Oct 13, 2019, 11:33 AM it’s how we end the game against us. If you gain value from an identity from a membership, then you must insure the rest of us from the consequences of the organization you fund by your membership. Families insure individuals, individuals insure groups, and no one is free of insuring others.
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Loans Against Trust
Loans Against Trust https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/loans-against-trust/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 16:59:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265689007599398917
-
Loans Against Trust
Oct 15, 2019, 6:05 PM by Luke Weinhagen Law and contract can be used to subsidize for the absence of specific trust, such as between strangers or untested business partners. Both are “loans” against the stored trust in a polity. Enforced and insured by the commons in the form of “WE as a common polity will impose a cost on any party that breaches law or contract”. Law and contract only provide incentives for adherence where you can expect positive reciprocity (trust producing – rule of law) or where you can rely on the enforcement mechanisms to compel adherence (trust consuming – rule by law). Trust consumption eventually gets us back to “Might makes Right” and brings us back to the question “Why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?” (we descend the foundational rule stack). If trust is not there in some form, no one follow the law or sticks to contracts.
-
Loans Against Trust
Oct 15, 2019, 6:05 PM by Luke Weinhagen Law and contract can be used to subsidize for the absence of specific trust, such as between strangers or untested business partners. Both are “loans” against the stored trust in a polity. Enforced and insured by the commons in the form of “WE as a common polity will impose a cost on any party that breaches law or contract”. Law and contract only provide incentives for adherence where you can expect positive reciprocity (trust producing – rule of law) or where you can rely on the enforcement mechanisms to compel adherence (trust consuming – rule by law). Trust consumption eventually gets us back to “Might makes Right” and brings us back to the question “Why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?” (we descend the foundational rule stack). If trust is not there in some form, no one follow the law or sticks to contracts.
-
Disambiguation of Judicial Judgements
Disambiguation of Judicial Judgements https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/disambiguation-of-judicial-judgements/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 16:53:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265687549114269702
-
Disambiguation of Judicial Judgements
Oct 17, 2019, 1:15 PM I have done a little work on disambiguating the charge misdemeanor vs felony (meaningless), but not enough on judgement restitution, personal punishment (prevention), and political punishment(prevention). These subjects are important because the current structure appears illogical to the public, because some crimes are preventable by political punishments (things that are planned) and some crimes are not preventable by political punishments (animal impulse), and some while seemingly more serious, are less likely to be repeated (impulses), while others more likely to be repeated (planned).
-
Disambiguation of Judicial Judgements
Oct 17, 2019, 1:15 PM I have done a little work on disambiguating the charge misdemeanor vs felony (meaningless), but not enough on judgement restitution, personal punishment (prevention), and political punishment(prevention). These subjects are important because the current structure appears illogical to the public, because some crimes are preventable by political punishments (things that are planned) and some crimes are not preventable by political punishments (animal impulse), and some while seemingly more serious, are less likely to be repeated (impulses), while others more likely to be repeated (planned).
-
Prohibiting Demand for The Via-Positiva State
Prohibiting Demand for The Via-Positiva State https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/prohibiting-demand-for-the-via-positiva-state/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 16:50:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265686879405563904
-
Prohibiting Demand for The Via-Positiva State
Oct 18, 2019, 11:01 AM
The failure of the law of tort to keep pace with inventions in parasitism and predation, generates demand for the state to via-positiva impose rules of conduct instead of the law’s via-negativa prohibitions on conduct. This is why jewish-libertarian civs are impossible, and only anglo-rule-of-law civs produce liberty and freedom without via positiva imposition of rule by the state.
-
Prohibiting Demand for The Via-Positiva State
Oct 18, 2019, 11:01 AM
The failure of the law of tort to keep pace with inventions in parasitism and predation, generates demand for the state to via-positiva impose rules of conduct instead of the law’s via-negativa prohibitions on conduct. This is why jewish-libertarian civs are impossible, and only anglo-rule-of-law civs produce liberty and freedom without via positiva imposition of rule by the state.