And Ending Leftism Is a Matter of Ending Parasitism by Law. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/and-ending-leftism-is-a-matter-of-ending-parasitism-by-law/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 18:44:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265715396084039680
Oct 6, 2019, 5:30 PM Of the choices we could make to end the current politio-demographic conflict turning into civil war includes: (a) multi-ethnicity(genetic homogeneity, (b) multi-culturalism (cultural homogeneity), (c) democratic process (universal access to political power), (d) or political ideology (Dysgenic or Eugenic), the most obvious choice is to end leftism as a political preference, and frustrate the undermining of western civilization. And ending leftism is a matter of ending parasitism by law. The rest will follow if leftism isn’t legally possible, and is even illegal speech. The market will serve its purposes. Now, I suspect that we will end democratic process as well. And this well end mutli-culturalism. And this will end immigration. But mutli-ethincity would remain, even if by neighborhood, or city, or state, or region. My understanding is that without subsidy immigration dries up and reverses. But the urban rich and poor, suburban-rural middle will continue. By definancializing the system we restore the balance between urban-high-low vs the middle.
Oct 6, 2019, 5:30 PM Of the choices we could make to end the current politio-demographic conflict turning into civil war includes: (a) multi-ethnicity(genetic homogeneity, (b) multi-culturalism (cultural homogeneity), (c) democratic process (universal access to political power), (d) or political ideology (Dysgenic or Eugenic), the most obvious choice is to end leftism as a political preference, and frustrate the undermining of western civilization. And ending leftism is a matter of ending parasitism by law. The rest will follow if leftism isn’t legally possible, and is even illegal speech. The market will serve its purposes. Now, I suspect that we will end democratic process as well. And this well end mutli-culturalism. And this will end immigration. But mutli-ethincity would remain, even if by neighborhood, or city, or state, or region. My understanding is that without subsidy immigration dries up and reverses. But the urban rich and poor, suburban-rural middle will continue. By definancializing the system we restore the balance between urban-high-low vs the middle.
Why the American Model “worked” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/why-the-american-model-worked/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:51:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265702130888986627
Oct 10, 2019, 6:03 PM by James Louis LaSalle Law is the glue that holds American society and culture together; we are not inherently smarter, nor do we have better natural resources than other countries. What we do have is an idea, that we’re infused with our entire lives: respect for the rule of law. We go to court, we pay our fines, we show up for jury duty, the vast majority of defendants out on bond turn themselves in for their sentences, rather than flee. And it’s just an idea. Kansas City, Missouri has around 500,000 people. It has a police force of 1100 officers, working in three shifts. At any given time, there’s perhaps 300 officers on duty. Policing half a million people. It’s only possible in a society where the citizens respect other citizens’ persons, property, and space. The govt’s primary purpose is to provide me infrastructure to enhance my ability to generate income, purchase property, and protect those activities from other citizens, other countries, and the govt itself. It actually does this so well that we dwell on trivial issues, like who has to bake who a cake. Which is actually pretty awesome when you think about it. Our system isn’t implemented with force. It’s there, lurking in he background, but it isn’t the prime mover. The IDEA of the rule of law is the prime mover. It’s why Americans find concepts like “sanctuary cities”, where the rule of law is suspended, utterly infuriating. I would say it’s one of the single greatest factors in the election of Trump. Nothing offends your regular American more than someone escaping Justice.
Oct 10, 2019, 6:03 PM by James Louis LaSalle Law is the glue that holds American society and culture together; we are not inherently smarter, nor do we have better natural resources than other countries. What we do have is an idea, that we’re infused with our entire lives: respect for the rule of law. We go to court, we pay our fines, we show up for jury duty, the vast majority of defendants out on bond turn themselves in for their sentences, rather than flee. And it’s just an idea. Kansas City, Missouri has around 500,000 people. It has a police force of 1100 officers, working in three shifts. At any given time, there’s perhaps 300 officers on duty. Policing half a million people. It’s only possible in a society where the citizens respect other citizens’ persons, property, and space. The govt’s primary purpose is to provide me infrastructure to enhance my ability to generate income, purchase property, and protect those activities from other citizens, other countries, and the govt itself. It actually does this so well that we dwell on trivial issues, like who has to bake who a cake. Which is actually pretty awesome when you think about it. Our system isn’t implemented with force. It’s there, lurking in he background, but it isn’t the prime mover. The IDEA of the rule of law is the prime mover. It’s why Americans find concepts like “sanctuary cities”, where the rule of law is suspended, utterly infuriating. I would say it’s one of the single greatest factors in the election of Trump. Nothing offends your regular American more than someone escaping Justice.
The Law Creates Trust, and We Create Observance of It https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/the-law-creates-trust-and-we-create-observance-of-it/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:44:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265700475179020290
Oct 11, 2019, 4:20 PM by Luke Weinhagen “Every man a Sheriff” In a high trust group this is not a request, nor a demand, it is a description. That is the nuance I’d like to add – that it is our individual willingness to apply the law, and to self-enforce, that is the difference not just the idea (other groups see those very same laws, interpret the same ideas, as weak points to exploit). The idea of law, and its individual observance and practice, allows trust to be the prime mover. (shifting from passive to active)
Oct 11, 2019, 4:20 PM by Luke Weinhagen “Every man a Sheriff” In a high trust group this is not a request, nor a demand, it is a description. That is the nuance I’d like to add – that it is our individual willingness to apply the law, and to self-enforce, that is the difference not just the idea (other groups see those very same laws, interpret the same ideas, as weak points to exploit). The idea of law, and its individual observance and practice, allows trust to be the prime mover. (shifting from passive to active)
What Honest Anarchists Are Grasping For: Rule of Law https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/what-honest-anarchists-are-grasping-for-rule-of-law/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:43:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265700241849946112