Well we’ve corrected that constitutional vulnerability as well as the seven others. We just need to show up and stay there until it’s enacted.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 17:53:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772320977633902748
Reply addressees: @FuryForth @COSAction
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772313725522882574
It is more like rule of law than all the alternatives combined. That a thing is best is not to say it is perfect. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-22 16:50:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771217860100047121
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @radiofreenw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771216824421531954
Yes to mandatory paternity testing – no question about it. Yes.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-21 02:56:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770645558719324284
The British Monarchy are too afraid, that given parliament are sovereign, not the people, or the constitution, or the natural law, that they would not survive – yet they are fully conscious of their import.
In other words it is up to us, the people, to save the monarchy in self defense, and to restore that power to the monarchy under the sovereignty of he people under the natural law and a constitution of natural law and NOT the parliament.
My work does explain why monarchy is necessary under natural law (partly thanks to Hoppe) as a judge of last resort given the frequent tendency of the passions of the people or the interests of the elites seek to undermine the natural law for present gain despite future catastrophe.
Reply addressees: @cavaller_humil
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-20 18:11:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770513609333878784
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770512521767592171
—“I think this court draws attention because of it’s insistence on following the constitution…. and subsequently forcing each of the branches of government to do it’s job. For too long we have allowed the executive branch to rule by “agencies”…. as each of these unelected agency heads make new rules that carry the weight of law. So, no longer do we need to win public approval for policies… we simply create “rules” from the chosen agency to form new law.”— James Syntax
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-19 16:48:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770130203223756800
Ah. So, is the body of law sufficient for the defense of the people from seduction deceit sedition and treason that destroys the people’s institutions and even genetics?
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-19 12:27:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770064673678712852
Reply addressees: @BlauGloriole @Brian_Barwinski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770064318177886533
There are six to eight holes in the constitution depending upon how you count them. Fix the holes. Prevent the feminine means of warfare and …. that’s it. The rest is policy reform to ‘correct’ the harms imposed.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:48:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769797942259445824
Reply addressees: @josh61597760 @ancientnatsoc
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769795942197149899
It (the enemy) is in fact, easy to defend against. I understand it’s tragic simplicity and why we in our heroism and Christianity are vulnerable to it. So, modifying our law to equally suppress the feminine means of evasion, deception, seduction, baiting into hazard,…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:29:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769793341112086592
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769787611759976561
Of course, my goal is to begin in the USA and then use the victory and the incentives to save Britain, restoring the anglosphere worldwide as a federation, with written constitution, and preservation of the monarchy as a judge of last resort. As far as I know, the scandinavian countries will follow, then the german, then the west slavic, and then possibly the latin, with france, because of her egoism last.
Reply addressees: @ancientnatsoc
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:03:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769786602174173186
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769780524640251911
We do not have a democracy.
We have a Constitutional Republic with Concurrent Voting for assent and Common Law for Dispute resolution. If you do not know what concurrency and Commonality mean, if you do not know what rule of law means, and if you do not know what a republic means you do not understand our government and how important, brilliant, and empirical it is.
Concurrency (agreemnt) between classes and regions.
Commonality (agreemnt) between courts in the resolution of differences across classes and regions.
Republic: (agreement) the combination of rule of law with elected representatives.
Rule of Law: (limits) all persons, institutions, and entities, public and private, including the state itself, are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced, and independently adjudicated – and in the Anglosphere, where legislation regulation and findings of the court must preserve natural law.
Natural Law: The Natural Law (Of Cooperation) requires preservation of self determination by self determined means, by individual sovereignty and demand for reciprocity in display word and deed.
Natural Rights, and Human rights are attempts to articulate natural law.
Reply addressees: @pmarca
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 04:36:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769221288625590272
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1768937779369853242