–“El ámbito del derecho es todo aquello por lo que la gente se puede pelear”–
Correcto. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-05 20:26:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765111790029910017
–“El ámbito del derecho es todo aquello por lo que la gente se puede pelear”–
Correcto. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-05 20:26:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765111790029910017
No. It’s a very clear point of constitutional law. It didn’t take much discussion. I’ll read all the opinions tonight or tomorrow. But as I stated before it’s obvious.
They also stated that they only referred to the most obvious issue – they didn’t even touch on the other issues. But I covered those issues in both interviews and posts in January.
The disturbing question here is why this even made it past a state supreme court. But if you want the truth – it’s women in those courts and the effect of women in those courts on those courts. The vast majority of bad judges are women. The vast majority of complaints against judges are against female judges.
Reply addressees: @PIAccount1
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-04 18:57:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764726879120924672
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764723828876358018
When even a Judge as incompetent as Sotomayor gets it right, the lower courts were more than incompetent – and criminally so.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-04 16:41:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764692686429118484
RT @greta: When a lower court (Colorado Supreme Court) gets handed a 9-0 decision reversing them it really does suggest that this decisions…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-04 16:36:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764691413525004645
RT @NRO: All soldiers swear to “support and defend” the Constitution, not to participate in some grand social experiment.
The Supreme Cour…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-04 16:32:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764690428597612667
TRUMP BACK ON THE BALLOT – LIKE I SAID …. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1748416552762789970
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-04 16:29:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764689734285119987
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1748416552762789970
TRUMP BACK ON BALLOT: AND … I TOLD YOU SO 😉
Unanimous decision.
But it was fascinating watching both ends of the spectrum. But th outcome was obvious.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/04/supreme-court-rules-in-trump-colorado-ballot-case.html
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-04 16:20:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764687270865441001
RT @AutistocratMS: Imagine a zombie apocalypse but you get arrested for defending yourself from zombie attacks.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-04 01:03:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764456572690804877
RT @state_secession: The framers of the Constitution changed the Preamble to “We the People” as an afterthought
Their true belief is shown…
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-28 14:57:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762854535465165203
So you’re equating very rare cases of sacrifice but a prohibition on capital punishment, to the absence of rare sacrifice for overwhelming numbers of capital punishment? Is that the argument you’re making? Because that doesn’t appear to be a good or logical argument. Especially when such sacrifices had a function that served beyond the superstition to justify them. I mean, Roman capital punishment was practiced on an industrial scale – for sport. And christian mass murder of others for their beliefs is the greatest source of murder and war in european history.
Reply addressees: @ouroborosKXM
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 19:28:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762197900426166272
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762195555382358165