Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • JURY > ASSEMBLY > SENATE > LEGISLATURE A thing was a governing assembly in early

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thing_(assembly)THING(THANG,DING): JURY > ASSEMBLY > SENATE > LEGISLATURE

    A thing was a governing assembly in early Germanic society, made up of the free people of the community presided over by law-speakers.

    The word appears in Old Norse, Old English, and modern Icelandic as þing, in Middle English (as in modern English), Old Saxon, Old Dutch, and Old Frisian as thing, in German as Ding, and in modern Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Faroese, Gutnish, and Norn as ting, all from a reconstructed Proto-Germanic neuter *þingą; the word is the same as the more common English word thing, both having at their heart the basic meaning of “an assemblage, a coming together of parts”—in the one case, an “assembly” or “meeting”, in the other, an “entity”, “object”, or “thing”. The meeting-place of a thing was called a “thingstead” (Old English þingstede) or “thingstow” (Old English þingstōw).

    The Anglo-Saxon folkmoot (Old English folcgemōt, “folk meeting”; Middle English folkesmōt; modern Norwegian folkemøte) was analogous, the forerunner to the witenagemōt and a precursor of the modern Parliament of the United Kingdom.

    Today the term lives on in the English term hustings, in the official names of national legislatures and political and judicial institutions of Nordic countries and, in the Manx form tyn, as a term for the three legislative bodies on the Isle of Man.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thing_(assembly)Updated Nov 6, 2019, 7:03 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 06:57:00 UTC

  • Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. Unless you write a constitution that engineer

    Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. Unless you write a constitution that engineers order and suppresses demand for authority, then you’re hand waving another NAP-lie.
    So say Rule of Law,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=500495630547332&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 23:33:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191861117406056448

  • Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. Unless you write a constitution that engineer

    Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. Unless you write a constitution that engineers order and suppresses demand for authority, then you’re hand waving another NAP-lie.
    So say Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Property-in-Toto, and then Commune, Oligarchy, Monarchy, or Despot.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 23:30:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191860408170233856

    Reply addressees: @I_Vae_Victis_I @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191851766792503297


    IN REPLY TO:

    @I_Vae_Victis_I

    Just because someone is a minarchist, doesn’t mean they’re a (ghetto ethics) libertarian.

    Left-wing pilpul has been conflating the two for a long time, on purpose.

    @curtdoolittle
    @JohnMarkSays

    #thomasjefferson #Propertarianism

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191851766792503297

  • Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. Unless you write a constitution that engineer

    Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. Unless you write a constitution that engineers order and suppresses demand for authority, then you’re hand waving another NAP-lie.

    So say Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Property-in-Toto, and then Commune, Oligarchy, Monarchy, or Despot, and then the means of revenue generation to pay for defense of territory externally, and defense of property internally with sheriff, and court , both of which are sufficient to deny competitors conquest. And then what comons will you produce and how will you pay for them, in order to attract trade, people, and opportunity, sufficient that neighboring ‘states’ do not conquer you as a parasite upon their economy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 18:33:00 UTC

  • Because THE LAW does not forgive ignorance of The Law, and when prosecution, res

    Because THE LAW does not forgive ignorance of The Law, and when prosecution, restitution, punishment, and prevention are soon restored, those who conspire, in ignorance or not, intent or not, willingly or not, shall be punished – all the same. And what restitution for genocide?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 14:05:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191718123872882694

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191717225029349377


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @StefanMolyneux So “I pray thee take heed” that you do not conspire, even in ignorance, regardless of your intentions, with ancient enemies, whose strategy is to incite monopoly, tyranny, irreciprocity, parasitism, ignorance, sophism, superstition, pseudoscience, and denial to destroy us AGAIN.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191717225029349377


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @StefanMolyneux So “I pray thee take heed” that you do not conspire, even in ignorance, regardless of your intentions, with ancient enemies, whose strategy is to incite monopoly, tyranny, irreciprocity, parasitism, ignorance, sophism, superstition, pseudoscience, and denial to destroy us AGAIN.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191717225029349377

  • And that includes prosecution of those who would cast that Fascism (Intolerance)

    And that includes prosecution of those who would cast that Fascism (Intolerance) as Immoral, Unethical, Undesirable, who by doing so conspires with our ancient enemies to Underming (Again) our great civilization, by granting license for fomentation of crimes against our people.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 13:58:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191716525625020417

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191715954608214016


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @StefanMolyneux So yes, I want, all moral men want, “Fascism” if “Fascism” is Rule of Law of Reciprocity, Markets in Everything, intolerance for Monopoly of Abrahamic undermining by parasitisms of universalism, judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism, and lying.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191715954608214016


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @StefanMolyneux So yes, I want, all moral men want, “Fascism” if “Fascism” is Rule of Law of Reciprocity, Markets in Everything, intolerance for Monopoly of Abrahamic undermining by parasitisms of universalism, judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism, and lying.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191715954608214016

  • One cannot morally argue against Rule of Law by Natural Law of Sovereignty and R

    One cannot morally argue against Rule of Law by Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, where the court and jury provide a market for punishment(court) in competition with the market for rewards(the market proper), & where exists a prohibition against imposition by arbitrage.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 13:47:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191713650509307905

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191712943597113344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @StefanMolyneux If FASCISM is: Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Sanctity of the Commons, The Intergenerational Family, Zero-Tolerance and Jury; Social, Economic,and Political Nationalism; State Credit, Investment, Returns on Industrial Capital; Pragmatic Autarky – that’s PERFECT GOV’T.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191712943597113344


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @StefanMolyneux If FASCISM is: Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Sanctity of the Commons, The Intergenerational Family, Zero-Tolerance and Jury; Social, Economic,and Political Nationalism; State Credit, Investment, Returns on Industrial Capital; Pragmatic Autarky – that’s PERFECT GOV’T.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191712943597113344

  • Our people can survive if you keep your mythology for the purpose of psychology,

    Our people can survive if you keep your mythology for the purpose of psychology, sociology and morality – the weak or feminine mind and body, but we must also have rule of law by natural law, ethics, economics, and politics for reality – the strong or masculine mind and body.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 00:20:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191510555741302784

    Reply addressees: @TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge @SamuelWhittemo4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191510124214542346


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge @SamuelWhittemo4 So this is why the jew rebelled, because they had discovered usury in babylon,and had built a culture as an organized crime syndicate, which still exists today – profiting from undermining peoples who can create commons by baiting idiots (like you) into hazard with false promise.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191510124214542346


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge @SamuelWhittemo4 So this is why the jew rebelled, because they had discovered usury in babylon,and had built a culture as an organized crime syndicate, which still exists today – profiting from undermining peoples who can create commons by baiting idiots (like you) into hazard with false promise.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191510124214542346

  • It was actually Romans who introduced capital punishment into europe. They weren

    It was actually Romans who introduced capital punishment into europe. They weren’t concerned with internal relations only relations between groups, protection of trade, and the cheapest way of insuring order.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 00:12:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191508670020030465

    Reply addressees: @TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge @SamuelWhittemo4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191508409830518784


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge @SamuelWhittemo4 Actually, there were only two crimes of capital punishment under our european law: cowardice in battle and adultery. Everything else required restitution only – to keep the peace. So “Sacrifice” was the excuse they used to kill off ‘troublemakers’ without violating The Law.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191508409830518784


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge @SamuelWhittemo4 Actually, there were only two crimes of capital punishment under our european law: cowardice in battle and adultery. Everything else required restitution only – to keep the peace. So “Sacrifice” was the excuse they used to kill off ‘troublemakers’ without violating The Law.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191508409830518784

  • Actually, there were only two crimes of capital punishment under our european la

    Actually, there were only two crimes of capital punishment under our european law: cowardice in battle and adultery. Everything else required restitution only – to keep the peace. So “Sacrifice” was the excuse they used to kill off ‘troublemakers’ without violating The Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 00:11:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191508409830518784

    Reply addressees: @TempletonViktor @SiliconEdge @SamuelWhittemo4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191507569174433792


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191507569174433792