution

    [T]he issue in the first american constitution was the exception of slavery. The issue in the second american constitution will be the exception of christianity. I’m just recording that this exception, like the first one, is necessary – but it will lead to the same problems, without a continuation of the reformation of christianity. We have at least Religious, Fascist, Traditional, Constitutional, Ratio-economic, and Scientific ‘factions’ that we must satisfy in order to form a more perfect union. Mine must sacrifice tolerance for christian abrahamism; the fascists must tolerate monarchy via negativa instead of a strong man via positiva; and the christians must tolerate the protestantization of christianity as a folk religion, the ongoing decline (3rd Worlding) of the catholic church, and our inability to restore churches to control of family law and education – in exchange for defense by the state, advocacy by the state, and competition between theological, moral, rational, and scientific practices of christianity and our ancient germanic and slavic religions of nature and the hearth. In exchange we all get restoration of our nation state(s), and the permanent destruction of the second abrahamic attack on western civilization – all civilization for that matter, by a monopoly religion within the state. HIERARCHY OF LAWS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION (TRUTH) … > Physical Laws … … > Heathen (Pagan) Law of War … … … > Natural Law of Cooperation: Reciprocity … … … … > Christian Law Of Investment in Cooperation

  • (b) rule of law and involuntary warranty must be extended from commercial goods

    (b) rule of law and involuntary warranty must be extended from commercial goods and services to all information in the marketplace. yes that’s right. We gave license to people to not warranty their words in the 20th, and that’s the reason we are where we are today. Period.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 15:38:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179782863631376385

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179782650346819585


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon So let me reduce Taleb’s life’s work as an essayist in ridicule of western civilization to its foundations: (a) Mandelbrot was right that the stock market is just noise so w/o inside information just invest in funds. … (and here comes the big one) …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179782650346819585


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon So let me reduce Taleb’s life’s work as an essayist in ridicule of western civilization to its foundations: (a) Mandelbrot was right that the stock market is just noise so w/o inside information just invest in funds. … (and here comes the big one) …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179782650346819585

  • What taleb is attempting to obscure is west can create large complex organizatio

    What taleb is attempting to obscure is west can create large complex organizations because of trust and trust under rule of law, and rule of law by filtering out corruption granting privilege to IQ. He can’t face that because levantines cannot create trust, rule of law or …


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 15:14:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179776658791976960

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179776241542582273


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon West and east used tests successfully to filter out corruption for positions in government. Same for military, then same for academy. Wealth is available across the bell curve, with complexity (IQ) determining your market. You need conscientiousness to accumulate that wealth.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179776241542582273


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon West and east used tests successfully to filter out corruption for positions in government. Same for military, then same for academy. Wealth is available across the bell curve, with complexity (IQ) determining your market. You need conscientiousness to accumulate that wealth.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179776241542582273

  • Why did Rothbard (and Hoppe) choose intersubjectively verifiable property, rathe

    Why did Rothbard (and Hoppe) choose intersubjectively verifiable property, rather than the vast empirical evidence of law for thousands of years in so many civilizations? Why do you rely on a principle rather than a complete declarative and testable sentence (law)?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 20:43:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179497119603929088

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179494418317021184


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy That is why we should have a conversation – so that you can move on. It’s the conversation many have asked us to have. Start: What is the market demand for definition of morality categorized as property, sufficient to resolve disputes vs end in retaliation cycles? For Polities?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179494418317021184


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy That is why we should have a conversation – so that you can move on. It’s the conversation many have asked us to have. Start: What is the market demand for definition of morality categorized as property, sufficient to resolve disputes vs end in retaliation cycles? For Polities?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179494418317021184