One cannot morally argue against Rule of Law by Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, where the court and jury provide a market for punishment(court) in competition with the market for rewards(the market proper), & where exists a prohibition against imposition by arbitrage.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 13:47:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191713650509307905
Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191712943597113344
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@StefanMolyneux If FASCISM is: Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Sanctity of the Commons, The Intergenerational Family, Zero-Tolerance and Jury; Social, Economic,and Political Nationalism; State Credit, Investment, Returns on Industrial Capital; Pragmatic Autarky – that’s PERFECT GOV’T.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191712943597113344
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@StefanMolyneux If FASCISM is: Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Sanctity of the Commons, The Intergenerational Family, Zero-Tolerance and Jury; Social, Economic,and Political Nationalism; State Credit, Investment, Returns on Industrial Capital; Pragmatic Autarky – that’s PERFECT GOV’T.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191712943597113344
Leave a Reply